12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Comparison of infectious bursal disease live vaccines and a HVT-IBD vector vaccine and their effects on the immune system of commercial layer pullets.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Infectious bursal disease (IBD) is an economically important disease affecting poultry production worldwide. Previous experimental studies indicated that IBD live vaccination may induce transient immunosuppression, leading to suboptimal vaccine responses and therefore insufficient protection against other pathogens. Layer pullets are commonly not only vaccinated against IBD within their rearing period, but also against a variety of other pathogens. Therefore, it is of interest to investigate the effects of different IBD vaccination regimes on conventionally applied vaccines against other pathogens, and possible protection against widely spread very virulent IBD-virus (vvIBDV). A commercially available Herpesvirus of turkey vector vaccine (vHVT-IBD) expressing viral protein 2 of IBDV, and two IBD live vaccines were compared in commercial pullets for their effects on circulating B cell numbers, the ability of vaccinated birds to mount a humoral immune response against different antigens as well as their ability to induce protection against vvIBDV challenge. The results of this study demonstrate a clear immunosuppressive effect of the intermediate plus IBD live vaccine on the humoral branch of the immune system. On the other hand, no detectable effects of vHVT-IBD vaccination on these parameters were observed. All tested IBD vaccines protected against clinical IBD, although none induced sterile immunity in commercial layer pullets. vHVT-IBD-vaccinated birds showed significantly less lesions after vvIBDV challenge than IBD live-vaccinated or non-vaccinated birds (P < 0.05). Therefore, vHVT-IBD may be a suitable alternative to conventional IBD live vaccines, and may be applied even in the presence of maternally derived IBD antibodies without induction of detectable humoral immunosuppression.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Avian Pathol.
          Avian pathology : journal of the W.V.P.A
          Informa UK Limited
          1465-3338
          0307-9457
          2016
          : 45
          : 1
          Affiliations
          [1 ] a Merial Italia spa , Milan , Italy.
          [2 ] b Merial GmbH , Hallbergmoos , Germany.
          [3 ] c Clinic for Poultry , University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover , Hannover , Germany.
          [4 ] d Tierärztliche Praxis , Delbrück , Germany.
          [5 ] e Merial S.A.S. , Lyon Cedex , France.
          Article
          10.1080/03079457.2015.1127891
          26743805
          52d4ece7-e7a0-4f1e-a6de-19fc7bb8418e
          History

          immunosuppression,vector HVT-IBD,Infectious bursal disease,chicken,vaccine

          Comments

          Comment on this article