8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Communication, Cognition and Competency Development in Healthcare: A Model for Integrating Cognitive Ethnography and Communication Skills Training in Clinical Interventions

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          OBJECTIVES

          The aim of this study was to conduct and evaluate the Blended Learning communication skills training program. The key objective was to investigate (i) how clinical intervention studies can be designed to include cognitive, organizational, and interactive processes, and (ii) how researchers and practitioners could work with integrated methods to support the desired change.

          METHODS

          The method combined design and implementation of a 12-week Blended Learning communication skills training program based on the Calgary-Cambridge Guide. The training was implemented in a patient clinic at a Danish university hospital and targeted all healthcare professionals at the clinic. Cognitive ethnography was used to document and evaluate healthcare professionals’ implementation and individual competency development, and support the design of in-situ simulation training scenarios.

          RESULTS

          Thirteen participants completed the program. The synergy within the teams, as well as the opportunities for participants to coordinate, share, discuss, and reflect on the received knowledge with a colleague or on-site researcher, affected learning positively. The knowledge transfer process was affected by negative feedback loops, such as time shortages, issues with concept development and transfer, disjuncture between the expectations of participants and instructors of the overall course structure, as well as participant insecurity and a gradual loss of motivation and compliance.

          CONCLUSION

          We propose a novel 3-step model for clinical interventions based on our findings and literature review. This model will effectively support the implementation of educational interventions in health care by narrowing the theory-practice gap. It will also stimulate desired change in individual behavior and organizational culture over time. Furthermore, it will work for the benefit of the clinic and may be more suitable for the implementation of communication projects than, for example, randomized setups.

          Related collections

          Most cited references134

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations.

          This article summarizes an extensive literature review addressing the question, How can we spread and sustain innovations in health service delivery and organization? It considers both content (defining and measuring the diffusion of innovation in organizations) and process (reviewing the literature in a systematic and reproducible way). This article discusses (1) a parsimonious and evidence-based model for considering the diffusion of innovations in health service organizations, (2) clear knowledge gaps where further research should be focused, and (3) a robust and transferable methodology for systematically reviewing health service policy and management. Both the model and the method should be tested more widely in a range of contexts.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            How does communication heal? Pathways linking clinician-patient communication to health outcomes.

            Although prior research indicates that features of clinician-patient communication can predict health outcomes weeks and months after the consultation, the mechanisms accounting for these findings are poorly understood. While talk itself can be therapeutic (e.g., lessening the patient's anxiety, providing comfort), more often clinician-patient communication influences health outcomes via a more indirect route. Proximal outcomes of the interaction include patient understanding, trust, and clinician-patient agreement. These affect intermediate outcomes (e.g., increased adherence, better self-care skills) which, in turn, affect health and well-being. Seven pathways through which communication can lead to better health include increased access to care, greater patient knowledge and shared understanding, higher quality medical decisions, enhanced therapeutic alliances, increased social support, patient agency and empowerment, and better management of emotions. Future research should hypothesize pathways connecting communication to health outcomes and select measures specific to that pathway. Clinicians and patients should maximize the therapeutic effects of communication by explicitly orienting communication to achieve intermediate outcomes (e.g., trust, mutual understanding, adherence, social support, self-efficacy) associated with improved health.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Professional Vision

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Med Educ Curric Dev
                J Med Educ Curric Dev
                MDE
                spmde
                Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development
                SAGE Publications (Sage UK: London, England )
                2382-1205
                9 January 2024
                Jan-Dec 2024
                : 11
                : 23821205231223319
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Center for Human Interactivity, Department of Culture and Communication, Ringgold 6174, universityUniversity of Southern Denmark; , Odense, Denmark
                [2 ]Centre for Human Interactivity, Department of Language, Culture, History and Communication, Ringgold 6174, universityUniversity of Southern Denmark; , Odense, Denmark
                [3 ]Centre for Culture and the Mind, Department of English, Germanic and Romance Studies, Ringgold 4321, universityUniversity of Copenhagen; , Copenhagen, Denmark
                [4 ]Danish Institute for Advanced Study, Ringgold 6174, universityUniversity of Southern Denmark; , Odense, Denmark
                [5 ]Center for Ecolinguistics, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China
                [6 ]College of International Studies, Southwest University, Chongqing, China
                Author notes
                [*]Daria Schwalbe, Center for Patient Communication (CFPK), Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense University Hospital, Kløvervænget 12B, 116, Odense, Syddanmark 5230, Denmark. Email: daria@ 123456hum.ku.dk
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5918-8819
                Article
                10.1177_23821205231223319
                10.1177/23821205231223319
                10777782
                38204973
                4d860176-097b-4073-b22e-4661374f7ce7
                © The Author(s) 2024

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page ( https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

                History
                : 2 February 2023
                : 11 December 2023
                Categories
                Original Research Article
                Custom metadata
                ts19
                January-December 2024

                clinical interventions,design and assessment of interventions,health communication,person-centered care,blended learning,cognitive ethnography,in situ simulation,calgary cambridge guide

                Comments

                Comment on this article