Colorectal cancer is the third leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide, and, thus,
understanding genetic changes driving cancer development and progression is critical.
A key breakthrough occurred 31 y ago when scientists cloned the tumor suppressor gene
adenomatous polyposis coli (APC), mutated in families with a predisposition to colon
cancer. Subsequent work revealed that APC is part of the destruction complex (DC),
a multiprotein machine that negatively regulates a key developmental signaling pathway,
the Wnt pathway (1). Wnt signaling regulates cell fate choice and adult stem cell
maintenance in all animals. However, key questions remain about the mechanisms by
which the DC works. In PNAS, Lach et al. (2) provide exciting insights.
Because of the power of Wnt signaling, evolution crafted mechanisms to keep signaling
firmly off in the ligand’s absence. Combined work in Drosophila, mice, and cultured
colorectal cancer cells provided important insights (3). The key event is regulating
stability of the Wnt effector β-catenin (βcat; Fig. 1A
). When present, it works with TCF family transcription factors to activate Wnt target
genes. To keep the pathway off, a multiprotein complex including APC, another large
scaffolding protein—Axin—and two protein kinases—glycogen synthase kinase-3 (GSK3)
and casein kinase 1-alpha (CK1)—captures and phosphorylates βcat, and then delivers
it to an E3 ubiquitin ligase, targeting it for proteolytic destruction. In tissues
where signaling is active, Wnt ligands bind a multiprotein receptor that turns down
DC activity, thus stabilizing cytoplasmic and nuclear βcat and activating gene expression.
In APC mutant colorectal cancers, βcat is stabilized even when signaling is off, activating
signaling constitutively.
Fig. 1.
Centrosomes nucleate formation of Wnt regulatory DCs. (A) Canonical Wnt regulation.
(B) When Axin is overexpressed in cells, it forms multiple puncta. (C) Hypothetical
multiprotein DC biomolecular condensate. (D) Axin expressed at endogenous levels assembles
into one or two puncta colocalizing with centrosomes. A–C were produced by laboratory
alumna Kristi Schaefer; D is from Max Wilson.
This textbook description sounds tidy, leaving the impression that the Wnt regulatory
mechanism is solved. However, key questions remain. For example, Axin alone can act
as a scaffold to bring the two kinases to βcat (4), leaving APC’s function unclear.
More puzzling, a series of studies suggested that a four-protein DC is not the whole
story. When Axin is expressed in cultured cells, it assembles into multiple “puncta,”
into which are recruited APC, the kinases, and βcat (e.g., refs. 5 and 6; Fig. 1B
). Axin’s DIX domain mediates protein polymerization (7), potentially driving assembly
of puncta containing many copies of each DC protein (Fig. 1C
).
This suggested that the DC might be a biomolecular condensate (reviewed in ref. 8).
These large, non-membrane-bound structures assemble by multivalent protein interactions,
some mediated by intrinsically disordered regions, thus generating large protein complexes
by “liquid–liquid phase separation” (9). DC proteins can phase separate in vitro (e.g.,
ref. 10). Further, elevated resolution microscopy revealed that Axin puncta seen in
cultured mammalian cells when Axin levels are elevated are structured multiprotein
complexes (11, 12). Similar complexes are seen in vivo in Drosophila embryos, with
Axin expressed only a few-fold above endogenous levels, and their subcellular localization
and assembly are regulated by upstream Wnt signals (13), suggesting that they are
functional. More than 100 Axins assemble in each punctum. However, other groups took
alternate approaches, building DCs from the bottom up from purified proteins, and
defining molecular interactions involved in assembly (14, 15). This was quite successful,
reconstituting, in one case, not only βcat phosphorylation but also ubiquitination
by the E3 ligase. The in vitro protein complexes were substantially smaller than those
seen in vivo, with ≤10 Axins in each. These data raised a key question: What is the
true assembly state of the DC in vivo?
Lach et al. (2) take this on via a highly multidisciplinary approach. They note that
phase-separating systems can exhibit switch-like responses to changes in concentration,
potentially explaining differences in DC assembly in vitro and in vivo. This occurs,
in part, because newly synthesized Axin or APC proteins must choose between joining
an existing complex or nucleating a new one. Their concentrations and posttranslational
modifications determine their location in a high-dimensional phase diagram, governing
whether these proteins remain diffuse, spontaneously demix into existing droplets,
or nucleate new condensates. Thus, precisely controlling protein expression levels
is key to defining the true assembly state. To visualize DCs at endogenous levels,
Lach et al. tagged the endogenous βcat gene with a fluorescent protein, and visualized
cells live. βcat accumulated at the plasma membrane in cadherin-based cell adhesion
complexes, while cytoplasmic levels were low in the absence of Wnt signaling. Wnt
signaling stabilized cytoplasmic βcat, as expected.
What was less expected was that, in the absence of Wnt signals, βcat also accumulated
in one or two bright, spherical puncta near the nuclei (2). These resembled liquid-like
biomolecular condensates, fusing and splitting. Importantly, puncta stability was
regulated by Wnt signaling: Adding Wnt ligands led to loss of puncta. To confirm this,
Lach et al. used an optogenetically controlled Wnt receptor, which was activated by
light. Activating the receptor also led to puncta dissolution. Similar puncta were
observed with Axin tagged at its endogenous locus, eliminating worries about overexpression
(Fig. 1D
). The assembled puncta contain all DC proteins, which could come in and out of puncta
readily and rapidly, consistent with known biomolecular condensate properties. Together,
these data suggested the puncta are the active DC.
Most intriguing, the one or two puncta per cell colocalized with centrosomes, the
cell’s major microtubule organizing center (2). Lach et al. confirmed that puncta
and centrosomes exclusively colocalized when Axin was expressed at endogenous levels,
but, when they used inducible expression to elevate Axin levels, multiple extracentrosomal
DC puncta formed. These data suggested centrosomes regulate DC assembly by serving
as nucleation sites. At the lower endogenous levels of Axin, centrosomes might locally
concentrate Axin or other DC proteins enough to trigger Axin multimerization and thus
phase transition. Lach et al. first tested this by mathematically modeling DC assembly
and function, contrasting predicted rates of βcat phosphorylation with or without
a “nucleator.” Strikingly, their models predicted that nucleation strongly accelerates
βcat phosphorylation over a wide range of parameters, improving DC efficiency.
Lach et al. (2) then created a tool to test whether condensation elevates Wnt regulatory
activity in vivo: a version of the DC kinase GSK3 that oligomerizes in response to
light. Strikingly, inducing GSK3 oligomerization rapidly increased GSK3 concentration
specifically in centrosomal puncta, without triggering assembly of extracentrosomal
puncta. Further, GSK3 oligomerization prevented Wnt signaling from turning down the
DC, and inhibited Wnt-induced human embryonic stem cell differentiation, putting the
work into the context of normal Wnt signaling.
Together, this work provides key insights into Wnt signaling, helping reconcile earlier
in vitro, cell culture and in vivo experiments concerning the DC assembly state (2).
These data reveal that, at least in cultured mammalian cells, DCs form phase-separated
biomolecular condensates even when proteins are all expressed at endogenous levels.
Lach et al.'s modeling suggests this increases efficiency of targeting βcat for phosphorylation
and thus destruction. This work also suggests that earlier experiments suggesting
the presence of many such puncta likely resulted from Axin overexpression, confirming
the very tight concentration threshold for condensate formation. In their system,
centrosomes nucleate condensates, triggering condensation just below the normal concentration
threshold. This aspect will have broader relevance, as similar concentration-dependent
behaviors and nucleation mechanisms may regulate other important biomolecular condensates.
This work (2) also raises many exciting questions. Which protein interactions mediate
centrosomal recruitment? Which molecular interactions then trigger condensation? Candidates
include Axin polymerization, APC’s Armadillo repeats, and APC’s enigmatic CID/R2-B
motif (11, 16, 17). We also must define how APC protein truncations seen in colorectal
tumors affect condensate assembly or function. The data open questions about mechanisms
that regulate condensate. It was striking that GSK3 oligomerization rendered DCs immune
to disassembly by Wnt signaling—in addition to phosphorylating βcat, GSK3 also phosphorylates
Axin and APC, and GSK3 phosphorylation of APC’s CID/R2-B motif may regulate assembly
(11). Handoff to the E3 ubiquitin ligase is the next step in targeting βcat for destruction.
We must determine whether and how the E3 ligase is recruited to centrosomal condensates.
The E3 F-box protein TrCP can localize to centrosomes (18), and in vitro work supports
physical interaction of E3 ligase and DC proteins (12, 19).
While localization of individual DC proteins to centrosomes was known, the centrosome’s
role in nucleation was a surprise. However, it opens new questions. Both mouse embryos
(20) and Drosophila (21) lacking centrioles can survive without noticeable defects
in Wnt signaling, revealing that centrosomes are not essential for this process. What
other cellular structures might serve as nucleation sites? Finally, as the authors
note (2), it will be important to use their system in partnership with in vitro approaches
to define how Wnt signaling acts through the Wnt receptor complex to activate Dishevelled
and turn down DC activity. It will be exciting to see how complementary approaches
help tackle these key issues in cell, developmental, and cancer biology.