1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      The Roots of Right-Wing Populism: Donald Trump in 2016

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references48

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          null

          null (2016)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Book: not found

            Network Propaganda

            This book examines the shape, composition, and practices of the United States political media landscape. It explores the roots of the current epistemic crisis in political communication with a focus on the remarkable 2016 U.S. president election culminating in the victory of Donald Trump and the first year of his presidency. The authors present a detailed map of the American political media landscape based on the analysis of millions of stories and social media posts, revealing a highly polarized and asymmetric media ecosystem. Detailed case studies track the emergence and propagation of disinformation in the American public sphere that took advantage of structural weaknesses in the media institutions across the political spectrum. This book describes how the conservative faction led by Steve Bannon and funded by Robert Mercer was able to inject opposition research into the mainstream media agenda that left an unsubstantiated but indelible stain of corruption on the Clinton campaign. The authors also document how Fox News deflects negative coverage of President Trump and has promoted a series of exaggerated and fabricated counter narratives to defend the president against the damaging news coming out of the Mueller investigation. Based on an analysis of the actors that sought to influence political public discourse, this book argues that the current problems of media and democracy are not the result of Russian interference, behavioral microtargeting and algorithms on social media, political clickbait, hackers, sockpuppets, or trolls, but of asymmetric media structures decades in the making. The crisis is political, not technological.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Status threat, not economic hardship, explains the 2016 presidential vote

              Diana Mutz (2018)
              Significance Support for Donald J. Trump in the 2016 election was widely attributed to citizens who were “left behind” economically. These claims were based on the strong cross-sectional relationship between Trump support and lacking a college education. Using a representative panel from 2012 to 2016, I find that change in financial wellbeing had little impact on candidate preference. Instead, changing preferences were related to changes in the party’s positions on issues related to American global dominance and the rise of a majority–minority America: issues that threaten white Americans’ sense of dominant group status. Results highlight the importance of looking beyond theories emphasizing changes in issue salience to better understand the meaning of election outcomes when public preferences and candidates’ positions are changing.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                International Journal of Political Economy
                International Journal of Political Economy
                Informa UK Limited
                0891-1916
                1558-0970
                April 02 2020
                July 30 2020
                April 02 2020
                : 49
                : 2
                : 102-123
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Research Director, Institute for New Economic Thinking, New York, NY, USA; University of Massachusetts, Boston, MA, USA;
                [2 ] Department of Political Science, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA;
                [3 ] Department of Political Science, Williams College, Williamstown, MA, USA;
                [4 ] University Statistician, University of Massachusetts, Boston, MA, USA
                Article
                10.1080/08911916.2020.1778861
                4f5c5bec-bca6-4bc0-909a-2b1c2050eb5a
                © 2020
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article