12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Ethical climate and intention to leave among critical care clinicians: an observational study in 68 intensive care units across Europe and the United States

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          Apart from organizational issues, quality of inter-professional collaboration during ethical decision-making may affect the intention to leave one’s job. To determine whether ethical climate is associated with the intention to leave after adjustment for country, ICU and clinicians characteristics.

          Methods

          Perceptions of the ethical climate among clinicians working in 68 adult ICUs in 12 European countries and the US were measured using a self-assessment questionnaire, together with job characteristics and intent to leave as a sub-analysis of the Dispropricus study. The validated ethical decision-making climate questionnaire included seven factors: not avoiding decision-making at end-of-life (EOL), mutual respect within the interdisciplinary team, open interdisciplinary reflection, ethical awareness, self-reflective physician leadership, active decision-making at end-of-life by physicians, and involvement of nurses in EOL. Hierarchical mixed effect models were used to assess associations between these factors, and the intent to leave in clinicians within ICUs, within the different countries.

          Results

          Of 3610 nurses and 1137 physicians providing ICU bedside care, 63.1% and 62.9% participated, respectively. Of 2992 participating clinicians, 782 (26.1%) had intent to leave, of which 27% nurses, 24% junior and 22.7% senior physicians. After adjustment for country, ICU and clinicians characteristics, mutual respect OR 0.77 (95% CI 0.66- 0.90), open interdisciplinary reflection (OR 0.73 [95% CI 0.62–0.86]) and not avoiding EOL decisions (OR 0.87 [95% CI 0.77–0.98]) were all associated with a lower intent to leave.

          Conclusion

          This is the first large multicenter study showing an independent association between clinicians’ intent to leave and the quality of the ethical climate in the ICU. Interventions to reduce intent to leave may be most effective when they focus on improving mutual respect, interdisciplinary reflection and active decision-making at EOL.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (10.1007/s00134-019-05829-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references28

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Teacher Recruitment and Retention: A Review of the Recent Empirical Literature

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Explaining burnout and the intention to leave the profession among health professionals – a cross-sectional study in a hospital setting in Switzerland

            Background Burnout and the intention to leave the profession are frequently studied outcomes in healthcare settings that have not been investigated together and across different health professions before. This study aimed to examine work-related explanatory factors or predictors of burnout and the intention to leave the profession among health professionals in general, and nurses and physicians in particular. Methods Cross-sectional survey data of 1840 employees of six public hospitals and rehabilitation clinics recorded in 2015/16 in German-speaking Switzerland were used. Multiple logistic and stepwise linear regression analyses were performed to estimate the relative risks (odds ratios) and standardized effects (beta coefficients) of different workloads and work-related stressors on these outcomes and to study any possible mediation between them. Results On average, one in twelve health professionals showed increased burnout symptoms and every sixth one thought frequently of leaving the profession. Temporal, physical, emotional and mental workloads and job stresses were strongly and positively associated with burnout symptoms and thoughts of leaving the profession. However, the relative risks of increased burnout symptoms and frequent thoughts of leaving the profession were highest in the case of effort-reward and work-life imbalances. In fact, these two work-related stress measures partly or even largely mediated the relationships between exposures (workloads, job stresses) and outcomes and were found to be the strongest predictors of all. Whereas a work-life imbalance most strongly predicted burnout symptoms among health professionals (β = .35), and particularly physicians (β = .48), an effort-reward imbalance most strongly predicted thoughts of leaving the profession (β = .31–36). A substantial part of the variance was explained in the fully specified regression models across both major health professions and both outcomes. However, explained variance was most pronounced for burnout symptoms of physicians (43.3%) and for frequent thoughts of leaving the profession among nurses and midwives (28.7%). Conclusions Reducing workload and job stress, and particularly reward frustration at work, as well as the difficulties in combining work and private lives among health professionals, may help to prevent them from developing burnout and/or leaving the profession and consequently also to reduce turnover, early retirement, career endings and understaffing in healthcare settings.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Perceptions of appropriateness of care among European and Israeli intensive care unit nurses and physicians.

              Ruth Piers (2011)
              Clinicians in intensive care units (ICUs) who perceive the care they provide as inappropriate experience moral distress and are at risk for burnout. This situation may jeopardize patient quality of care and increase staff turnover. To determine the prevalence of perceived inappropriateness of care among ICU clinicians and to identify patient-related situations, personal characteristics, and work-related characteristics associated with perceived inappropriateness of care. Cross-sectional evaluation on May 11, 2010, of 82 adult ICUs in 9 European countries and Israel. Participants were 1953 ICU nurses and physicians providing bedside care. Perceived inappropriateness of care, defined as a specific patient-care situation in which the clinician acts in a manner contrary to his or her personal and professional beliefs, as assessed using a questionnaire designed for the study. Of 1651 respondents (median response rate, 93% overall; interquartile range, 82%-100% [medians 93% among nurses and 100% among physicians]), perceived inappropriateness of care in at least 1 patient was reported by 439 clinicians overall (27%; 95% CI, 24%-29%), 300 of 1218 were nurses (25%), 132 of 407 were physicians (32%), and 26 had missing answers describing job title. Of these 439 individuals, 397 reported 445 situations associated with perceived inappropriateness of care. The most common reports were perceived disproportionate care (290 situations [65%; 95% CI, 58%-73%], of which "too much care" was reported in 89% of situations, followed by "other patients would benefit more" (168 situations [38%; 95% CI, 32%-43%]). Independently associated with perceived inappropriateness of care rates both among nurses and physicians were symptom control decisions directed by physicians only (odds ratio [OR], 1.73; 95% CI, 1.17-2.56; P = .006); involvement of nurses in end-of-life decision making (OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.60-0.96; P = .02); good collaboration between nurses and physicians (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.56-0.92; P = .009); and freedom to decide how to perform work-related tasks (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.59-0.89; P = .002); while a high perceived workload was significantly associated among nurses only (OR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.07-2.06; P = .02). Perceived inappropriateness of care was independently associated with higher intent to leave a job (OR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.04-2.63; P = .03). In the subset of 69 ICUs for which patient data could be linked, clinicians reported received inappropriateness of care in 207 patients, representing 23% (95% CI, 20%-27%) of 883 ICU beds. Among a group of European and Israeli ICU clinicians, perceptions of inappropriate care were frequently reported and were inversely associated with factors indicating good teamwork.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                bo.vandenbulcke@uzgent.be
                Journal
                Intensive Care Med
                Intensive Care Med
                Intensive Care Medicine
                Springer Berlin Heidelberg (Berlin/Heidelberg )
                0342-4642
                1432-1238
                5 November 2019
                5 November 2019
                2020
                : 46
                : 1
                : 46-56
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.410566.0, ISNI 0000 0004 0626 3303, Department of Intensive Care Medicine, , Ghent University Hospital, ; De Pintelaan 185, Ghent, Belgium
                [2 ]GRID grid.46699.34, ISNI 0000 0004 0391 9020, King’s College Hospital, ; London, UK
                [3 ]GRID grid.4830.f, ISNI 0000 0004 0407 1981, Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, , University of Groningen, ; Groningen, The Netherlands
                [4 ]GRID grid.411798.2, ISNI 0000 0000 9100 9940, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, First Faculty of Medicine, , Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, ; Prague, Czech Republic
                [5 ]GRID grid.417271.6, ISNI 0000 0004 0512 5814, Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Institute of Regional Research, , Vejle Hospital, ; Vejle, Denmark
                [6 ]GRID grid.1649.a, ISNI 000000009445082X, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, , Sahlgrenska University Hospital, ; Gothenburg, Sweden
                [7 ]GRID grid.10825.3e, ISNI 0000 0001 0728 0170, University of Southern Denmark, ; Odense, Denmark
                [8 ]GRID grid.413328.f, ISNI 0000 0001 2300 6614, Hôpital Saint-Louis and University Paris-7, ; Paris, France
                [9 ]GRID grid.239395.7, ISNI 0000 0000 9011 8547, Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, , Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, ; Boston, MA USA
                [10 ]Service des Medicine Interne, Soins Intensifs et Urgences Oncologiques, Institut Jules Bordet, ULB, Brussels, Belgium
                [11 ]GRID grid.412824.9, ISNI 0000 0004 1756 8161, SCDU Anestesia e Rianimazione, Azienda and Ospedaliero Universitaria, , Maggiore della Carità, ; Novara, Italy
                [12 ]GRID grid.11804.3c, ISNI 0000 0001 0942 9821, Semmelweis University Budapest, ; Budapest, Hungary
                [13 ]Intensive Care Department, Hospital S.António, Porto, Portugal
                [14 ]Tettnang Hospital, Tettnang, Germany
                [15 ]GRID grid.5645.2, ISNI 000000040459992X, Department of Intensive Care Medicine, , Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, ; Rotterdam, The Netherlands
                [16 ]GRID grid.5342.0, ISNI 0000 0001 2069 7798, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Department of Personnel Management, Work and Organizational Psychology, , Ghent University, ; Ghent, Belgium
                [17 ]GRID grid.5342.0, ISNI 0000 0001 2069 7798, Department of Applied Mathematics, Computer Science and Statistics, Faculty of Sciences, , Ghent University, ; Ghent, Belgium
                [18 ]GRID grid.8991.9, ISNI 0000 0004 0425 469X, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, ; London, UK
                [19 ]GRID grid.5342.0, ISNI 0000 0001 2069 7798, Department of Psycho-analysis and Clinical Consulting, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, , Ghent University, ; Ghent, Belgium
                [20 ]GRID grid.410566.0, ISNI 0000 0004 0626 3303, Department of Geriatric Medicine, , Ghent University Hospital, ; Ghent, Belgium
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5379-8886
                Article
                5829
                10.1007/s00134-019-05829-1
                6954133
                31690968
                4fd82c6f-67c3-4596-9379-4047cdaa1286
                © The Author(s) 2019

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

                History
                : 28 June 2019
                : 10 October 2019
                Funding
                Funded by: ESCIM/ECCRN clinical research award
                Funded by: FWO senior clinical investigators grant
                Award ID: 1800513N
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Original
                Custom metadata
                © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020

                Emergency medicine & Trauma
                intent to leave,ethical climate,interdisciplinary reflection,decision-making,respect

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content130

                Cited by40

                Most referenced authors852