5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Unsupervised clustering analysis of data from an online community to identify lupus patient profiles with regards to treatment preferences

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          Lupus is a chronic complex autoimmune disease. Non-adherence to treatment can affect patient outcomes. Considering patients’ preferences into medical decisions may increase acceptance to their medication. The PREFERLUP study used unsupervised clustering analysis to identify profiles of patients with similar treatment preferences in an online community of French lupus patients.

          Methods

          An online survey was conducted in adult lupus patients from the Carenity community between August 2018 and April 2019. Multiple Correspondence Analysis (MCA) was used with three unsupervised clustering methods (hierarchical, kmeans and partitioning around medoids). Several indicators (measure of connectivity, Dunn index and Silhouette width) were used to select the best clustering algorithm and choose the number of clusters.

          Results

          The 268 participants were mostly female (96%), with a mean age of 44.3 years 83% fulfilled the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) self-reported diagnostic criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus. Overall, the preferred route of administration was oral (62%) and the most important feature of an ideal drug was a low risk of side-effects (32%). Hierarchical clustering identified three clusters. Cluster 1 (59%) comprised patients with few comorbidities and a poor ability to identify oncoming flares; 84% of these patients desired oral treatments with limited side-effects. Cluster 2 (13%) comprised younger patients, who had already participated in a clinical trial, were willing to use implants and valued the compatibility of treatments with pregnancy. Cluster 3 (28%) comprised patients with a longer lupus duration, poorer control of the disease and more comorbidities; these patients mainly valued implants and injections and expected a reduction of corticosteroid intake.

          Conclusions

          Different profiles of lupus patients were identified according to their drug preferences. These clusters could help physicians tailor their therapeutic proposals to take into account individual patient preferences, which could have a positive impact on treatment acceptance and then adherence. The study highlights the value of data acquired directly from patient communities.

          Related collections

          Most cited references15

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Updating the American college of rheumatology revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Objective Criteria for the Evaluation of Clustering Methods

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Cluster analysis and mathematical programming

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Lupus
                Lupus
                SAGE Publications
                0961-2033
                1477-0962
                October 2021
                July 27 2021
                October 2021
                : 30
                : 11
                : 1837-1843
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Carenity, 1 rue de Stockholm, Paris, France
                [2 ]Aix-Marseille Univ, C2VN, INSERM 1263, INRAE 1260, et AP-HM, Centre de Néphrologie et Transplantation Rénale, Hôpital de la Conception, Marseille, France
                [3 ]Aix-Marseille Univ, APHM, INSERM, IRD, SESSTIM, Public Health Department, APHM, La Timone Hospital, BIOSTIC, Marseille, France
                [4 ]Service de Médecine Interne, Hôpital Européen, Marseille, France
                Article
                10.1177/09612033211033977
                34313509
                4e558700-6b0a-4667-b0c9-a8230d0a6a4a
                © 2021

                http://journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article