0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Rectal Adenocarcinoma Presenting as a Cervical Mass: A Case Report

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Patient: Female, 68-year-old

          Final Diagnosis: Mucinous rectal adenocarcinoma

          Symptoms: Vaginal bleeding

          Clinical Procedure: Abdominoperineal resection • bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy • en-bloc hysterectomy • posterior vaginectomy

          Specialty: Gastroenterology and Hepatology • Obstetrics and Gynecology • Oncology • Pathology • Radiology • Surgery

          Objective:

          Challenging differential diagnosis

          Background:

          Invasive cervical tumors are often seen in clinical practice. However, there are multiple structures within the pelvis, and invasion of the cervix from another site must be included in the differential diagnosis. In such cases, a multidisciplinary approach is needed to define the organ of tumor origin. Ensuring proper staging and histologic analysis are critical for optimal management.

          Case Report:

          We present a case of a 68-year-old woman who presented to her gynecologist with painless post-menopausal vaginal bleeding. She was diagnosed with a locally aggressive cervical adenocarcinoma, which was histologically confirmed by an in-office biopsy. She was referred to the gynecologic oncology service at a tertiary care hospital for definitive management, where a thorough clinical workup was performed. Physical exam revealed that the mass had invaded the anterior rectal wall. Through a multidisciplinary approach and a repeat biopsy, she was correctly diagnosed with an invasive rectal adenocarcinoma. She was treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and underwent curative surgery. Had she been incorrectly treated as having a primary cervical adenocarcinoma, there would have been no role for surgery. The change in the organ of primary drastically altered the patient’s management and outcome. She is currently undergoing surveillance with cross-sectional imaging.

          Conclusions:

          Cervical masses originating from non-gynecologic organs can be difficult to differentiate on physical exam and histologic analysis. When a mass involves the rectum, an invasive primary rectal adenocarcinoma must be included in the differential. This will have a significant impact on patient management and ultimately on patient survival.

          Related collections

          Most cited references13

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Metastatic pattern in colorectal cancer is strongly influenced by histological subtype.

          Clinical studies regarding colorectal cancer (CRC) have suggested differences in metastatic patterns between mucinous adenocarcinoma (MC), signet-ring cell carcinoma (SRCC) and the more common adenocarcinoma (AC). The current study systematically evaluates metastatic patterns of different histological subtypes in CRC patients and analyzes metastatic disease upon primary tumor localization.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            MRI-guided adaptive brachytherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer (EMBRACE-I): a multicentre prospective cohort study

            The concept of the use of MRI for image-guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT) in locally advanced cervical cancer was introduced 20 years ago. Here, we report on EMBRACE-I, which aimed to evaluate local tumour control and morbidity after chemoradiotherapy and MRI-based IGABT.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Adenocarcinoma: a unique cervical cancer.

              Adenocarcinoma of the cervix constitutes only approximately 20% of all cervical carcinomas; therefore, specific Level 1 evidence to guide patient management is lacking. Most trials have included this histologic subtype but in insufficient numbers to do more than generate hypotheses from subset analyses. As a consequence, our understanding of the natural history and optimal management of adenocarcinoma of the cervix is limited. The optimal management of adenocarcinoma of the cervix continues to be a subject of debate among practitioners as to whether or not it should be different from squamous cell carcinoma and what would constitute this management. The purpose of this review was to give an overview of the current knowledge on adenocarcinoma of the cervix and its differences from squamous cell carcinoma with regard to risk factors, prognosis, survival rates, patterns of recurrence, and response to treatment. This article will focus on possible specific therapeutic directions to explore in the management of locally advanced adenocarcinomas.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Am J Case Rep
                Am J Case Rep
                amjcaserep
                The American Journal of Case Reports
                International Scientific Literature, Inc.
                1941-5923
                2023
                27 November 2023
                : 24
                : e941884-1-e941884-6
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Abdominal Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
                [2 ]Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
                [3 ]Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
                [4 ]Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
                Author notes
                Corresponding Author: Nir Stanietzky, e-mail: nstanietzky@ 123456mdanderson.org

                Authors’ Contribution:

                [A]

                Study Design

                [B]

                Data Collection

                [C]

                Statistical Analysis

                [D]

                Data Interpretation

                [E]

                Manuscript Preparation

                [F]

                Literature Search

                [G]

                Funds Collection

                Financial support: None declared

                Conflict of interest: None declared

                Article
                941884
                10.12659/AJCR.941884
                10697495
                38011075
                4ef6ca32-2595-45b1-ab80-b51351010096
                © Am J Case Rep, 2023

                This work is licensed under Creative Common Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International ( CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)

                History
                : 21 July 2023
                : 19 October 2023
                : 24 October 2023
                Categories
                Articles

                colorectal neoplasms,diagnostic errors,uterine cervical neoplasms

                Comments

                Comment on this article