10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Plant size influences abundance of floral visitors and biomass allocation for the cushion plant Thylacospermum caespitosum under an extreme alpine environment

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Variation in size may influence the abundance of visitors and reproductive allocation for cushion plants in the extreme alpine environments. To assess effects of plant size on the abundance of main visitors and reproductive allocation in Thylacospermum caespitosum populations at two altitudes, the abundance of the visitors, visiting frequency, total number of flowers, number of fruits, number of unseeded flowers, and reproductive allocation were investigated during the period of reproductive growth. Concurrently, the effects of plant size on the visitors' contributions to fruit setting rate were assessed by a bagging experiment. Our results showed that flies ( Musca domestica and Dasyphora asiatica) were the main pollinating insects of T. caespitosum, and they could obvious facilitate ( p < 0.05) the fruit setting rate of this cushion plant. Seed set and floral visitation were significantly influenced ( p < 0.001) by plant size. Moreover, the reproductive allocation and fruit setting rate of T. caespitosum was influenced ( p < 0.001) by plant size. More biomass was allocated to reproduction in plants of greater diameter. There is an increase in reproductive success (increases of fruit number with increase in plant size) in relation to plant size. In conclusion, the extent of M. domestica and D. asiatica to facilitate the fruit setting rate mainly depended on the size of T. caespitosum. Size‐dependent reproductive allocation occurred in T. caespitosum and was the chief factor affecting the contribution of flies to fruit setting rate. These traits reflect reproductive fitness of T. caespitosum related to plant size in extreme alpine environments.

          Related collections

          Most cited references93

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Generalization in Pollination Systems, and Why it Matters

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The Ecology and Economics of Storage in Plants

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Non-bee insects are important contributors to global crop pollination

              Wild and managed bees are well documented as effective pollinators of global crops of economic importance. However, the contributions by pollinators other than bees have been little explored despite their potential to contribute to crop production and stability in the face of environmental change. Non-bee pollinators include flies, beetles, moths, butterflies, wasps, ants, birds, and bats, among others. Here we focus on non-bee insects and synthesize 39 field studies from five continents that directly measured the crop pollination services provided by non-bees, honey bees, and other bees to compare the relative contributions of these taxa. Non-bees performed 25-50% of the total number of flower visits. Although non-bees were less effective pollinators than bees per flower visit, they made more visits; thus these two factors compensated for each other, resulting in pollination services rendered by non-bees that were similar to those provided by bees. In the subset of studies that measured fruit set, fruit set increased with non-bee insect visits independently of bee visitation rates, indicating that non-bee insects provide a unique benefit that is not provided by bees. We also show that non-bee insects are not as reliant as bees on the presence of remnant natural or seminatural habitat in the surrounding landscape. These results strongly suggest that non-bee insect pollinators play a significant role in global crop production and respond differently than bees to landscape structure, probably making their crop pollination services more robust to changes in land use. Non-bee insects provide a valuable service and provide potential insurance against bee population declines.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                604496229@qq.com
                Journal
                Ecol Evol
                Ecol Evol
                10.1002/(ISSN)2045-7758
                ECE3
                Ecology and Evolution
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                2045-7758
                10 April 2019
                May 2019
                : 9
                : 9 ( doiID: 10.1002/ece3.2019.9.issue-9 )
                : 5501-5511
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] MOE Key Laboratory of Cell Activities and Stress Adaptations School of Life Sciences Lanzhou University Lanzhou China
                [ 2 ] The College of Forestry Beijing Forestry University Beijing China
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Lizhe An, The College of Forestry, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China.

                Email: 604496229@ 123456qq.com

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1070-8419
                Article
                ECE35147
                10.1002/ece3.5147
                6509400
                530c5ed0-c276-4162-810d-6c66429c45c8
                © 2019 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 16 November 2017
                : 18 March 2019
                : 18 March 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 6, Tables: 1, Pages: 11, Words: 8997
                Funding
                Funded by: Key Program National Natural Science Foundation of China
                Award ID: 41830321
                Award ID: 31230014
                Funded by: National Science Foundation of China
                Award ID: 31770432
                Funded by: National Basic Research Program of China
                Award ID: 2013CB429904
                Funded by: Science and Technology Partnership Program, Ministry of Science and Technology of China
                Award ID: KY201501008
                Funded by: National Science and Technology Major Project in Gansu
                Award ID: 17ZD2WA017
                Categories
                Original Research
                Original Research
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                ece35147
                May 2019
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_NLMPMC version:5.6.2.1 mode:remove_FC converted:10.05.2019

                Evolutionary Biology
                cushion plants,flies,ontogeny,pollination,reproductive allocation,seed set
                Evolutionary Biology
                cushion plants, flies, ontogeny, pollination, reproductive allocation, seed set

                Comments

                Comment on this article