0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Experiences of integrating social prescribing link workers into primary care in England — bolting on, fitting in, or belonging: a realist evaluation

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Following the 2019 NHS Long Term Plan, link workers have been employed across primary care in England to deliver social prescribing.

          Aim

          To understand and explain how the link worker role is being implemented in primary care in England.

          Design and setting

          This was a realist evaluation undertaken in England, focusing on link workers based in primary care.

          Method

          The study used focused ethnographies around seven link workers from different parts of England. As part of this, we interviewed 61 patients and 93 professionals from health care and the voluntary, community, and social enterprise sector. We reinterviewed 41 patients, seven link workers, and a link worker manager 9–12 months after their first interview.

          Results

          We developed four concepts from the codes developed during the project on the topic around how link workers are integrated (or not) within primary care: (or not) within primary care: centralising or diffusing power; forging an identity in general practice; demonstrating effect; and building a facilitative infrastructure. These concepts informed the development of a programme theory around a continuum of integration of link workers into primary care — from being ‘bolted on’ to existing provision, without much consideration, to ‘fitting in’, shaping what is delivered to be accommodating, through to ‘belonging’, whereby they are accepted as a legitimate source of support, making a valued contribution to patients’ broader wellbeing.

          Conclusion

          Social prescribing was introduced into primary care to promote greater attention to the full range of factors affecting patients’ health and wellbeing, beyond biomedicine. For that to happen, our analysis highlights the need for a whole-system approach to defining, delivering, and maintaining this new part of practice.

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book: not found

          The Science of Evaluation: A Realist Manifesto

          Ray Pawson (2013)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Global developments in social prescribing

            Social prescribing is an approach that aims to improve health and well-being. It connects individuals to non-clinical services and supports that address social needs, such as those related to loneliness, housing instability and mental health. At the person level, social prescribing can give individuals the knowledge, skills, motivation and confidence to manage their own health and well-being. At the society level, it can facilitate greater collaboration across health, social, and community sectors to promote integrated care and move beyond the traditional biomedical model of health. While the term social prescribing was first popularised in the UK, this practice has become more prevalent and widely publicised internationally over the last decade. This paper aims to illuminate the ways social prescribing has been conceptualised and implemented across 17 countries in Europe, Asia, Australia and North America. We draw from the ‘Beyond the Building Blocks’ framework to describe the essential inputs for adopting social prescribing into policy and practice, related to service delivery; social determinants and household production of health; workforce; leadership and governance; financing, community organisations and societal partnerships; health technology; and information, learning and accountability. Cross-cutting lessons can inform country and regional efforts to tailor social prescribing models to best support local needs.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Supporting social prescribing in primary care by linking people to local assets: a realist review

              Background Social prescribing is a way of addressing the ‘non-medical’ needs (e.g. loneliness, debt, housing problems) that can affect people’s health and well-being. Connector schemes (e.g. delivered by care navigators or link workers) have become a key component to social prescribing’s delivery. Those in this role support patients by either (a) signposting them to relevant local assets (e.g. groups, organisations, charities, activities, events) or (b) taking time to assist them in identifying and prioritising their ‘non-medical’ needs and connecting them to relevant local assets. To understand how such connector schemes work, for whom, why and in what circumstances, we conducted a realist review. Method A search of electronic databases was supplemented with Google alerts and reference checking to locate grey literature. In addition, we sent a Freedom of Information request to all Clinical Commissioning Groups in England to identify any further evaluations of social prescribing connector schemes. Included studies were from the UK and focused on connector schemes for adult patients (18+ years) related to primary care. Results Our searches resulted in 118 included documents, from which data were extracted to produce context-mechanism-outcome configurations (CMOCs). These CMOCs underpinned our emerging programme theory that centred on the essential role of ‘buy-in’ and connections. This was refined further by turning to existing theories on (a) social capital and (b) patient activation. Conclusion Our realist review highlights how connector roles, especially link workers, represent a vehicle for accruing social capital (e.g. trust, sense of belonging, practical support). We propose that this then gives patients the confidence, motivation, connections, knowledge and skills to manage their own well-being, thereby reducing their reliance on GPs. We also emphasise within the programme theory situations that could result in unintended consequences (e.g. increased demand on GPs).
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Associate professor
                Role: Research fellow
                Role: Associate professor
                Role: National Institute for Health and Care Research doctoral research fellow
                Role: Research fellow
                Role: Health services researcher
                Role: Professor of primary care research
                Role: Professor of general practice research
                Role: Associate professor
                Role: Associate professor
                Role: Professor of medical sociology
                Role: Senior fellow in health policy
                Role: Professor of evidence based healthcare
                Journal
                Br J Gen Pract
                Br J Gen Pract
                bjgp
                bjgp
                The British Journal of General Practice
                Royal College of General Practitioners
                0960-1643
                1478-5242
                March 2025
                28 January 2025
                28 January 2025
                : 75
                : 752
                : e195-e202
                Affiliations
                Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford.
                Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford.
                Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford.
                Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford.
                Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford.
                Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford.
                Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull.
                School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield.
                Peninsula Medical School, University of Plymouth, Plymouth.
                Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol.
                Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford.
                The King’s Fund, London.
                Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford.
                Author notes
                CORRESPONDENCE Stephanie Tierney Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Primary Care Building, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK. Email: stephanie.tierney@ 123456phc.ox.ac.uk
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2155-2440
                Article
                10.3399/BJGP.2024.0279
                11800410
                39317389
                4ef09724-bdd2-462f-a8ac-3073528cb387
                © The Authors

                This article is Open Access: CC BY 4.0 licence ( http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 11 May 2024
                : 15 July 2024
                : 07 August 2024
                Funding
                Funded by: the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR)
                Award ID: NIHR130247
                This research was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) (reference: NIHR130247). This research was also supported by the NIHR Applied Research Collaboration South West Peninsula. Views and opinions expressed are those of the authors or participants in the study; they are not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR, the Department of Health and Social Care, or the authors’ institutions.
                Categories
                Research

                link workers,primary health care,realist evaluation,social prescribing,delivery of health care

                Comments

                Comment on this article