13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Study, conservation and exhibition of human remains: the need of a bioethical perspective

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Today, the recovery, study and exposition of archaeological human remains are subjected to new discussions. Human remains preserve a clear record of past life to later generations. These remains, even if dated hundreds or thousands of years ago, maintain their human dignity and force the community to reflect on the ethical issues related to their analysis, curation and display. Such a topic stimulate a continuous dialogue between the different actors of the bioarchaeological/osteoarchaeological/anthropological (physical and forensic) field: archaeologists, anthropologists, bioethicists, museum curators and other figures in order to give voice to a broad range of approaches and identify shared paths on the management of human remains that respect human dignity and different cultural values of community. As a “culturally sensitive material”, human remains collections must be acquired and handled with respect regardless of their age and legitimacy of provenance. The opening up to disciplines quite far from the expertize of museum curators is an essential prerequisite to increase awareness towards ethical issues and to develop guidelines that take into account the dignity of the person and the cultural values of community to whom human remains belonged. Accordingly, the authors stimulate the increase of the discussion and try to identify solutions sensitive to the issue. (www.actabiomedica.it)

          Related collections

          Most cited references56

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found
          Is Open Access

          The ancestry and affiliations of Kennewick Man.

          Kennewick Man, referred to as the Ancient One by Native Americans, is a male human skeleton discovered in Washington state (USA) in 1996 and initially radiocarbon dated to 8,340-9,200 calibrated years before present (BP). His population affinities have been the subject of scientific debate and legal controversy. Based on an initial study of cranial morphology it was asserted that Kennewick Man was neither Native American nor closely related to the claimant Plateau tribes of the Pacific Northwest, who claimed ancestral relationship and requested repatriation under the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA). The morphological analysis was important to judicial decisions that Kennewick Man was not Native American and that therefore NAGPRA did not apply. Instead of repatriation, additional studies of the remains were permitted. Subsequent craniometric analysis affirmed Kennewick Man to be more closely related to circumpacific groups such as the Ainu and Polynesians than he is to modern Native Americans. In order to resolve Kennewick Man's ancestry and affiliations, we have sequenced his genome to ∼1× coverage and compared it to worldwide genomic data including for the Ainu and Polynesians. We find that Kennewick Man is closer to modern Native Americans than to any other population worldwide. Among the Native American groups for whom genome-wide data are available for comparison, several seem to be descended from a population closely related to that of Kennewick Man, including the Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation (Colville), one of the five tribes claiming Kennewick Man. We revisit the cranial analyses and find that, as opposed to genome-wide comparisons, it is not possible on that basis to affiliate Kennewick Man to specific contemporary groups. We therefore conclude based on genetic comparisons that Kennewick Man shows continuity with Native North Americans over at least the last eight millennia.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Book: not found

            Human Skeletal Remains. Excavation, Analysis, Interpretation

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Bodily rights and property rights.

              Whereas previous discussions on ownership of biological material have been much informed by the natural rights tradition, insufficient attention has been paid to the strand in liberal political theory represented by Felix Cohen, Tony Honoré, and others, which treats property relations as socially constructed bundles of rights. In accordance with that tradition, we propose that the primary normative issue is what combination of rights a person should have to a particular item of biological material. Whether that bundle qualifies to be called "property" or "ownership" is a secondary, terminological issue. We suggest five principles of bodily rights and show how they can be applied to the construction of ethically appropriate bundles of rights to biological material.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Acta Biomed
                Acta Biomed
                Acta Bio Medica : Atenei Parmensis
                Mattioli 1885 (Italy )
                0392-4203
                2531-6745
                2020
                07 October 2020
                : 91
                : 4
                : e2020110
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Centre of Research in Osteoarchaeology and Paleopathology Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
                [2 ]Section of Legal and Forensic Medicine, Department of Science of Health, University of Genoa, Genova, Italy
                [3 ]Department of Life Sciences and Systems Biology, University of Turin, Torino, Italy
                [4 ]Department of Medicine and Aging Sciences, University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy
                [5 ]UOSD of Fetal and Perinatal Pathology, Istituto Giannina Gaslini
                [6 ]Department of Surgical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Genova
                [7 ]Section History of Medicine and Bioethics, Department of Science of Health, University of Genoa, Genova, Italy
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Marta Licata Centre of Research in Osteoarchaeology and Paleopathology Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
                Article
                ACTA-91-110
                10.23750/abm.v91i4.9674
                7927479
                33525297
                51eede9b-037c-45d1-b6f4-c5356bf2572d
                Copyright: © 2020 ACTA BIO MEDICA SOCIETY OF MEDICINE AND NATURAL SCIENCES OF PARMA

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

                History
                : 01 May 2020
                : 02 May 2020
                Categories
                Medical Humanities

                human remains,exhibition in museum,ethical issues,icom,nagpra

                Comments

                Comment on this article