44
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Effectiveness of Dry Eye Therapy Under Conditions of Environmental Stress

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose: Dry eye is often characterized by increased tear evaporation due to poor tear film quality, especially of the lipid component of the tear film. Using an environmental chamber to induce environmental stress, this study compared the effect of three lubricant eye drops on various aspects of tear physiology in a crossover design (evaporation was the principal outcome measure).

          Methods: Three eye drop formulas were tested: 0.5% carmellose sodium (Drop C), 0.5% carmellose sodium with added lipid (Drop C-L) and 1.0% glycerine with added lipid (Drop G-L). Nineteen control and 18 dry eye subjects used each product for 2 weeks, three times per day, in a random order, with a minimum 1-week washout between treatment periods. Tear evaporation, break up time, osmolarity, tear structure (by interferometry) and patient symptoms were assessed with the subjects adapted for 10 min in an environmental chamber controlled at 20% relative humidity and 22 °C. The treatment effects were analyzed using general linear model repeated measures analyses of variance.

          Results: In dry eye subjects, evaporation, break up time, osmolarity and symptoms improved for all formulas ( p < 0.05). Normal subjects showed some improvements: evaporation with C-L, osmolarity with C and symptoms with C-L and G-L. Change in evaporation was greater for both C-L and G-L versus C ( p < 0.05), and there was a trend for C-L to reduce evaporation more than G-L ( p < 0.11). There were no significant treatment effects on tear film structure.

          Conclusion: Overall, the eye drop formula containing both carmellose sodium and lipid (C-L) produced a greater treatment effect on tear evaporation than the other formulations containing only one of these ingredients. This study also demonstrates the utility of a controlled environmental chamber in showing the difference in performance between dry eye treatments.

          Related collections

          Most cited references33

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Distribution of aqueous-deficient and evaporative dry eye in a clinic-based patient cohort: a retrospective study.

          To evaluate in a general clinic-based cohort of patients with dry eye disease (DED) the distribution of patients with aqueous-deficient or evaporative subtype of DED. Schirmer tests and meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) (Foulks-Bron scoring) were evaluated in both eyes of 299 normal subjects and DED patients (218 women and 81 men) across 10 sites in the European Union and the United States. Using the more severe measurement of the 2 eyes, subjects were considered to have pure aqueous-deficient dry eye (ADDE) with Schirmer values of 5 and Schirmer values of ≥7 mm. Subjects were placed into the mixed (hybrid) category if they exhibited both a low Schirmer value of 5. Of the 224 subjects classified with DED using an objective, composite, disease severity scale, 159 were classified into 1 of 3 categories: 79 were classified with only MGD, whereas only 23 were classified as purely aqueous deficient, and 57 showed evidence of both MGD and aqueous deficiency. Overall, 86% of these qualified DED patients demonstrated signs of MGD. The remaining 65 patients showed evidence of DED through other clinical signs, without overt evidence of MGD or ADDE, possibly because of the inherent variability of these signs. The proportion of subjects exhibiting signs of evaporative dry eye resulting from MGD far outweighs that of subjects with pure ADDE in a general clinic-based patient cohort.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Marked reduction and distinct patterns of eye blinking in patients with moderately dry eyes during video display terminal use.

            To analyze the spontaneous eye-blink rate (SEBR) and blinking pattern in patients with moderately dry eyes during video display terminal (VDT) use. The SEBR of 30 patients with dry eye syndrome (median age 44.8 years, range 18 - 67 years) was measured using a computer-based video analysis system. Only complete eye blinks were recorded during 10 min of conversation, during initial VDT use and again after a preceding work period of 30 min. In comparison with SEBR during conversation (mean value 16.8 blinks/min, standard deviation 16.8 blinks/min) the SEBR significantly decreased during initial VDT use (6.6+/-4.8; P<0.001) and remained significantly decreased during re-measurement after 30 min (5.9+/-4.6; P<0.001). SEBR was not significantly different between initial VDT use and re-measurement after 30 min ( P=0.65). The SEBR was characterized by marked interindividual variability during conversation and VDT use. No significant correlation was found between SEBR (either during conversation or during VDT use), and the quality (tear break-up time) or quantity (Schirmer I test, Jones test) of the tear film. Typical blinking patterns were found to be (1). a relatively time-independent, irregular pattern, (2). an initial phase of 2-4 min with shorter inter-eye-blink intervals, and (3). alternating periods of higher and lower inter-eye-blink intervals. Reduction of the SEBR during VDT use is primarily determined by marked visual attention, resulting in an exacerbation of dry eye symptoms in predisposed humans. High interindividual variability and distinct patterns of eye blinking may be key factors in further clarification of VDT-eye interactions and develop individually designed solutions to prevent desiccation during VDT use.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The effect of two novel lubricant eye drops on tear film lipid layer thickness in subjects with dry eye symptoms.

              Because the lipid layer of the tear film is recognized as a critical component in dry eye disease, this study was designed to determine if a single eye drop of either Soothe or Systane produces a significant increase in lipid layer thickness (LLT) for subjects reporting symptoms indicative of dry eyes. A double-blind, internally paired study was performed. A custom-built lipid layer interferometer, enabling characterization of lipid layer interference patterns, was used to quantify baseline LLT (OU) of eligible subjects. Inclusion criteria included: 1) presence of dry eye symptoms and 2) baseline LLT 0.5). The mean LLT for eyes treated with Soothe increased to 124.4 +/- 4.9 nm (p < 0.0001). The mean LLT for eyes treated with Systane increased to 71.3 +/- 2.6 nm (p < 0.0001). The LLT increase from Soothe was significantly greater than that from Systane (p < 0.0001). In subjects with symptoms indicative of dry eye states and LLT < or =75 nm, one eye drop of Soothe more than doubled LLT, a 107% mean increase, whereas Systane increased LLT by 16%.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Curr Eye Res
                Curr. Eye Res
                CEY
                Current Eye Research
                Informa Healthcare USA, Inc.
                0271-3683
                1460-2202
                February 2013
                7 January 2013
                : 38
                : 2
                : 229-236
                Affiliations
                1Vision Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University GlasgowUK
                2Consumer Eye Care Research & Development, Allergan LLC Irvine, CAUSA
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Alan Tomlinson, Department of Vision Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University , 30 Cowcaddens Road, Glasgow G4 0BA, USA. Tel: +0044 141 331. E-mail: a.tomlinson@ 123456gcu.ac.uk
                Article
                CEY_A_757323_O
                10.3109/02713683.2012.757323
                3585441
                23294168
                52463408-f5e9-4ed1-a3e7-29fcaca31346
                © 2013 Informa UK Ltd All rights reserved: reproduction in whole or part not permitted

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the source is credited.

                History
                : 20 August 2012
                : 21 November 2012
                : 25 November 2012
                Categories
                Original Articles

                Vision sciences
                dry eye therapy,environment,humidity
                Vision sciences
                dry eye therapy, environment, humidity

                Comments

                Comment on this article