11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Recommendations for improving accessibility of digital health interventions for cardiometabolic disease for ethnically diverse populations

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Digital health interventions (DHIs), such as apps, websites and wearables, are being presented as solutions or enablers to manage the burden of cardiometabolic disease in healthcare. However, the potential benefits of DHIs may not be reaching the most in-need populations, who may face intersecting barriers to accessing health services and digital solutions. The Digital Interventions for South Asians in Cardiometabolic Disease (DISC) study used a mixed-method approach to focus on people of a South Asian background, a high-risk group for cardiometabolic disease. A one-day workshop was held in May 2023 with key stakeholders, including people with lived experience, health professionals, technology innovators and policymakers ( n = 34), to develop recommendations arising from the DISC study findings. Discussions covered four areas: actions to support individuals to access and benefit from DHIs; translating learning about inclusive design into practice; the role of regulation and evaluation to improve inclusivity of DHIs used within the health service; and improving quality of data collection and use to reduce inequalities related to digital health and cardiometabolic disease. Our recommendations align with recent national strategies and provide specific examples of actions that can be taken to address digital inequalities for ethnic minority populations.

          Related collections

          Most cited references12

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The Global Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases and Risk

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Digital health interventions for the prevention of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

            To assess the potential benefit of digital health interventions (DHIs) on cardiovascular disease (CVD) outcomes (CVD events, all-cause mortality, hospitalizations) and risk factors compared with non-DHIs.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Barriers and facilitators of the uptake of digital health technology in cardiovascular care: a systematic scoping review

              Digital health technology (DHT) has the potential to revolutionize healthcare delivery but its uptake has been low in clinical and research settings. The factors that contribute to the limited adoption of DHT, particularly in cardiovascular settings, are unclear. The objective of this review was to determine the barriers and facilitators of DHT uptake from the perspective of patients, clinicians, and researchers. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL databases for studies published from inception to May 2020 that reported barriers and/or facilitators of DHT adoption in cardiovascular care. We extracted data on study design, setting, cardiovascular condition, and type of DHT. We conducted a thematic analysis to identify barriers and facilitators of DHT uptake. The search identified 3075 unique studies, of which 29 studies met eligibility criteria. Studies employed: qualitative methods ( n = 13), which included interviews and focus groups; quantitative methods ( n = 5), which included surveys; or a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods ( n = 11). Twenty-five studies reported patient-level barriers, most common of which were difficult-to-use technology ( n =7) and a poor internet connection ( n =7). Six studies reported clinician-level barriers, which included increased workload ( n =4) and a lack of integration with electronic medical records ( n =3).Twenty-four studies reported patient-level facilitators, which included improved communication with clinicians ( n =10) and personalized technology ( n =6). Four studies reported clinician-level facilitators, which included approval and organizational support from cardiology departments and/or hospitals ( n =3) and technologies that improved efficiency ( n =3). No studies reported researcher-level barriers or facilitators. In summary, internet access, user-friendliness, organizational support, workflow efficiency, and data integration were reported as important factors in the uptake of DHT by patients and clinicians. These factors can be considered when selecting and implementing DHTs in cardiovascular clinical settings.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Digit Health
                Digit Health
                DHJ
                spdhj
                Digital Health
                SAGE Publications (Sage UK: London, England )
                2055-2076
                28 January 2025
                Jan-Dec 2025
                : 11
                : 20552076241272600
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Institute of Health Informatics, UCL, London, UK
                [2 ]Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
                [3 ]Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
                [4 ]DISC Study, Patient and Public Involvement Representative, London, UK
                [5 ]University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
                [6 ]Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
                [7 ]Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
                [8 ]Diabetes Research Centre, Leicester General Hospital, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
                [9 ]Department of Psychological Interventions, School of Psychology, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, UK
                [10 ]Department of Cardiology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
                Author notes
                [*]Mel Ramasawmy, Institute of Health Informatics, UCL, 222 Euston Road, London, NW1 2DA, UK. Email: m.ramasawmy@ 123456ucl.ac.uk
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4864-8565
                Article
                10.1177_20552076241272600
                10.1177/20552076241272600
                11773512
                39877854
                4d74b4e7-3c4c-4856-b596-6ee997dccd09
                © The Author(s) 2025

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page ( https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

                History
                : 28 March 2024
                : 17 July 2024
                Funding
                Funded by: National Institute for Health and Care Research, FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/501100000272;
                Award ID: NIHR200937
                Categories
                Brief Communication
                Custom metadata
                ts19
                January-December 2025

                cardiovascular disease,diabetes,digital health,ehealth,qualitative

                Comments

                Comment on this article