3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Differences in tobacco use among two-year and four-year college students in Minnesota.

      Journal of American college health : J of ACH
      Adult, Age Distribution, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Incidence, Logistic Models, Male, Minnesota, epidemiology, Multivariate Analysis, Probability, Questionnaires, Risk Assessment, Sex Distribution, Smoking, Students, statistics & numerical data, Tobacco, adverse effects, Tobacco Use Disorder, Universities, Young Adult

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This study compares tobacco use rates among two-year and four-year college students and explores the demographic variables that predicted that behavior. 9,931 students at 14 two-year and four-year colleges in Minnesota participated. Students at 11 schools completed an online survey, and students at 3 schools completed a paper survey in 2007. After controlling for sex, age, ethnicity, relationship status, hours of work per week, and number of school credits, attending a two-year college predicted current and daily smoking (odds ratio [OR]) = 1.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.52-1.89; OR = 3.47, 95% CI = 2.94-4.11) and smokeless tobacco use (OR = 1.65, 95% CI = 1.32-2.06; OR = 1.64, 95% CI = 1.06-2.53). Although two-year college students comprise approximately two fifths of the college student population, surveys of college student tobacco use have focused nearly exclusively on four-year college students. Two-year college students should represent a priority population for tobacco control because attending a two-year college predicts increased tobacco use.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article