12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Effectiveness of thiazide and thiazide-like diuretics in advanced chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background and objective

          Thiazide diuretics are first-line drugs for the treatment of hypertension, but hypertension treatment guidelines have systematically discouraged their use in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD). For the first time, a systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis were performed to assess the effectiveness of thiazides and thiazide-like diuretics to treat hypertension in patients with stages 3b, 4, and 5 CKD.

          Design, setting, participants, & measurements

          A systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis that included a literature search using the following databases were performed: MEDLINE through PubMed, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) through the Cochrane Library, Embase, and ISI – Web of Science (all databases). Prospective studies that evaluated the effectiveness of thiazide and thiazide-like diuretics in individuals with a GFR < 45 mL/min/1.73 m 2 were included.

          Results

          Five clinical trials, totaling 214 participants, were included, and the mean GFR ranged from 13.0 ± 5.9 mL/min/1.73 m 2 to 26.8 ± 8.8 mL/min/1.73 m 2. There was evidence of a reduction in mean blood pressure and in GFR, as well as in fractional sodium excretion and fractional chloride excretion.

          Conclusion

          Thiazide and thiazide-like diuretics seem to maintain their effectiveness in lowering blood pressure in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease. These findings should spur new prospective randomized trials and spark discussions, particularly about upcoming hypertension guidelines.

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement

          Systematic reviews should build on a protocol that describes the rationale, hypothesis, and planned methods of the review; few reviews report whether a protocol exists. Detailed, well-described protocols can facilitate the understanding and appraisal of the review methods, as well as the detection of modifications to methods and selective reporting in completed reviews. We describe the development of a reporting guideline, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses for Protocols 2015 (PRISMA-P 2015). PRISMA-P consists of a 17-item checklist intended to facilitate the preparation and reporting of a robust protocol for the systematic review. Funders and those commissioning reviews might consider mandating the use of the checklist to facilitate the submission of relevant protocol information in funding applications. Similarly, peer reviewers and editors can use the guidance to gauge the completeness and transparency of a systematic review protocol submitted for publication in a journal or other medium.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions

            Non-randomised studies of the effects of interventions are critical to many areas of healthcare evaluation, but their results may be biased. It is therefore important to understand and appraise their strengths and weaknesses. We developed ROBINS-I (“Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions”), a new tool for evaluating risk of bias in estimates of the comparative effectiveness (harm or benefit) of interventions from studies that did not use randomisation to allocate units (individuals or clusters of individuals) to comparison groups. The tool will be particularly useful to those undertaking systematic reviews that include non-randomised studies.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found

              2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Ren Fail
                Ren Fail
                Renal Failure
                Taylor & Francis
                0886-022X
                1525-6049
                13 January 2023
                2023
                13 January 2023
                : 45
                : 1
                : 2163903
                Affiliations
                [a ]School of Medicine, Federal University of Alagoas (UFAL) , Maceió, Brazil
                [b ]School of Medicine, State University of Health Sciences of Alagoas (UNCISAL) , Maceió, Brazil
                [c ]Center for Higher Studies of Maceió (CESMAC), School of Medicine , Maceió, Brazil
                [d ]D'Or Institute for Research and Education (IDOR), Hospital São Rafael , Salvador, Bahia, Brazil
                [e ]Pernambuco Hypertension Service (SHIP), PROCAPE - University of Pernambuco (UPE) , Recife, Brazil
                [f ]Keizo Asami Laboratory of Immunopathology, Federal University of Pernambuco , Recife, Brazil
                Author notes
                CONTACT Rodrigo Bezerra rodrigobzrra@ 123456gmail.com PROCAPE-University of Pernambuco , Brazil. Rua dos Palmares, S/N – Santo Amaro, Recife – PE - CEP: 74970-240, Brazil
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6937-5615
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0021-5963
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9983-4720
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9719-3176
                Article
                2163903
                10.1080/0886022X.2022.2163903
                9848247
                36637019
                52f61c9d-528f-4ed9-aecc-00a9e0660653
                © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 1, Pages: 9, Words: 5440
                Categories
                Research Article
                Clinical Study

                Nephrology
                chronic kidney disease,hypertension,diuretics, thiazides
                Nephrology
                chronic kidney disease, hypertension, diuretics, thiazides

                Comments

                Comment on this article