4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Barriers and drivers to stakeholder engagement in global mental health projects

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Engagement with diverse stakeholders, including policy makers, care providers and service users and communities, is essential for successful implementation of global mental health interventions. Despite being a fundamental factor in the implementation process, evidence about challenges and drivers to stakeholder engagement is limited in the global mental health literature.

          Methods

          We conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with 29 recipients of Grand Challenges Canada Global Mental Health funding to assess barriers and drivers to global mental health implementation across a portfolio of projects. We used framework analysis to identify key themes related to implementation barriers and drivers. This paper reports on barriers and drivers to stakeholder engagement, with results related to capacity development and service delivery reported elsewhere in this journal.

          Results

          Barriers and drivers to stakeholder engagement were identified across four themes: (1) Contextual Considerations, (2) Resources, (3) Participation, Uptake and Empowerment, and (4) Stigma. While complex contextual challenges create barriers, mechanisms such as formative research can facilitate a deeper contextual understanding that supports effective implementation planning. Limited financial and human resources and competing priorities can lead to substantial challenges. Investing in and leveraging existing local resources and expertise can help to mitigate these barriers. The challenge of achieving active participation from stakeholders and diverging expectations about the nature of participation were identified as barriers, while providing opportunities for meaningful participation and empowerment acted as drivers. Stigma at the institutional, community and individual level was also identified as a substantial barrier to engagement.

          Conclusion

          The findings of this study are relevant to implementers in global mental health. They also have implications for global mental health funding agencies and policy organizations, who can support improved stakeholder engagement by investing in high-quality formative research, supporting capacity building for policy engagement, investing in longer-term funding schemes to support sustainable partnerships and scale-up, thus fostering successful engagement and supporting effective implementation of global mental health innovations.

          Related collections

          Most cited references39

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance

          Process evaluation is an essential part of designing and testing complex interventions. New MRC guidance provides a framework for conducting and reporting process evaluation studies
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The Lancet Commission on global mental health and sustainable development

            The Lancet, 392(10157), 1553-1598
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Enabling the implementation of evidence based practice: a conceptual framework

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Jill.murphy@ubc.ca
                Journal
                Int J Ment Health Syst
                Int J Ment Health Syst
                International Journal of Mental Health Systems
                BioMed Central (London )
                1752-4458
                3 April 2021
                3 April 2021
                2021
                : 15
                : 30
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.17091.3e, ISNI 0000 0001 2288 9830, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, , University of British Columbia, ; 2255 Westbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 2A1 Canada
                [2 ]GRID grid.8991.9, ISNI 0000 0004 0425 469X, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, ; Keppel St, Bloomsbury, London, WC1E 7HT UK
                [3 ]GRID grid.21729.3f, ISNI 0000000419368729, Department of Counseling and Clinical Psychology, Teachers College, , Columbia University, ; New York, NY USA
                [4 ]GRID grid.13097.3c, ISNI 0000 0001 2322 6764, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, , King’s College London, ; 16 De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF UK
                [5 ]GRID grid.32056.32, ISNI 0000 0001 2190 9326, Centre for Mental Health Law and Policy, , Indian Law Society, ; Pune, 411004 India
                [6 ]GRID grid.8991.9, ISNI 0000 0004 0425 469X, Centre for Global Mental Health, Department of Population Health, , London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, ; Keppel St, Bloomsbury, London, WC1E 7HT UK
                [7 ]GRID grid.52788.30, ISNI 0000 0004 0427 7672, Wellcome Trust, ; 215 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BE UK
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8613-4429
                Article
                458
                10.1186/s13033-021-00458-y
                8019163
                33812375
                50fe1498-158e-48e5-8819-17d6d67cdc97
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 28 September 2020
                : 27 March 2021
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Neurology
                global mental health,stakeholder engagement,implementation,policy engagement,low and middle income countries

                Comments

                Comment on this article