3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares

      Submit your digital health research with an established publisher
      - celebrating 25 years of open access

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Changes in the Clinical Practice of Mental Health Service Providers Throughout the COVID-19 Pandemic: Longitudinal Questionnaire Study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The COVID-19 pandemic impacted the practices of most mental health providers and resulted in a rapid transition to providing telemental health services, changes that were likely related to stay-at-home policies as well as increased need for services.

          Objective

          The aim of this study was to examine whether these changes to practice have been sustained over time throughout the course of the COVID-19 pandemic and whether there are differences among mental health provider type and setting. We hypothesized that there would be an increase in the number of patients seen in person after the initial surge of the pandemic in spring 2020 and subsequent discontinuation of stay-at-home policies, though with continued implementation of telemental health services across settings.

          Methods

          This study surveyed 235 of the 903 mental health providers who responded to a survey in spring 2020 (Time point 1) and at a 1-year follow-up in spring 2021 (Time point 2). Differences in practice adjustments, factors related to telemental health, and number of patients seen were examined across provider type (social worker, psychologist, neuropsychologist) and setting (academic medical center [AMC], community mental health, private practice, and Veterans Affairs hospital).

          Results

          From Time point 1 to Time point 2, there was a small but significant increase in the overall number of providers who were implementing telehealth (191/235, 81% to 204/235, 87%, P=.01) and there was a significant decline in canceled or rescheduled appointments (25%-50% in 2020 to 3%-7% in 2021, P<.001). Psychologists and providers working at AMCs reported decreased difficulty with telehealth implementation ( P<.001), and providers working at AMCs and in private practice settings indicated they were more likely to continue telehealth services beyond spring 2021 ( P<.001). The percent of time working remotely decreased overall (78% to 59%, P<.001), which was most notable among neuropsychologists and providers working at an AMC. There was an overall increase in the average number of patients seen in person per week compared with earlier in the pandemic (mean 4.3 to 8.7, P<.001), with no change in the number of patients seen via telehealth (mean 9.7 to 9.9, P=.66).

          Conclusions

          These results show that the rapid transition to telemental health at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in spring 2020 was sustained over the next year, despite an overall increase in the number of patients seen in person. Although more providers reported returning to working on-site, over 50% of providers continued to use a hybrid model, and many providers reported they would be more likely to continue telemental health beyond spring 2021. This suggests the continued importance and reliance on telemental health services beyond the acute pandemic phase and has implications for future policies regulating the availability of telemental health services to patients.

          Related collections

          Most cited references34

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Mental Health and the Covid-19 Pandemic

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              COVID-19 and mental health: A review of the existing literature

              Highlights • Subsyndromal mental health concerns are a common response to the COVID-19 outbreak. • These responses affect both the general public and healthcare workers. • Depressive and anxiety symptoms have been reported in 16–28% of subjects screened. • Novel methods of consultation, such as online services, can be helpful for these patients. • There is a need for further long-term research in this area, especially from other countries
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                JMIR Form Res
                JMIR Form Res
                JFR
                JMIR Formative Research
                JMIR Publications (Toronto, Canada )
                2561-326X
                2024
                29 April 2024
                : 8
                : e50303
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Behavioral Medicine and Psychiatry Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute West Virginia University School of Medicine Morgantown, WV United States
                [2 ] Atrium Health Charlotte, NC United States
                [3 ] Department of Neuroscience Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute West Virginia University School of Medicine Morgantown, WV United States
                [4 ] Department of Neurology University of Virginia Health Charlottesville, VA United States
                Author notes
                Corresponding Author: Nicholas Jasinski nicholas.jasinski1@ 123456hsc.wvu.edu
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3647-0499
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2411-9463
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8605-9796
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8249-3093
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2279-0595
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4118-4021
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8698-5442
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0824-1776
                Article
                v8i1e50303
                10.2196/50303
                11060325
                38683653
                50408d6c-111d-45c5-9099-b6ce5516a65d
                ©Milena Gotra, Katharine Lindberg, Nicholas Jasinski, David Scarisbrick, Shannon Reilly, Jonathan Perle, Liv Miller, James Mahoney III. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (https://formative.jmir.org), 29.04.2024.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Formative Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://formative.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.

                History
                : 26 June 2023
                : 29 November 2023
                : 4 March 2024
                : 6 March 2024
                Categories
                Original Paper
                Original Paper

                covid-19 pandemic,mental health,social worker,psychologist,neuropsychologist,academic medical center,community mental health,private practice,veteran’s affairs hospital,longitudinal questionnaire study,covid-19,implementation,telemental health,hybrid model,availability

                Comments

                Comment on this article