57
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Performance of a Multigene Genomic Classifier in Thyroid Nodules With Indeterminate Cytology : A Prospective Blinded Multicenter Study

      research-article
      , MD 1 , , MD 2 , , MD 3 , , MBBS, MRCP, MMed 4 , , MD, MA 5 , 6 , , MD 7 , , MD, MBA 8 , , MD, MPH 9 , , MD 10 , , MD 11 , , MD, PhD 12 , , MD, PhD 13 , , MD 14 , , MS 15 , , MD 11 , , MD 11 , , MD, PhD 16 , , MD 8 , , MD 7 , , MD 11 , , MBBS 17 , , MD 18 , , MD 10 , , MD 2 , , MBBS 19 , , MBBS, MRCS, MMed 20 , , MD 14 , , MD 21 , , MD 7 , , Md, PhD 22 , , MD 2 , , MD, PhD 14 ,
      JAMA Oncology
      American Medical Association

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Key Points

          Question

          Can the diagnosis of benign disease or cancer in thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology be established by molecular testing instead of diagnostic surgery?

          Findings

          This prospective, blinded, multicenter cohort study of a multigene genomic classifier (ThyroSeq v3) test included 257 indeterminate cytology thyroid nodules with informative test results. It demonstrated a high sensitivity (94%) and reasonably high specificity (82%), with 61% of the nodules yielding a negative test result and only 3% residual cancer risk in these nodules.

          Meanings

          Up to 61% of patients with indeterminate cytology thyroid nodules may avoid diagnostic surgery by undergoing multigene genomic classifier testing.

          Abstract

          This prospective study examines the diagnostic accuracy of a multigene genomic classifier test for diagnosis of benign disease or cancer in thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology.

          Abstract

          Importance

          Approximately 20% of fine-needle aspirations (FNA) of thyroid nodules have indeterminate cytology, most frequently Bethesda category III or IV. Diagnostic surgeries can be avoided for these patients if the nodules are reliably diagnosed as benign without surgery.

          Objective

          To determine the diagnostic accuracy of a multigene classifier (GC) test (ThyroSeq v3) for cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules.

          Design, Setting, and Participants

          Prospective, blinded cohort study conducted at 10 medical centers, with 782 patients with 1013 nodules enrolled. Eligibility criteria were met in 256 patients with 286 nodules; central pathology review was performed on 274 nodules.

          Interventions

          A total of 286 FNA samples from thyroid nodules underwent molecular analysis using the multigene GC (ThyroSeq v3).

          Main Outcomes and Measures

          The primary outcome was diagnostic accuracy of the test for thyroid nodules with Bethesda III and IV cytology. The secondary outcome was prediction of cancer by specific genetic alterations in Bethesda III to V nodules.

          Results

          Of the 286 cytologically indeterminate nodules, 206 (72%) were benign, 69 (24%) malignant, and 11 (4%) noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasms with papillary-like nuclei (NIFTP). A total of 257 (90%) nodules (154 Bethesda III, 93 Bethesda IV, and 10 Bethesda V) had informative GC analysis, with 61% classified as negative and 39% as positive. In Bethesda III and IV nodules combined, the test demonstrated a 94% (95% CI, 86%-98%) sensitivity and 82% (95% CI, 75%-87%) specificity. With a cancer/NIFTP prevalence of 28%, the negative predictive value (NPV) was 97% (95% CI, 93%-99%) and the positive predictive value (PPV) was 66% (95% CI, 56%-75%). The observed 3% false-negative rate was similar to that of benign cytology, and the missed cancers were all low-risk tumors. Among nodules testing positive, specific groups of genetic alterations had cancer probabilities varying from 59% to 100%.

          Conclusions and Relevance

          In this prospective, blinded, multicenter study, the multigene GC test demonstrated a high sensitivity/NPV and reasonably high specificity/PPV, which may obviate diagnostic surgery in up to 61% of patients with Bethesda III to IV indeterminate nodules, and up to 82% of all benign nodules with indeterminate cytology. Information on specific genetic alterations obtained from FNA may help inform individualized treatment of patients with a positive test result.

          Related collections

          Most cited references31

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          European Thyroid Association Guidelines for Ultrasound Malignancy Risk Stratification of Thyroid Nodules in Adults: The EU-TIRADS

          Thyroid ultrasound (US) is a key examination for the management of thyroid nodules. Thyroid US is easily accessible, noninvasive, and cost-effective, and is a mandatory step in the workup of thyroid nodules. The main disadvantage of the method is that it is operator dependent. Thyroid US assessment of the risk of malignancy is crucial in patients with nodules, in order to select those who should have a fine needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy performed. Due to the pivotal role of thyroid US in the management of patients with nodules, the European Thyroid Association convened a panel of international experts to set up European guidelines on US risk stratification of thyroid nodules. Based on a review of the literature and on the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, American Thyroid Association, and Korean guidelines, the panel created the novel European Thyroid Imaging and Reporting Data System, called EU-TIRADS. This comprises a thyroid US lexicon; a standardized report; definitions of benign and low-, intermediate-, and high-risk nodules, with the estimated risks of malignancy in each category; and indications for FNA. Illustrated by numerous US images, the EU-TIRADS aims to serve physicians in their clinical practice, to enhance the interobserver reproducibility of descriptions, and to simplify communication of the results.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology: a meta-analysis.

            We aimed to investigate the validity of the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC) through meta-analysis. All publications between January 1, 2008 and September 1, 2011 that studied TBSRTC and had available histological follow-up data were retrieved. To calculate the sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy, the cases diagnosed as follicular neoplasm, suspicious for malignancy and malignant which were histopathologically confirmed as malignant were defined as true-positive. True-negative included benign cases confirmed as benign on histopathology. The nondiagnostic category was excluded from the statistical calculation. The correlations between the 6 diagnostic categories were investigated. The publications review resulted in a case cohort of 25,445 thyroid fine-needle aspirations, 6,362 (25%) of which underwent surgical excision; this group constituted the basis of the study. The sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy were 97, 50.7 and 68.8%, respectively. The positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 55.9 and 96.3%, respectively. The rates of false negatives and false positives were low: 3 and 0.5%, respectively. The results of meta-analysis showed high overall accuracy, indicating that TBSRTC represents a reliable and valid reporting system for thyroid cytology. Copyright © 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The Diagnosis and Management of Thyroid Nodules

              Thyroid nodules are common, being detected in up to 65% of the general population. This is likely due to the increased use of diagnostic imaging for purposes unrelated to the thyroid. Most thyroid nodules are benign, clinically insignificant, and safely managed with a surveillance program. The main goal of initial and long-term follow-up is identification of the small subgroup of nodules that harbor a clinically significant cancer (≈10%), cause compressive symptoms (≈5%), or progress to functional disease (≈5%).
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA Oncol
                JAMA Oncol
                JAMA Oncol
                JAMA Oncology
                American Medical Association
                2374-2437
                2374-2445
                8 November 2018
                February 2019
                13 December 2018
                8 November 2018
                : 5
                : 2
                : 204-212
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
                [2 ]Division of Endocrine Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennslyvania
                [3 ]Division of Endocrine Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison
                [4 ]Endocrinology Division, Department of Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
                [5 ]Section of Endocrine Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke Cancer Institute and Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
                [6 ]Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco
                [7 ]Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, The Ohio State University School of Medicine, Columbus
                [8 ]Diabetes & Endocrine Care, St Peter's Health Partners, Rensselaer, New York
                [9 ]Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
                [10 ]Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Diabetes, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora
                [11 ]Department of Medicine, Endocrinology Section, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC
                [12 ]Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
                [13 ]Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison
                [14 ]Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
                [15 ]Biostatistics Facility, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
                [16 ]Departments of Otolaryngology and Immunology, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
                [17 ]Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, National University Hospital, Singapore
                [18 ]Department of Pathology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
                [19 ]Department of Pathology, National University Hospital, Singapore
                [20 ]Department of General Surgery, University Surgical Cluster, National University Hospital, Singapore
                [21 ]Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism, University of Wisconsin, Madison
                [22 ]Department Pathology, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
                Author notes
                Article Information
                Corresponding Author: Yuri E. Nikiforov, MD, PhD, Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, 3477 Euler Way, Rm 8031, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 ( nikiforovye@ 123456upmc.edu ).
                Accepted for Publication: August 10, 2018.
                Correction: This article was corrected on December 13, 2018, to fix typographical errors in the Methods section and Table 2 and to replace the term "neoplastic disease" with "surgery-requiring disease" in the Results section.
                Published Online: November 8, 2018. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.4616
                Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. © 2018 Steward DL et al. JAMA Oncology.
                Author Contributions: Dr Nikiforov had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and accuracy of the data analysis.
                Study concept and design: Steward, Haugen, Baloch, Nikiforov.
                Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Steward, Carty, Sippel, S. Yang, Sosa, Sipos, Figge, Mandel, Haugen, Burman, Lloyd, Seethala, Gooding, Chiosea, Gomes-Lima, Ferris, Folek, Khawaja, Kundra, Loh, Marshall, Mayson, McCoy, En Nga, Ngiam, Nikiforova, Poehls, Ringel, H. Yang, Yip, Nikiforov.
                Drafting of the manuscript: Steward, Carty, Mandel, Haugen, Baloch, McCoy, Ringel, Nikiforov.
                Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Steward, Carty, Sippel, S. Yang, Sosa, Sipos, Figge, Mandel, Haugen, Burman, Baloch, Lloyd, Seethala, Gooding, Chiosea, Gomes-Lima, Ferris, Folek, Khawaja, Kundra, Loh, Marshall, Mayson, McCoy, En Nga, Ngiam, Nikiforova, Poehls, H. Yang, Yip.
                Statistical analysis: Mandel, Gooding.
                Obtained funding: Nikiforova, Ringel, H. Yang, Nikiforov.
                Administrative, technical, or material support: Sippel, S. Yang, Sosa, Sipos, Burman, Chiosea, Ferris, Khawaja, Kundra, Loh, Mayson, En Nga, Ngiam, Nikiforov.
                Study supervision: Carty, Figge, Haugen, Ferris, Kundra, McCoy, Nikiforov.
                Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Burman received Institutional Grants for Clinical Trials from AstraZeneca, Eisai, IBSA, Bayer, and Loxo. Drs Carty, Ferris, McCoy, Seethala, and Yip are employees of University of Pittsburgh Physicians, which is an affiliate of University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC). The University of Pittsburgh Medical Center has granted CBLPath Inc. a license to market ThyroSeq for commercial use. They receive no compensation, directly or indirectly, related to CBLPath Inc. Dr Chiosea receives compensation from his employer (UPMC) in connection with ThyroSeq analyses. Dr Mayson previously received research support from Rosetta Genomics. Dr Nikiforov and Dr Nikiforova have intellectual property rights related to ThyroSeq. They will receive royalties associated with commercial use of ThyroSeq. Dr Sipos received an honorarium for speaking for Veracyte and Genzyme. Dr Sosa is a member of the Data Monitoring Committee of the Medullary Thyroid Cancer Registry supported by GlaxoSmithKline, Novo Nordisk, Astra Zeneca, and Eli Lilly. Dr Steward received research funding from Rosetta, Veracyte, and GeneproDX. No other disclosures were reported.
                Funding/Support: This study was supported in part by the P50CA097190 Head and Neck Cancer SPORE grant to University of Pittsburgh and P50CA168505 Thyroid Cancer SPORE grant to The Ohio State University.
                Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
                Additional Contributions: We thank Sanziana A. Roman MD, Duke University Medical Center; and Randall Scheri MD, Duke University Medical Center, for patient enrollment. Xiaoyin ‘Sara’ Jiang MD, Duke University Medical Center, for pathology review. Michele S. Keller, MHA, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center; Shovana Cajas, BSPHE, Medstar Washington Hospital Center; Brandon G. Clark, MHS, MS, Medstar Washington Hospital Center; Cassandra L. Coyle, MS, ANP-BC, CDE, St. Peter's Health Partners; Kristen A. Lynam BA, RN Duke Cancer Institute; and Elizabeth Wendt, MS, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, for study coordination and assistance. They received no compensation for their contributions other than their salaries. We thank all study participants, staff, and participating centers.
                Article
                coi180087
                10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.4616
                6439562
                30419129
                4fec601d-e804-425b-9ab7-c1e315f5ead4
                Copyright 2018 Steward DL et al. JAMA Oncology.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.

                History
                : 7 May 2018
                : 9 August 2018
                : 10 August 2018
                Categories
                Research
                Research
                Original Investigation
                Online First

                Comments

                Comment on this article