13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      New technology: Handheld ultrasound-assisted localization of epidural space

      letter

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Sir, Anatomical landmarks are useful but are surrogate markers, difficult to palpate in the obese and those with edema in the back, do not take into account anatomical variations or abnormalities and frequently (70%) lead to incorrect identification of a given lumbar interspace.[1] Recently, there has been an increase in interest in the use of ultrasound (US) to guide during central neuraxial blocks (epidural or combined spinal-epidural, either to preview the anatomy before needle puncture or to visualize the advancing needle in real time).[2] Preprocedural ultrasonography of the spine can supply much anatomical information pertinent to central neuraxial blockade, including the location of the neuraxial midline and interlaminar spaces and the depth of the epidural space and intrathecal space.[3] The recent development of a handheld US (Rivanna Accuro™) as shown in Figure 1 has inbuilt software which automates midline and epidural depth measurement and improves spinal placement.[4] We report a case, for which we used this handheld US to identify midline and epidural space depth. Figure 1 Handheld ultrasound (Rivanna Accuro™) with its part A 65-year-old male known case of osteoarthritis and analgesic-induced nephropathy with body mass index 32.4 presented for the left total knee replacement. The preview US scan was performed in the preoperative room. The US probe was placed in transverse view over desired intervertebral space. This handheld US (Accuro™ US system) has inbuilt software which automates midline and epidural depth measurement as shown in Figure 2. Epidural space depth was 5.8 cm in this patient. This device has Accuro Locator™ which can be fitted over probe as shown in Figure 1. After identifying the midline and epidural space depth, we firmly pressed Accuro™ locator over back. It produced 4 marks over back (2 vertical and 2 horizontal) by joining these points we got puncture site. It was marked with permanent marker. Figure 2 Midline identification and epidural space depth The patient was taken to operative room and placed in the sitting position. The Tuohy needle was gradually advanced through puncture site under strict sterile condition up to distance 5 cm directly. Epidural space was confirmed by testing for loss of resistance (LOR) to injection of air using the standard LOR syringe. The needle was marked after achieving LOR with sterile marker. Epidural space was identified at distance of 5.7 cm. Time for epidural space localization was just 28 s. Space was located in the first attempt without any bony touch or other complications. Although handheld US-guided (USG) epidural space localization required less time, less attempts for localization of epidural space, large study is required to establish its utility and to prove the relationship between USG measured depth and actual needle depth. This handheld US device (Accuro™) is a single self-contained unit consisting of a US system, US probe and rotatable touchscreen display. The instrument provides a SPINE imaging preset to facilitate spinal anesthesia imaging guidance with real-time three-dimensional (3D) navigation of the lumbar spine. The SPINE preset uses patent-pending technology, called SpineNav3DTM, to automate spinal bone landmark detection and depth measurements and to assess real-time scan plane orientation in 3D. Accuro™ is about the size of a smartphone and battery operated, and the touchscreen can be rotated for easy viewing.[5] The case described here is the representative case, and further studies are required for proving this device effectiveness, affordability, and reliability in comparison to conventional USG machine. Declaration of patient consent The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed. Financial support and sponsorship Nil. Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest.

          Related collections

          Most cited references4

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Real-time ultrasound-guided paramedian epidural access: evaluation of a novel in-plane technique.

          Current methods of locating the epidural space rely on surface anatomical landmarks and loss-of-resistance (LOR). We are not aware of any data describing real-time ultrasound (US)-guided epidural access in adults. We evaluated the feasibility of performing real-time US-guided paramedian epidural access with the epidural needle inserted in the plane of the US beam in 15 adults who were undergoing groin or lower limb surgery under an epidural or combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia. The epidural space was successfully identified in 14 of 15 (93.3%) patients in 1 (1-3) attempt using the technique described. There was a failure to locate the epidural space in one elderly man. In 8 of 15 (53.3%) patients, studied neuraxial changes, that is, anterior displacement of the posterior dura and widening of the posterior epidural space, were seen immediately after entry of the Tuohy needle and expulsion of the pressurized saline from the LOR syringe into the epidural space at the level of needle insertion. Compression of the thecal sac was also seen in two of these patients. There were no inadvertent dural punctures or complications directly related to the technique described. Anaesthesia adequate for surgery developed in all patients after the initial spinal or epidural injection and recovery from the epidural or spinal anaesthesia was also uneventful. We have demonstrated the successful use of real-time US guidance in combination with LOR to saline for paramedian epidural access with the epidural needle inserted in the plane of the US beam.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A randomized controlled trial of ultrasound-assisted lumbar puncture.

            Evidence showing the systematic utility of ultrasound imaging during lumbar puncture (LP) in the emergency department is lacking. Our hypothesis was that ultrasound-assisted LP would increase the success rate and ease of performing LP with a greater benefit in obese patients. This was an Institutional Review Board-approved, randomized, prospective, double-blind study conducted at the emergency department of a teaching institution. Patients undergoing LP from January to December 2004 were eligible for enrollment. Patients were randomized to undergo LP using palpation landmarks (PLs) or ultrasound landmarks (ULs). Data collected included age, body mass index, number of attempts, ease of performance and patient comfort on a 10-cm Visual Analog Scale, procedure time, success, and traumatic LP. Statistical analysis of data included relative risk (RR), the Mann-Whitney U test, and the Student t test. A total of 46 patients were enrolled, 22 randomized to PLs and 24 to ULs. There were no differences between the groups in mean age or body mass index. Six of 22 attempts failed with PLs versus 1 of 24 with ULs (RR, 1.32; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.72). In 12 obese patients, 4 of 7 PL attempts failed versus 0 of 5 UL attempts (RR, 2.33; 95% confidence interval, 0.99-5.49). The ease of the procedure was better with ULs versus PLs. There were no statistical differences in the number of attempts, traumatic LPs, patient comfort, or procedure length. The use of ultrasound for LP significantly reduced the number of failures in all patients and improved the ease of the procedure in obese patients.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Does Automated Interpretation of Lumbar Spine Ultrasound Images Increase Success Rate of Spinal Anesthesia Placement for Cesarean Birth among Residents in Training? SOAP 49th Annual Meeting, Bellevue; May

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Saudi J Anaesth
                Saudi J Anaesth
                SJA
                Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia
                Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd (India )
                1658-354X
                0975-3125
                Apr-Jun 2018
                : 12
                : 2
                : 365-367
                Affiliations
                [1]Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Management, Jagjivanram Railway Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
                Author notes
                Address for correspondence: Dr. Jitendra Homdas Ramteke, Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Management, Jagjivan Ram Railway Hospital, Mumbai - 400 008, Maharashtra, India. E-mail: drjituram@ 123456gmail.com
                Article
                SJA-12-365
                10.4103/sja.SJA_696_17
                5875244
                29628866
                4e0db56d-8e67-4cc8-8c52-59354fcff3fe
                Copyright: © 2018 Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

                History
                Categories
                Letters to Editor

                Anesthesiology & Pain management
                Anesthesiology & Pain management

                Comments

                Comment on this article