2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Clinical effectiveness and analytical quality of a national point-of-care testing network for sexually transmitted infections integrated into rural and remote primary care clinics in Australia, 2016–2022: an observational program evaluation

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          Background

          To address inequitable diagnostic access and improve time-to-treatment for First Nations peoples, molecular point-of-care (POC) testing for chlamydia, gonorrhoea and trichomonas was integrated into 49 primary care clinics across Australia. We conducted an observational evaluation to determine clinical effectiveness and analytical quality of POC testing delivered through this national program.

          Methods

          We evaluated (i) implementation by measuring trends in mean monthly POC testing; ii) clinical effectiveness by comparing proportions of positive patients treated by historical control/intervention period and by test type, and calculated infectious days averted; (iii) analytical quality by calculating result concordance by test type, and proportion of unsuccessful POC tests.

          Findings

          Between 2016 and 2022, 46,153 POC tests were performed; an increasing mean monthly testing trend was observed in the first four years (p < 0.0001). A greater proportion of chlamydia/gonorrhoea positives were treated in intervention compared with historical control periods (≤2 days: 37% vs 22% [RR 1.68; 95% CI 1.12, 2.53]; ≤7 days: 48% vs 30% [RR 1.6; 95% CI 1.10, 2.33]; ≤120 days: 79% vs 54% [RR 1.46; 95% CI 1.10, 1.95]); similarly for trichomonas positives and by test type. POC testing for chlamydia, gonorrhoea and trichomonas averted 4930, 5620 and 7075 infectious days, respectively. Results concordance was high [99.0% (chlamydia), 99.3% (gonorrhoea) and 98.9% (trichomonas)]; unsuccessful POC test proportion was 1.8% for chlamydia/gonorrhoea and 2.1% for trichomonas.

          Interpretation

          Molecular POC testing was successfully integrated into primary care settings as part of a routinely implemented program achieving significant clinical benefits with high analytical quality. In addition to the individual health benefits of earlier treatment, fewer infective days could contribute to reduced transmissions in First Nations communities.

          Funding

          This work was supported by an Australian National Health and Medical Research Council Partnership Grant (APP1092503), the doi 10.13039/501100003921, Australian Government Department of Health; , Western Australia and Queensland Departments of Health.

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on utilisation of healthcare services: a systematic review

            Objectives To determine the extent and nature of changes in utilisation of healthcare services during COVID-19 pandemic. Design Systematic review. Eligibility Eligible studies compared utilisation of services during COVID-19 pandemic to at least one comparable period in prior years. Services included visits, admissions, diagnostics and therapeutics. Studies were excluded if from single centres or studied only patients with COVID-19. Data sources PubMed, Embase, Cochrane COVID-19 Study Register and preprints were searched, without language restrictions, until 10 August, using detailed searches with key concepts including COVID-19, health services and impact. Data analysis Risk of bias was assessed by adapting the Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies of Interventions tool, and a Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care tool. Results were analysed using descriptive statistics, graphical figures and narrative synthesis. Outcome measures Primary outcome was change in service utilisation between prepandemic and pandemic periods. Secondary outcome was the change in proportions of users of healthcare services with milder or more severe illness (eg, triage scores). Results 3097 unique references were identified, and 81 studies across 20 countries included, reporting on >11 million services prepandemic and 6.9 million during pandemic. For the primary outcome, there were 143 estimates of changes, with a median 37% reduction in services overall (IQR −51% to −20%), comprising median reductions for visits of 42% (−53% to −32%), admissions 28% (−40% to −17%), diagnostics 31% (−53% to −24%) and for therapeutics 30% (−57% to −19%). Among 35 studies reporting secondary outcomes, there were 60 estimates, with 27 (45%) reporting larger reductions in utilisation among people with a milder spectrum of illness, and 33 (55%) reporting no difference. Conclusions Healthcare utilisation decreased by about a third during the pandemic, with considerable variation, and with greater reductions among people with less severe illness. While addressing unmet need remains a priority, studies of health impacts of reductions may help health systems reduce unnecessary care in the postpandemic recovery. PROSPERO registration number CRD42020203729.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The Lancet Commission on diagnostics: transforming access to diagnostics

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Lancet Reg Health West Pac
                Lancet Reg Health West Pac
                The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific
                Elsevier
                2666-6065
                10 June 2024
                July 2024
                10 June 2024
                : 48
                : 101110
                Affiliations
                [a ]Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
                [b ]Poche Centre for Indigenous Health, The University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia
                [c ]Flinders University International Centre for Point of Care Testing, South Australia, Australia
                [d ]Cepheid, California, USA
                [e ]WA Health, Western Australia, Australia
                [f ]NT Health, Northern Territory, Australia
                [g ]Aboriginal Medical Services Alliance of Northern Territory, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia
                [h ]PathWest, Western Australia, Australia
                [i ]Burnet Institute, Victoria, Australia
                [j ]Centre for Clinical Research, University of Queensland, Australia
                [k ]Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
                Author notes
                Article
                S2666-6065(24)00104-4 101110
                10.1016/j.lanwpc.2024.101110
                11215331
                38952441
                4f52f73c-4e44-48f8-b1c5-df4e8851d6a8
                © 2024 The Author(s)

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

                History
                : 15 January 2024
                : 12 April 2024
                : 23 May 2024
                Categories
                Articles

                chlamydia,gonorrhoea,trichomoniasis,sexually transmitted infections,poc testing,implementation,scaling up,clinical effectiveness

                Comments

                Comment on this article