16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      TRLS-07. BRAINSTORM: OUTCOMES FROM A MULTI-INSTITUTIONAL PHASE I/II STUDY OF RRx-001 IN COMBINATION WITH WHOLE BRAIN RADIATION THERAPY FOR PATIENTS WITH BRAIN METASTASES

      abstract

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          INTRODUCTION: To determine the recommended Phase II dose of RRx-001, a radiosensitizer with vascular normalizing properties, when used with whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) for brain metastases, and to assess whether quantitative changes in perfusion MRI after RRx-001 correlate with response. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Five centers participated in this phase I/II trial of RRx-001 given once pre-WBRT then twice weekly during WBRT (30 Gy/10 fractions). Four dose levels were planned (5 mg/m2, 8.4 mg/m2, 16.5 mg/m2, 27.5 mg/m2). Dose-escalation was managed by the Time-to-Event Continual Reassessment Model (TITE-CRM). Correlative DCE-MRI was performed in a subset of patients and linear mixed models used to correlate change in 24-hour T1, Ktrans (capillary permeability) and Vp (plasma volume) with change in tumor volume. RESULTS: Between 2015–2017, 31 patients were enrolled. Two patients dropped out prior to any therapy and 7 were treated with concurrent temozolomide following a study amendment. Median age was 60 years (range, 30–76) and 17 were male. The most common tumor types were melanoma (58%) and non-small cell lung cancer (20%). No dose-limiting toxicities were observed. The most common severe adverse event was grade 3 asthenia in 6.9% (2/29). The median intracranial response rate was 46% (95%CI 24–68) and median overall survival was 5.2 months (95%CI 4.5–9.4). No neurologic deaths occurred. Among 10 evaluable patients undergoing DCE-MRI, a reduction in Vp 24 hours after RRx-001 was associated with reduced tumor volume at 1 month and 4 months (p≤0.01). CONCLUSION: The addition of RRx-001 to WBRT is safe and well-tolerated with favorable intracranial response rates. Because activity was observed across all dose levels, and in the absence of a dose response, the recommended Phase 2 dose is 10 mg administered twice weekly. A reduction in Vp by DCE-MRI 24 hours after RRx-001 suggests anti-angiogenic activity that is associated with longer-term tumor response.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Neurooncol Adv
          Neurooncol Adv
          noa
          Neuro-oncology Advances
          Oxford University Press (US )
          2632-2498
          August 2019
          12 August 2019
          12 August 2019
          : 1
          : Suppl 1 , Abstracts from the Society for Neuro-Oncology Inaugural Conference on Brain Metastases August 16 – 17, 2019
          : i9-i10
          Article
          vdz014.040
          10.1093/noajnl/vdz014.040
          7213090
          4f0bc1ba-7cef-4d73-a3fb-0cd10162def5
          © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press, the Society for Neuro-Oncology and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology.

          This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com

          History
          Page count
          Pages: 1
          Categories
          Abstracts
          Clinical Trials

          Comments

          Comment on this article

          scite_
          0
          0
          0
          0
          Smart Citations
          0
          0
          0
          0
          Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
          View Citations

          See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

          scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

          Similar content181