14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Rome IV Diagnostic Questionnaires and Tables for Investigators and Clinicians.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The Rome IV Diagnostic Questionnaires were developed to screen for functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs), serve as inclusion criteria in clinical trials, and support epidemiological surveys. Separate questionnaires were developed for adults, children/adolescents, and infants/toddlers. For the adult questionnaire, we first surveyed 1,162 adults without gastrointestinal disorders, and recommended the 90(th) percentile symptom frequency as the threshold for defining what is abnormal. Diagnostic questions were formulated and verified with clinical experts using a recursive process. The diagnostic sensitivity of the questionnaire was tested in 843 patients from 9 gastroenterology clinics, with a focus on clinical diagnoses of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), functional constipation (FC), and functional dyspepsia (FD). Sensitivity was 62.7% for IBS, 54.7% for FD, and 32.2% for FC. Specificity, assessed in a population sample of 5,931 adults, was 97.1% for IBS, 93.3% for FD, and 93.6% for FC. Excess overlap among IBS, FC, and FD was a major contributor to reduced diagnostic sensitivity, and when overlap of IBS with FC was permitted, sensitivity for FC diagnosis increased to 73.2%. All questions were understandable to at least 90% of individuals, and Rome IV diagnoses were reproducible in ¾ of patients after one month. Validation of the pediatric questionnaires is ongoing.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Gastroenterology
          Gastroenterology
          Elsevier BV
          1528-0012
          0016-5085
          Feb 13 2016
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Bioinformatics Building Room 4111, Campus Box 7080, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7080.
          [2 ] Bioinformatics Building Room 4112, Campus Box 7080, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
          [3 ] Bioinformatics Building Room 4008 Campus Box 7080 University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7080.
          [4 ] Center for Neurobiology of Stress, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA Los Angeles,California.
          [5 ] Division of Gastroenterology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
          [6 ] Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona.
          [7 ] Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
          [8 ] Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
          [9 ] Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
          [10 ] Director, Digestive Health Center, Medical College of GeorgiaGeorgia Regents University, Augusta, Georgia.
          [11 ] Kibbutz Farod, House 86, D.N. Bikat Bet Hakerem, 2010000, Israel.
          [12 ] Mt. Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
          [13 ] K. U. Leuven, Center for GI Research, Herestraat 49, Leuven 3000, Belgium.
          [14 ] Division of Gastroenterology, Kingston General Hospital, Ontario, Canada.
          [15 ] Department of Pediatrics, Adolescent Division, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 2146 Belcourt Ave, Nashville TN 37212.
          [16 ] University Hospital of South Manchester, United Kingdom.
          [17 ] Chinese PLA General Hospital Beijing, China.
          Article
          S0016-5085(16)00180-3
          10.1053/j.gastro.2016.02.014
          27144634
          508e501a-113d-4280-b38a-d1e9b5b98640
          History

          Functional constipation,Functional dyspepsia,Functional gastrointestinal disorder,Irritable bowel syndrome,Sensitivity,Specificity,Validation

          Comments

          Comment on this article