Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Pertuzumab plus trastuzumab (P+T) in patients (Pts) with colorectal cancer (CRC) with ERBB2 amplification or overexpression: Results from the TAPUR Study.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          132

          Background: TAPUR is a phase II basket trial evaluating anti-tumor activity of commercially available targeted agents in pts with advanced cancers with genomic alterations. Results in a cohort of CRC pts with ERBB2 overexpression or amplification treated with P+T are reported. Methods: Eligible pts had advanced CRC, no standard treatment (tx) options, measurable disease, ECOG PS 0-2, and adequate organ function. Genomic testing was performed in CLIA-certified, CAP-accredited site selected labs. Pts had ERBB2 overexpression or amplification, or certain ERBB2 mutations. Recommended dosing after initial dosing was P, 420 mg IV over 30-60 mins every 3 weeks (wks) and T, 6 mg/kg over 30-60 mins every 3 wks. Simon two-stage design was used to test a null rate of 15% vs. 35% (power = 0.85; α = 0.10). If ≥2 of 10 pts in stage 1 have disease control (DC) (objective response (OR) or stable disease at 16+ wks per RECIST (SD16+)), 18 more pts enrolled. If ≥7 of 28 pts have DC, the tx is worthy of further study. Secondary endpoints are progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety. Results: Twenty-eight pts enrolled from November 2016 to September 2018 were evaluable for efficacy and safety. Demographics and outcomes are summarized in Table. All pts had ERBB2 amplification; 1 also had an ERBB2 mutation. 79% of pts had at least 3 prior txs. Four PR and 10 SD16+ were observed for DC and OR rates of 50% (90% CI, 36% to 60%) and 14% (95% CI, 4% to 33%), respectively. Two pts had at least one grade 3 AE or SAE at least possibly related to P+T including anemia, infusion reaction, and left ventricular dysfunction. Conclusions: The combination of P+T showed anti-tumor activity in heavily pre-treated CRC pts with ERBB2 amplification . Additional analyses by RAS mutation status are pending. Further study is warranted to confirm efficacy of P+T in this population. Clinical trial information: NCT02693535.

          [Table: see text]

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Journal of Clinical Oncology
          JCO
          American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
          0732-183X
          1527-7755
          February 01 2020
          February 01 2020
          : 38
          : 4_suppl
          : 132
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Lehigh Valley Health Network, Bethlehem, PA;
          [2 ]Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC;
          [3 ]Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC;
          [4 ]American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA;
          [5 ]Sutter Medical Group, Sacramento, CA;
          [6 ]Cancer Treatment Centers of America, Atlanta, GA;
          [7 ]Southwestern Reg Medcl Ctr, Tulsa, OK;
          [8 ]ASCO, Arlington, VA;
          Article
          10.1200/JCO.2020.38.4_suppl.132
          4eebef5a-4a5b-4d8d-887f-b20ead7c2e7b
          © 2020
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article

          scite_
          0
          0
          0
          0
          Smart Citations
          0
          0
          0
          0
          Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
          View Citations

          See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

          scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

          Similar content292

          Cited by15