4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Health care management adequacy among French persons with severe profound intellectual and multiple disabilities: a longitudinal study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The care organization of persons with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities (PIMD) varies by country according to the health care system. This study used a large sample of French individuals with severe PIMD/polyhandicap to assess: 1) the adequacy of care setting over a 5-year period and 2) health care consumption.

          Methods

          The longitudinal study used data from the French EVALuation PoLyHandicap (EVAL-PLH) cohort of persons with severe PIMD/polyhandicap who were receiving managed in specialized care centres and residential facilities. Two assessments were performed: wave 1 (T1) in 2015–2016 and wave 2 (T2) in 2020–2021. The inclusion criteria were as follows: age > 3 years at the time of inclusion; age at onset of cerebral lesion younger than 3 years old; and severe PIMD. The adequacy of the care setting was based on the following: i) objective indicators, i.e., adequacy for age and adequacy for health status severity; ii) subjective indicators, i.e., self-perception of the referring physician about medical care adequacy and educational care adequacy. Health care consumption was assessed based on medical and paramedical care.

          Results

          Among the 492 persons assessed at the 2 times, 50% of individuals at T1 and 46% of individuals at T2 were in an inadequate care setting based on age and severity. Regarding global subjective inadequacy, the combination of medical adequacy and educational adequacy, 7% of individuals at T1 and 13% of individuals at T2 were in an inadequate care setting. At T2, a majority of individuals were undermonitored by medical care providers (general practitioners, physical medicine rehabilitation physicians, neurologists, orthopaedists, etc.). Important gaps were found between performed and prescribed sessions of various paramedical care (physiotherapy, occupational therapy, psychomotor therapy, etc.).

          Conclusions

          This study revealed key elements of inadequate care management for persons with severe PIMD/polyhandicap in France. Based on these important findings, healthcare workers, familial caregivers, patients experts, and health decision-makers should develop appropriate care organizations to optimize the global care management of these individuals.

          Trial registration

          NCT02400528, registered 27/03/2015.

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-024-10552-9.

          Related collections

          Most cited references17

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Improving the transition between paediatric and adult healthcare: a systematic review.

          The transition between paediatric and adult care for young people with chronic illness or disability is often poorly managed, with adverse consequences for health. Although many agree that adolescent services need to be improved, there is little empirical data on which policies can be based. To systematically review the evidence of effectiveness of transitional care programmes in young people aged 11-25 with chronic illness (physical or mental) or disability, and identify their successful components. A systematic literature review in July 2010 of studies which consistently evaluated health outcomes following transition programmes, either by comparison with a control group or by measurement pre-intervention and post-intervention. 10 studies met the inclusion criteria, six of which showed statistically significant improvements in outcomes. Descriptive analysis identified three broad categories of intervention, directed at: the patient (educational programmes, skills training); staffing (named transition co-ordinators, joint clinics run by paediatric and adult physicians); and service delivery (separate young adult clinics, out of hours phone support, enhanced follow-up). The conditions involved varied (eg, cystic fibrosis, diabetes mellitus), and outcome measures varied accordingly. All six interventions that resulted in significant improvements were in studies of patients with diabetes mellitus, with glycosylated haemoglobin level, acute and chronic complications, and rates of follow-up and screening used as outcome measures. The most commonly used strategies in successful programmes were patient education and specific transition clinics (either jointly staffed by paediatric and adult physicians or dedicated young adult clinics within adult services). It is not clear how generalisable these successful studies in diabetes mellitus will be to other conditions.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            A Need for a Taxonomy for Profound Intellectual and Multiple Disabilities

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Frequency and severity of challenging behaviour in people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities.

              The main goals of this study were to determine the prevalence, frequency and severity of challenging behaviour in people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities (PIMD). Because in the literature several health problems and sensory impairments are associated with the onset and existence of challenging behaviour, this relationship was also examined. This study involved 181 people with PIMD (age: mean: 35; SD: 19, 56% male). The Behaviour Problem Inventory was used to determine prevalence, frequency and severity of self-injurious (SIB), stereotypical and aggressive/destructive behaviour, and an additional questionnaire was used to determine the presence of sensory impairments and health problems among the participants. Results show a prevalence of 82% for SIB and stereotypical behaviour in the sample. Aggressive/destructive behaviour was seen in 45% of the participants. Concerning the frequency, on average SIB occurs on a daily or weekly basis. Stereotypical behaviour is seen on a daily basis and aggressive/destructive behaviour is usually reported once a week. All three types of challenging behaviour also occur on an hourly basis. The severity of challenging behaviour is usually rated by staff as of minor consequence for the person with PIMD. Furthermore, a relationship was found between having visual, tactile or psychiatric problems and the occurrence of challenging behaviour. Participants with visual impairments, tactile impairments or psychiatric problems showed significantly higher mean scores regarding challenging behaviour. Challenging behaviour within the target group of people with PIMD is very common. The prevalence figures are high, but direct support professionals are not inclined to rate such behaviour as of serious consequence.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                karine.baumstarck@univ-amu.fr
                Journal
                BMC Health Serv Res
                BMC Health Serv Res
                BMC Health Services Research
                BioMed Central (London )
                1472-6963
                18 January 2024
                18 January 2024
                2024
                : 24
                : 99
                Affiliations
                [1 ]EA 3279, CEReSS - Research Centre On Health Services and Quality of Life, Aix Marseille University, ( https://ror.org/035xkbk20) 27 Boulevard Jean-Moulin, 13385 Marseille, France
                [2 ]Epidemiology and Health Economy Department, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, ( https://ror.org/002cp4060) 27, Boulevard Jean-Moulin, 13385 Marseille, France
                [3 ]UR 849, LPS - Social Psychology Laboratory, Aix-Marseille University, ( https://ror.org/035xkbk20) 29 Av. Robert Schuman, 13621 Aix-en-Provence, France
                [4 ]General Union Health Insurance Fund (Union Générale Caisse Assurance Maladie, UGECAM), 26-50 Avenue du Professeur-André-Lemierre, 75986 Paris, Ile de France, France
                [5 ]Hendaye Hospital, Route Corniche, ( https://ror.org/00pg5jh14) 64700 Hendaye, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, France
                [6 ]Committee for Studies, Education and Care for People With Multiple Disabilities (Comité d’Études, d’Éducation Et de Soins Auprès Des Personnes Polyhandicapées, CESAP), 62 Rue de La Glacière, 75013 Paris, France
                [7 ]Service de Polyhandicap Pédiatrique, Roche Guyon Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, ( https://ror.org/00pg5jh14) 1 Rue Justinien Blazy 95780, La Roche-Guyon, France
                [8 ]GRID grid.50550.35, ISNI 0000 0001 2175 4109, Hospital Fédération Des Hôpitaux de Polyhandicap Et Multihandicap, , San Salvadour Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, ; 4312 Rte de L’Almanarre, 83400 Hyères, France
                Article
                10552
                10.1186/s12913-024-10552-9
                10795329
                38238747
                52344947-4da2-4d7f-a427-be11a26cfdd6
                © The Author(s) 2024

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 3 April 2023
                : 3 January 2024
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2024

                Health & Social care
                care management,pimd,polyhandicap,adequacy,health consumption
                Health & Social care
                care management, pimd, polyhandicap, adequacy, health consumption

                Comments

                Comment on this article