49
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    2
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      ATR Mediates a Checkpoint at the Nuclear Envelope in Response to Mechanical Stress

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          ATR controls chromosome integrity and chromatin dynamics. We have previously shown that yeast Mec1/ATR promotes chromatin detachment from the nuclear envelope to counteract aberrant topological transitions during DNA replication. Here, we provide evidence that ATR activity at the nuclear envelope responds to mechanical stress. Human ATR associates with the nuclear envelope during S phase and prophase, and both osmotic stress and mechanical stretching relocalize ATR to nuclear membranes throughout the cell cycle. The ATR-mediated mechanical response occurs within the range of physiological forces, is reversible, and is independent of DNA damage signaling. ATR-defective cells exhibit aberrant chromatin condensation and nuclear envelope breakdown. We propose that mechanical forces derived from chromosome dynamics and torsional stress on nuclear membranes activate ATR to modulate nuclear envelope plasticity and chromatin association to the nuclear envelope, thus enabling cells to cope with the mechanical strain imposed by these molecular processes.

          Graphical Abstract

          Highlights

          • ATR localizes at the nuclear envelope in S phase and prophase

          • ATR responds to mechanical stress by relocalizing to the nuclear envelope

          • The ATR mechanical response is fast and reversible

          • ATR coordinates chromatin condensation and nuclear envelope breakdown

          Abstract

          ATR responds to various kinds of mechanical stress by relocating to the nuclear envelope and signaling, independent of the DNA-damage response pathway. ATR may enable cells to cope with mechanical strain imposed by molecular processes, such as chromosome dynamics.

          Related collections

          Most cited references53

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          ATR prohibits replication catastrophe by preventing global exhaustion of RPA.

          ATR, activated by replication stress, protects replication forks locally and suppresses origin firing globally. Here, we show that these functions of ATR are mechanistically coupled. Although initially stable, stalled forks in ATR-deficient cells undergo nucleus-wide breakage after unscheduled origin firing generates an excess of single-stranded DNA that exhausts the nuclear pool of RPA. Partial reduction of RPA accelerated fork breakage, and forced elevation of RPA was sufficient to delay such "replication catastrophe" even in the absence of ATR activity. Conversely, unscheduled origin firing induced breakage of stalled forks even in cells with active ATR. Thus, ATR-mediated suppression of dormant origins shields active forks against irreversible breakage via preventing exhaustion of nuclear RPA. This study elucidates how replicating genomes avoid destabilizing DNA damage. Because cancer cells commonly feature intrinsically high replication stress, this study also provides a molecular rationale for their hypersensitivity to ATR inhibitors. Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Fork reversal and ssDNA accumulation at stalled replication forks owing to checkpoint defects.

            Checkpoint-mediated control of replicating chromosomes is essential for preventing cancer. In yeast, Rad53 kinase protects stalled replication forks from pathological rearrangements. To characterize the mechanisms controlling fork integrity, we analyzed replication intermediates formed in response to replication blocks using electron microscopy. At the forks, wild-type cells accumulate short single-stranded regions, which likely causes checkpoint activation, whereas rad53 mutants exhibit extensive single-stranded gaps and hemi-replicated intermediates, consistent with a lagging-strand synthesis defect. Further, rad53 cells accumulate Holliday junctions through fork reversal. We speculate that, in checkpoint mutants, abnormal replication intermediates begin to form because of uncoordinated replication and are further processed by unscheduled recombination pathways, causing genome instability.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Nuclear mechanics during cell migration.

              During cell migration, the movement of the nucleus must be coordinated with the cytoskeletal dynamics at the leading edge and trailing end, and, as a result, undergoes complex changes in position and shape, which in turn affects cell polarity, shape, and migration efficiency. We here describe the steps of nuclear positioning and deformation during cell polarization and migration, focusing on migration through three-dimensional matrices. We discuss molecular components that govern nuclear shape and stiffness, and review how nuclear dynamics are connected to and controlled by the actin, tubulin and intermediate cytoskeleton-based migration machinery and how this regulation is altered in pathological conditions. Understanding the regulation of nuclear biomechanics has important implications for cell migration during tissue regeneration, immune defence and cancer. Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Cell
                Cell
                Cell
                Cell Press
                0092-8674
                1097-4172
                31 July 2014
                31 July 2014
                : 158
                : 3
                : 633-646
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Fondazione Istituto FIRC di Oncologia Molecolare (IFOM), Via Adamello 16, 20139 Milan, Italy
                [2 ]Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy
                [3 ]Institute of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University, 77115 Olomouc, Czech Republic
                [4 ]Danish Cancer Society Research Center, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
                [5 ]Institute of Molecular Genetics, v.v.i., Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, 14220 Prague, Czech Republic
                [6 ]Mechanobiology Institute and Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, 117411 Singapore, Singapore
                Author notes
                []Corresponding author jb@ 123456cancer.dk
                [∗∗ ]Corresponding author marco.foiani@ 123456ifom.eu
                Article
                S0092-8674(14)00804-6
                10.1016/j.cell.2014.05.046
                4121522
                25083873
                51fcf7c5-7e0d-44e8-a78a-a222af2bbdad
                © 2014 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/).

                History
                : 23 November 2013
                : 14 April 2014
                : 28 May 2014
                Categories
                Article

                Cell biology
                Cell biology

                Comments

                Comment on this article