2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      IMbrave150: Updated overall survival (OS) data from a global, randomized, open-label phase III study of atezolizumab (atezo) + bevacizumab (bev) versus sorafenib (sor) in patients (pts) with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          267

          Background: Atezo + bev has been approved globally for pts with unresectable HCC who have not received prior systemic therapy, based on results from IMbrave150 (NCT03434379). At a median of 8.6 mo follow-up, both coprimary endpoints were met, with statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements observed with atezo + bev vs sor for OS (HR, 0.58 [95% CI, 0.42, 0.79]; P<0.001) and independently-assessed progression-free survival (PFS; per RECIST 1.1; HR, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.47, 0.76]; P<0.001) (Finn, et al. N Engl J Med 2020). Here, we report an updated OS analysis for IMbrave150. Methods: The global, multicenter, randomized, open-label, Phase III study IMbrave150 enrolled 501 systemic treatment–naive pts with unresectable HCC, ≥1 measurable untreated lesion (RECIST 1.1), Child-Pugh class A liver function and ECOG PS 0/1. Pts were randomized 2:1 to receive either atezo 1200 mg IV q3w + bev 15 mg/kg IV q3w or sor 400 mg bid until unacceptable toxicity or loss of clinical benefit per investigator. This post hoc, descriptive OS analysis was conducted with 12 mo of additional follow up from the primary analysis. Results: 501 pts were enrolled, including 336 to atezo + bev and 165 to sor. At the clinical cut-off date of Aug 31, 2020, median follow-up was 15.6 mo and 280 OS events were observed. Median OS was 19.2 mo with atezo + bev vs 13.4 mo with sor (HR, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.52, 0.85]; P=0.0009). Survival at 18 mo was 52% with atezo + bev and 40% with sor. Survival benefit with atezo + bev over sor was generally consistent across subgroups and with the primary analysis. The updated objective response rate (ORR; 29.8% per RECIST 1.1) with atezo + bev was in line with the primary analysis, with more pts achieving complete response (CR; 7.7%) than previously reported. Additional response data are in Table. Safety was aligned with the primary analysis, with no new signals identified. Conclusions: IMbrave150 showed consistent clinically meaningful treatment benefit and safety with 12 mo of additional follow-up. The combination provides the longest survival seen in a front-line Phase III study in advanced HCC, confirming atezo + bev as a standard of care for previously untreated, unresectable HCC. Clinical trial information: NCT03434379. [Table: see text]

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Journal of Clinical Oncology
          JCO
          American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
          0732-183X
          1527-7755
          January 20 2021
          January 20 2021
          : 39
          : 3_suppl
          : 267
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA;
          [2 ]People’s Liberation Army Cancer Center, Nanjing, China;
          [3 ]National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan;
          [4 ]University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany;
          [5 ]Gustave Roussy Cancer Center, Villejuif, France;
          [6 ]Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea;
          [7 ]Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea;
          [8 ]Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan;
          [9 ]N.N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center, Moscow, Russian Federation;
          [10 ]University Hospital La Croix-Rousse, Lyon, France;
          [11 ]The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX;
          [12 ]City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center and Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, CA;
          [13 ]Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA;
          [14 ]Roche Product Development, Shanghai, China;
          [15 ]Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA;
          [16 ]National Taiwan University Cancer Center and National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan;
          Article
          10.1200/JCO.2021.39.3_suppl.267
          50041ac4-da2e-4c01-902e-9481fa6dd6d4
          © 2021
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article