Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
36
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    8
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      CEMRA in neonatal and pediatric congenital vascular diseases at 1.5T and 3.0T: comparison of an intravascular contrast agent (Gadofosveset) with an extracellular agent (Gadopentetate Dimeglumine)

      research-article
      1 , 1 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 3 , 1 , 1 ,
      Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
      BioMed Central
      16th Annual SCMR Scientific Sessions
      31 January-3 February 2013

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background Compare gadofosveset (Ablavar, Lantheus Medical) at a dose of 0.06 mmol /kg with gadopentetate dimeglumine (Magnevist, Bayer-Schering Inc.) at a dose of 0.2 mmol /kg for CEMRA in pediatric patients with complex congenital heart disease (CCHD) at 1.5T and 3.0T. Methods Twenty-eight pediatric patients with CCHD underwent CEMRA at 3.0T (n=16) or at 1.5T (n=12). Sixteen patients were imaged with gadofosveset; 9 at 3.0T (age 1.00 ± 1.58 months; weight 2.38 ± 1.13 kg) and 7 at 1.5T (age 8.00 ± 7.83 months; weight 5.06 ± 3.09 kg). Twelve patients were imaged with gadopentetate; 7 at 3.0T (age 1.00 ± 1.41 months; weight 3.02 ± 1.59 kg) and 5 at 1.5T (age 6.60 ± 8.62 months; weight 5.23 ± 2.93 kg). High resolution CEMRA was performed in two phases with strictly comparable imaging parameters, acquisition times and contrast agent infusion periods. Two independent observers scored the studies blindly on a four point scale for image quality, artifacts and vessel definition. Results At 3.0T, overall image quality (IQ) was good to excellent (3<=IQ<=4) in all patients and similar for gadofosveset and gadopentate. At 1.5T, IQ was also good to excellent, but higher for gadofosveset than gadopentetate. Cardiac motion or pulsation artifact was found in all studies at both field strengths but appeared more severe at 3.0T than 1.5T. Parallel acquisition artifact was noted in all studies at 3.0T, but in no studies at 1.5T. Vessel definition scores were higher for gadofosveset than gadopentetate in the venous phases at 3.0T and 1.5T. SNR and CNR was higher at 3.0T than 1.5T in the aortic arch, pulmonary artery, inferior vena cava and superior vena cava. SNR and CNR was higher for gadofosveset than gadopentetate during the arterial phase in the aortic arch and pulmonary artery. Figure 1 4 day old neonate, 2.27kg, with interrupted aortic arch, large patent ductus arteriosus, large atrial and ventricular septal defects, aberrant right subclavian artery. MR performed at 3.0T with gadofosveset. Volume rendered reconstruction anterior view (left) with hypoplastic ascending aorta and posterior view (right) with interrupted aortic arch. Conclusions Both gadofosveset and gadopentetate support reliable and high quality CEMRA at 1.5T and 3.0T in children with complex congenital vascular diseases. However, gadofosveset scored higher than gadopentetate with respect to image quality, vessel definition, SNR and CNR at less than one third the dose of Gadolinium. Furthermore, the prolonged intravascular residence time of gadofosveset enabled the maximum duration of breath holding to be halved relative to gadopentetate, while maintaining excellent enhancement in the venous phase. Funding Siemens Research Grant

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Conference
          J Cardiovasc Magn Reson
          J Cardiovasc Magn Reson
          Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
          BioMed Central
          1097-6647
          1532-429X
          2013
          30 January 2013
          : 15
          : Suppl 1
          : W32
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Radiology, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
          [2 ]Pediatric Cardiology, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
          [3 ]Anesthesia, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
          Article
          1532-429X-15-S1-W32
          10.1186/1532-429X-15-S1-W32
          3560090
          501d0d55-8b0e-4b73-ae31-9e778e4e3068
          Copyright ©2013 Khan et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

          This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

          16th Annual SCMR Scientific Sessions
          San Francisco, CA, USA
          31 January-3 February 2013
          History
          Categories
          Workshop Presentation

          Cardiovascular Medicine
          Cardiovascular Medicine

          Comments

          Comment on this article

          scite_
          0
          0
          0
          0
          Smart Citations
          0
          0
          0
          0
          Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
          View Citations

          See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

          scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

          Similar content224