12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Differential effects of negative emotion on memory for items and associations, and their relationship to intrusive imagery

      review-article
      1 , 2 , 1 , 2
      Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
      Elsevier B. V

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Highlights

          • Negative emotion can affect memory for items and associations differentially.

          • Strengthened item memory reflected in increased amygdala activity.

          • Weakened contextual/associative memory reflected in reduced hippocampal activity.

          • Imbalance between strong negative items and weak contextual associations predicts intrusions.

          Abstract

          A crucial aspect of episodic memory formation is the way in which our experiences are stored within a coherent spatio-temporal context. We review research that highlights how the experience of a negative event can alter memory encoding in a complex manner, strengthening negative items but weakening associations with other items and the surrounding context. Recent evidence suggests that these opposing effects can occur through amygdala up-modulation to facilitate item encoding, while the hippocampal provision of contextual binding is down-modulated. We consider how these characteristics of memory for negative events might contribute to the development and maintenance of distressing intrusive imagery in posttraumatic stress disorder, and how they should influence therapeutic interventions.

          Related collections

          Most cited references54

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Smaller hippocampal volume predicts pathologic vulnerability to psychological trauma.

          In animals, exposure to severe stress can damage the hippocampus. Recent human studies show smaller hippocampal volume in individuals with the stress-related psychiatric condition posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Does this represent the neurotoxic effect of trauma, or is smaller hippocampal volume a pre-existing condition that renders the brain more vulnerable to the development of pathological stress responses? In monozygotic twins discordant for trauma exposure, we found evidence that smaller hippocampi indeed constitute a risk factor for the development of stress-related psychopathology. Disorder severity in PTSD patients who were exposed to trauma was negatively correlated with the hippocampal volume of both the patients and the patients' trauma-unexposed identical co-twin. Furthermore, severe PTSD twin pairs-both the trauma-exposed and unexposed members-had significantly smaller hippocampi than non-PTSD pairs.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Remembering the past and imagining the future: a neural model of spatial memory and imagery.

            The authors model the neural mechanisms underlying spatial cognition, integrating neuronal systems and behavioral data, and address the relationships between long-term memory, short-term memory, and imagery, and between egocentric and allocentric and visual and ideothetic representations. Long-term spatial memory is modeled as attractor dynamics within medial-temporal allocentric representations, and short-term memory is modeled as egocentric parietal representations driven by perception, retrieval, and imagery and modulated by directed attention. Both encoding and retrieval/imagery require translation between egocentric and allocentric representations, which are mediated by posterior parietal and retrosplenial areas and the use of head direction representations in Papez's circuit. Thus, the hippocampus effectively indexes information by real or imagined location, whereas Papez's circuit translates to imagery or from perception according to the direction of view. Modulation of this translation by motor efference allows spatial updating of representations, whereas prefrontal simulated motor efference allows mental exploration. The alternating temporal-parietal flows of information are organized by the theta rhythm. Simulations demonstrate the retrieval and updating of familiar spatial scenes, hemispatial neglect in memory, and the effects on hippocampal place cell firing of lesioned head direction representations and of conflicting visual and ideothetic inputs. (c) 2007 APA, all rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Neural systems underlying the suppression of unwanted memories.

              M Anderson (2004)
              Over a century ago, Freud proposed that unwanted memories can be excluded from awareness, a process called repression. It is unknown, however, how repression occurs in the brain. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging to identify the neural systems involved in keeping unwanted memories out of awareness. Controlling unwanted memories was associated with increased dorsolateral prefrontal activation, reduced hippocampal activation, and impaired retention of those memories. Both prefrontal cortical and right hippocampal activations predicted the magnitude of forgetting. These results confirm the existence of an active forgetting process and establish a neurobiological model for guiding inquiry into motivated forgetting.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Curr Opin Behav Sci
                Curr Opin Behav Sci
                Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
                Elsevier B. V
                2352-1546
                2352-1554
                1 October 2017
                October 2017
                : 17
                : 124-132
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London, UK
                [2 ]Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
                Article
                S2352-1546(17)30032-3
                10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.07.012
                5719982
                29238740
                503da511-f640-4cf8-827d-7a6212260bcb
                © 2017 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                Categories
                Article

                Comments

                Comment on this article