Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Un estudio descriptivo de la presencia, visibilidad y calidad de las revistas de terapia ocupacional Translated title: A descriptive study of the presence, visibility and quality of occupational therapy journals Translated title: Um estudo descritivo da presença, visibilidade e qualidade dos periódicos de terapia ocupacional

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Resumen Con el presente artículo intentamos conocer las revistas actuales de terapia ocupacional, así como la visibilidad y calidad de las mismas. La selección de la muestra se realizó a partir de la base de datos ULRICH y los catálogos Latindex y C17. La búsqueda se completó con un rastreo en la red. Los criterios de inclusión fueron revistas científicas revisadas por pares y activas en el momento de la consulta. Del listado final se analizaron las siguientes variables: visibilidad (se tuvo en cuenta el idioma de publicación y presencia en bases de datos internacionales -ERIC, Psychinfo, Medline, Scopus, OTDBASE, CINAHL and Web of Science), accesibilidad (suscripción, gratuidad y Open Access,) e indicadores de calidad (editorial responsable y factor de impacto). 43 revistas cumplieron los criterios. Respecto a la visiblidad el 69,8% estaban indexadas en al menos una base de datos, siendo la de mayor representatividad, la base de datos propia de la disciplina, seguidas de las de ciencias de la salud, multidisciplinares y en menor medida las de ciencias sociales. El 25,6% están incorporadas al movimiento Open Access y el 18,6% son Free Access. Respecto al prestigio, un 20,9% incorporadas a JCR y un 41,9% a SJR. Tras analizar cinco criterios de calidad, únicamente Hong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy, Irish Journal of Occupational Therapy y Occupational Therapy International los cumplen. Este estudio muestra la realidad de las revistas específicas de la especialidad, así como sus fortalezas y debilidades. Es esperado que conocer esta realidad permitirá mejorar las tasas de producción de conocimiento en terapia ocupacional.

          Translated abstract

          Abstract With this article, we try to know the current occupational therapy journals, as well as their visibility and quality. The sample selection was made from the ULRICH database and Latindex and C17 catalog. The search was completed with a web search. The inclusion criteria were active and peer-reviewed scientific journals. The variables analyzed were: Visibility (publication language, presence in databases -ERIC, Psychinfo, Medline, Scopus, OTDBASE, CINAHL, and Web of Science), accessibility (subscription, free or Open Access), and quality indicators (Journal Citation Reports and Scimago Journal Ranking). 43 journals met the criteria. Visibility 69,8% were indexed in at least one database, being the most representative, the discipline's database, followed by the health sciences, multidisciplinary and to a lesser extent those of the social sciences. 25,6% are incorporated into the Open Access movement, and 18,6% are Free Access. Prestige, 20,9% are incorporated in JCR and 41,9% in SJR. After analyzing five quality criteria, only the Hong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy, Irish Journal of Occupational Therapy, and Occupational Therapy International meet them. This study shows the reality of the specific journals of the specialty, as well as their strengths and weaknesses. We hope that knowing this reality we will improve the rates of knowledge production in occupational therapy.

          Translated abstract

          Resumo Com este artigo buscamos conhecer as revistas atuais de terapia ocupacional, bem como sua visibilidade e qualidade. A seleção da amostra foi feita a partir da base de dados ULRICH e dos catálogos Latindex e C17. A pesquisa foi concluída com um rastreamento na web. Os critérios de inclusão foram periódicos científicos revisados por pares e ativos no momento da consulta. Da lista final, foram analisadas as seguintes variáveis: visibilidade (foram considerados o idioma de publicação e a presença em bases de dados internacionais -ERIC, Psychinfo, Medline, Scopus, OTDBASE, CINAHL e Web of Science), acessibilidade (assinatura, acesso gratuito e aberto) e indicadores de qualidade (editora responsável e fator de impacto). Quarenta e três periódicos atenderam aos critérios. Quanto à visibilidade, 69,8% estiveram indexados em pelo menos uma base de dados, sendo a mais representativa a própria base de dados da disciplina, seguida das ciências multidisciplinares da saúde e, em menor escala, das da Ciências Sociais. 25,6% estão incorporados ao movimento de Acesso Aberto e 18,6% são de Acesso Livre. Em relação ao prestígio, 20,9% incorporaram-se ao JCR e 41,9%% ao SJR. Após analisar cinco critérios de qualidade, só Hong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy, Irish Journal of Occupational Therapy e a Occupational Therapy International os atendem. Este estudo mostra a realidade dos periódicos específicos da área, bem como seus pontos fortes e fracos. Acredita-se que conhecer essa realidade pode melhorar os índices de produção de conhecimento em terapia ocupacional.

          Related collections

          Most cited references31

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era

          The consolidation of the scientific publishing industry has been the topic of much debate within and outside the scientific community, especially in relation to major publishers’ high profit margins. However, the share of scientific output published in the journals of these major publishers, as well as its evolution over time and across various disciplines, has not yet been analyzed. This paper provides such analysis, based on 45 million documents indexed in the Web of Science over the period 1973-2013. It shows that in both natural and medical sciences (NMS) and social sciences and humanities (SSH), Reed-Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Springer, and Taylor & Francis increased their share of the published output, especially since the advent of the digital era (mid-1990s). Combined, the top five most prolific publishers account for more than 50% of all papers published in 2013. Disciplines of the social sciences have the highest level of concentration (70% of papers from the top five publishers), while the humanities have remained relatively independent (20% from top five publishers). NMS disciplines are in between, mainly because of the strength of their scientific societies, such as the ACS in chemistry or APS in physics. The paper also examines the migration of journals between small and big publishing houses and explores the effect of publisher change on citation impact. It concludes with a discussion on the economics of scholarly publishing.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found
            Is Open Access

            Sistemas nacionales de clasificación de revistas científicas en América Latina: tendencias recientes e implicaciones para la evaluación académica en ciencias sociales

            Resumen: Los investigadores están sujetos a múltiples instancias en las que se evalúa su producción académica. Basados en indicadores bibliométricos y en información sobre indexaciones, los consejos nacionales de ciencia y tecnología han emitido directrices para clasificar las revistas. En este trabajo realizamos una comparación de los sistemas implementados en Argentina, México y Colombia. Concluimos que las tendencias recientes en México y Colombia apuntan a una profundización de un modelo ortodoxo de evaluación académica. En Argentina, en cambio, se observa una posición más crítica sobre la pertinencia de los índices bibliométricos en las ciencias sociales. Sin embargo, en ninguno de estos países se aprecia una apuesta por formas novedosas de evaluación ligadas a la ciencia abierta y colaborativa.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Impact factor, eigenfactor, article influence, scopus SNIP, and SCImage journal rank of occupational therapy journals.

              Journals are currently assessed and ranked using a number of different quantitative performance metrics.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                cadbto
                Cadernos Brasileiros de Terapia Ocupacional
                Cad. Bras. Ter. Ocup.
                Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Departamento de Terapia Ocupacional (São Carlos, SP, Brazil )
                2526-8910
                2021
                : 29
                : e2918
                Affiliations
                [01] Galicia Galicia orgnameUniversidade da Coruña orgdiv1A Coruña Spain
                [02] Santiago de Compostela orgnameUniversidade de Santiago de Compostela Espanha
                Article
                S2526-89102021000100231 S2526-8910(21)02900000231
                10.1590/2526-8910.ctoao2205
                4e3fb861-c54f-4c69-a0bd-bd5fa177e24a

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

                History
                : 08 December 2020
                : 27 February 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 31, Pages: 0
                Product

                SciELO Brazil

                Categories
                Artículos Originales

                Scholarly Communication,Bases de Dados Bibliográficas,Publicações Periódicas como Assunto,Comunicação Acadêmica,Terapia Ocupacional,Publicaciones Científicas y Técnicas,Bases de Datos Bibliográficas,Publicaciones Periódicas como Asunto,Comunicación Académica,Scientific and Technical Publications,Bibliographic,Databases,Periodicals as Topic,Occupational Therapy,Publicações Científicas e Técnicas

                Comments

                Comment on this article