55
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Total 18F-dopa PET tumour uptake reflects metabolic endocrine tumour activity in patients with a carcinoid tumour

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          Positron emission tomography (PET) using 6-[ 18F]fluoro- L-dihydroxyphenylalanine ( 18F-dopa) has an excellent sensitivity to detect carcinoid tumour lesions. 18F-dopa tumour uptake and the levels of biochemical tumour markers are mediated by tumour endocrine metabolic activity. We evaluated whether total 18F-dopa tumour uptake on PET, defined as whole-body metabolic tumour burden (WBMTB), reflects tumour load per patient, as measured with tumour markers.

          Methods

          Seventy-seven consecutive carcinoid patients who underwent an 18F-dopa PET scan in two previously published studies were analysed. For all tumour lesions mean standardised uptake values (SUVs) at 40% of the maximal SUV and tumour volume on 18F-dopa PET were determined and multiplied to calculate a metabolic burden per lesion. WBMTB was the sum of the metabolic burden of all individual lesions per patient. The 24-h urinary serotonin, urine and plasma 5-hydroxindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA), catecholamines (nor)epinephrine, dopamine and their metabolites, measured in urine and plasma, and serum chromogranin A served as tumour markers.

          Results

          All but 1 were evaluable for WBMTB; 74 patients had metastatic disease. 18F-dopa PET detected 979 lesions. SUV max on 18F-dopa PET varied up to 29-fold between individual lesions within the same patients. WBMTB correlated with urinary serotonin ( r = 0.51) and urinary and plasma 5-HIAA ( r = 0.78 and 0.66). WBMTB also correlated with urinary norepinephrine, epinephrine, dopamine and plasma dopamine, but not with serum chromogranin A.

          Conclusion

          Tumour load per patient measured with 18F-dopa PET correlates with tumour markers of the serotonin and catecholamine pathway in urine and plasma in carcinoid patients, reflecting metabolic tumour activity.

          Related collections

          Most cited references36

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          From RECIST to PERCIST: Evolving Considerations for PET response criteria in solid tumors.

          The purpose of this article is to review the status and limitations of anatomic tumor response metrics including the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria, the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), and RECIST 1.1. This article also reviews qualitative and quantitative approaches to metabolic tumor response assessment with (18)F-FDG PET and proposes a draft framework for PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (PERCIST), version 1.0. PubMed searches, including searches for the terms RECIST, positron, WHO, FDG, cancer (including specific types), treatment response, region of interest, and derivative references, were performed. Abstracts and articles judged most relevant to the goals of this report were reviewed with emphasis on limitations and strengths of the anatomic and PET approaches to treatment response assessment. On the basis of these data and the authors' experience, draft criteria were formulated for PET tumor response to treatment. Approximately 3,000 potentially relevant references were screened. Anatomic imaging alone using standard WHO, RECIST, and RECIST 1.1 criteria is widely applied but still has limitations in response assessments. For example, despite effective treatment, changes in tumor size can be minimal in tumors such as lymphomas, sarcoma, hepatomas, mesothelioma, and gastrointestinal stromal tumor. CT tumor density, contrast enhancement, or MRI characteristics appear more informative than size but are not yet routinely applied. RECIST criteria may show progression of tumor more slowly than WHO criteria. RECIST 1.1 criteria (assessing a maximum of 5 tumor foci, vs. 10 in RECIST) result in a higher complete response rate than the original RECIST criteria, at least in lymph nodes. Variability appears greater in assessing progression than in assessing response. Qualitative and quantitative approaches to (18)F-FDG PET response assessment have been applied and require a consistent PET methodology to allow quantitative assessments. Statistically significant changes in tumor standardized uptake value (SUV) occur in careful test-retest studies of high-SUV tumors, with a change of 20% in SUV of a region 1 cm or larger in diameter; however, medically relevant beneficial changes are often associated with a 30% or greater decline. The more extensive the therapy, the greater the decline in SUV with most effective treatments. Important components of the proposed PERCIST criteria include assessing normal reference tissue values in a 3-cm-diameter region of interest in the liver, using a consistent PET protocol, using a fixed small region of interest about 1 cm(3) in volume (1.2-cm diameter) in the most active region of metabolically active tumors to minimize statistical variability, assessing tumor size, treating SUV lean measurements in the 1 (up to 5 optional) most metabolically active tumor focus as a continuous variable, requiring a 30% decline in SUV for "response," and deferring to RECIST 1.1 in cases that do not have (18)F-FDG avidity or are technically unsuitable. Criteria to define progression of tumor-absent new lesions are uncertain but are proposed. Anatomic imaging alone using standard WHO, RECIST, and RECIST 1.1 criteria have limitations, particularly in assessing the activity of newer cancer therapies that stabilize disease, whereas (18)F-FDG PET appears particularly valuable in such cases. The proposed PERCIST 1.0 criteria should serve as a starting point for use in clinical trials and in structured quantitative clinical reporting. Undoubtedly, subsequent revisions and enhancements will be required as validation studies are undertaken in varying diseases and treatments.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Primary tumor standardized uptake value (SUVmax) measured on fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) is of prognostic value for survival in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a systematic review and meta-analysis (MA) by the European Lung Cancer Working Party for the IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project.

            The 2-[18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography is an imaging tool for assessing clinical tumor, node, metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Primary tumor standardized uptake value (SUV) has been studied as a potential prognostic factor for survival. However, the sample sizes are limited leading to conduct a meta-analysis to improve the precision in estimating its effect. We performed a systematic literature search. For each publication, we extracted an estimate of the hazard ratio (HR) for comparing patients with a low and a high SUV and we aggregated the individual HRs into a combined HR, using a random-effects model. We found 13 eligible studies dedicated to NSCLC. Most of them included patients with stages I to III/IV and used a SUV assessment corrected for body weight. Number of patients ranged from 38 to 315 (total: 1474); 11 studies identified a high SUV as a poor prognostic factor for survival although two studies found no significant correlation between SUV and survival. SUV measurement and SUV threshold for defining high SUV were study dependent, eight studies looked for a so-called best cutoff (maximizing the logrank test statistic) without adjusting the p value for multiplicity. Overall, the combined HR for the 13 reports was 2.27 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.70-3.02); excluding the studies proposing a "best" cutoff, it was 2.08 (95% CI: 1.431-3.04). Our meta-analysis suggests that the primary tumor SUV measurement has a prognostic value in NSCLC; these results should be confirmed in a meta-analysis on individual patients' data.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Carcinoid tumors: analysis of prognostic factors and survival in 301 patients from a referral center.

              Little is known about factors related to prognosis in patients with carcinoid disease. In this study we have tried to identify such factors. We have evaluated 301 consecutive carcinoid patients (256 midgut, 39 foregut and six hindgut) referred during 15 years for medical treatment with respect to tumor distribution, hormone production, prognostic factors and survival. Survival was significantly shorter in midgut carcinoid patients with > or = 5 liver metastases or with high levels of urinary 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid, plasma chromogranin A or neuropeptide K. By univariate analysis, these variables together with the presence of carcinoid syndrome were related to a higher risk of dying. In multivariate analyses, performed in the 71 patients with full information on all variables, advanced age and plasma chromogranin A > 5000 micrograms/l were independent predictors of overall survival. Poor prognostic factors for midgut carcinoid patients were multiple liver metastases, presence of carcinoid syndrome and high levels of the tumor markers studied. In this study the only independent predictors of bad prognosis in midgut, carcinoid patients were advanced age, which however is inherently related to overall survival, and plasma chromogranin A > 5000 micrograms/l. Thus, chromogranin A may prove to be an important prognostic marker for patients with carcinoid tumors.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +31-50-3612934 , +31-50-3614862 , e.g.e.de.vries@int.umcg.nl
                Journal
                Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging
                European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
                Springer-Verlag (Berlin/Heidelberg )
                1619-7070
                1619-7089
                23 June 2011
                23 June 2011
                October 2011
                : 38
                : 10
                : 1854-1861
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Centre Groningen, P.O. Box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands
                [2 ]Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Medical Centre Groningen, P.O. Box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands
                [3 ]Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Centre Groningen, P.O. Box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands
                [4 ]Department of Endocrinology, University Medical Centre Groningen, P.O. Box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands
                Article
                1862
                10.1007/s00259-011-1862-5
                3168742
                21698413
                4e76f9d3-808f-47cb-a1b2-afa2aec43261
                © The Author(s) 2011
                History
                : 14 February 2011
                : 7 June 2011
                Categories
                Original Article
                Custom metadata
                © Springer-Verlag 2011

                Radiology & Imaging
                18f-dopa pet,whole-body metabolic tumour burden,carcinoid tumour,5-hiaa
                Radiology & Imaging
                18f-dopa pet, whole-body metabolic tumour burden, carcinoid tumour, 5-hiaa

                Comments

                Comment on this article