Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Beyond the nation-state: Anchoring supranational institutions in international business research

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In this paper, we broaden the conceptualization of institutions beyond the nation-state and develop the concept of an institutional triality that represents two national institutional environments and the supranational level. While much of international business (IB) research has focused on national institutions and the differences between them, little attention and theorizing has been dedicated to the supranational institutions that form an integral part of the global institutional ecosystem. First, we conduct an interdisciplinary bibliometric survey on supranational institutions and a qualitative review of the central publications. Second, we initiate theory building and conceptualize supranational institutions from an IB point of view, distinguish them from related IB concepts, and discuss the conceptual properties of supranational institutions that are most relevant for MNCs. Building on these distinctions and properties, we provide a conceptual framework for understanding supranational institutions in the institutional triality. Third, we provide avenues for IB research building on the delineations, the conceptual properties, and the conceptual framework.

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1057/s41267-022-00537-3.

          Résumé

          Dans cet article, nous élargissons la conceptualisation des institutions au-delà de l'État-nation et développons le concept de trialité institutionnelle qui représente deux environnements institutionnels nationaux et le niveau supranational. Alors qu'une grande partie de la recherche en affaires internationales (International Business - IB) s'est focalisée sur les institutions nationales et les différences entre elles, peu d'attention et d’effort de théorisation sont consacrés aux institutions supranationales qui font partie intégrante de l'écosystème institutionnel global. Dans un premier temps, nous réalisons une enquête bibliométrique interdisciplinaire sur les institutions supranationales et une revue qualitative des principales publications. Ensuite, nous commençons la construction théorique et conceptualisons les institutions supranationales dans une perspective de l'IB. Nous les distinguons des concepts connexes de l'IB et discutons des propriétés conceptuelles des institutions supranationales qui sont les plus pertinentes pour les entreprises multinationales. Nous appuyant sur ces distinctions et ces propriétés, nous apportons un cadre conceptuel permettant de comprendre les institutions supranationales dans la trialité institutionnelle. Enfin, nous proposons des pistes de recherche en IB en partant sur les délimitations, les propriétés conceptuelles et le cadre conceptuel.

          Resumen

          En este trabajo ampliamos la conceptualización de las instituciones más allá del estado nación y desarrollamos el concepto de trialidad institucional que representa dos entornos institucionales nacionales y el nivel supranacional. Mientras que mucha de la investigación en negocios internacionales se ha enfocado en las instituciones nacionales y las diferencias entre ellas, poca atención y teorización se ha dedicado a las instituciones supranacionales que forman parte integral del ecosistema institucional global. Primero, llevamos a cabo un sondeo bibliométrico interdisciplinario sobre las instituciones supranacionales y una revisión cualitativa de las publicaciones centrales. Segundo, iniciamos una construcción teórica y a conceptualizar las instituciones supranacionales desde el punto de vista de negocios internacionales, diferenciándolas de otros conceptos relacionados en negocios internacionales, y discutimos las propiedades conceptuales de las instituciones supranacionales que son más relevantes para las empresas multinacionales. En base en estas diferencias y propiedades, proporcionamos un marco conceptual para entender las instituciones supranacionales en la trialidad instituciona. Tercero, proporcionamos posibilidades para la investigación en negocios internacionales sobre las delimitaciones, las propiedades conceptuales, y el marco conceptual.

          Resumo

          Neste artigo, ampliamos a conceituação de instituições para além do estado-nação e desenvolvemos o conceito de uma trialidade institucional que representa dois ambientes institucionais nacionais e o nível supranacional. Embora grande parte da pesquisa em negócios internacionais (IB) tenha se concentrado em instituições nacionais e nas diferenças entre elas, pouca atenção e teorização são dedicadas às instituições supranacionais que formam uma parte intrínseca do ecossistema institucional global. Primeiramente, realizamos um levantamento bibliométrico interdisciplinar em instituições supranacionais e uma revisão qualitativa das publicações centrais. Em segundo lugar, iniciamos a construção de teoria e conceituamos instituições supranacionais sob o ponto de vista de IB, distinguimo-las de conceitos relacionados a IB e discutimos as propriedades conceituais de instituições supranacionais que são mais relevantes para MNCs. Com base nessas diferenças e propriedades, fornecemos um modelo conceitual para entender as instituições supranacionais na trialidade institucional. Terceiro, fornecemos caminhos para construção de pesquisa em IB sobre delineações, propriedades conceituais e modelo conceitual.

          Translated abstract

          在本文中, 我们拓宽了民族国家之外的制度概念, 并提出了代表两个国家制度环境和超国家层面的制度三隅对称性概念。尽管大部分国际商务 (IB) 研究都集中在国家制度及它们之间的差异上, 构成全球制度生态系统组成部分的超国家制度很少被关注和理论化。首先, 我们对超国家制度进行跨学科文献计量调查, 并对核心出版物进行定性综述。其次, 我们从 IB 角度对超国家制度启动理论建设和概念化, 将它们与相关的 IB 概念区分开来, 并讨论与跨国公司最相关的超国家制度的概念属性。基于这些区分和属性, 我们提供了一个概念框架来理解制度三隅对称性中的超国家制度。第三, 我们为基于描述、概念属性和概念框架的 IB 研究提供了途径。

          Related collections

          Most cited references172

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Measuring Economic Policy Uncertainty

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                simon.hartmann@wu.ac.at
                thomas.lindner@uibk.ac.at
                jakob.muellner@wu.ac.at
                jonas.puck@wu.ac.at
                Journal
                J Int Bus Stud
                J Int Bus Stud
                Journal of International Business Studies
                Palgrave Macmillan UK (London )
                0047-2506
                1478-6990
                27 June 2022
                27 June 2022
                : 1-25
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.15788.33, ISNI 0000 0001 1177 4763, Institute for International Business, , Vienna University of Economics and Business, ; Wien, Austria
                [2 ]GRID grid.5771.4, ISNI 0000 0001 2151 8122, International Management Group, Institute for Strategic Management, Marketing, and Tourism, , University of Innsbruck, ; Innsbruck, Austria
                Article
                537
                10.1057/s41267-022-00537-3
                9244025
                51ce4d37-b64b-4c8b-ab94-359870d978f0
                © The Author(s) 2022

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 26 February 2021
                : 8 April 2022
                : 16 April 2022
                Funding
                Funded by: Vienna University of Economics and Business (WU)
                Categories
                Review Article

                institutional theory,multinational corporations,international organizations,supranational institutions

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content14

                Cited by7

                Most referenced authors1,005