0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Fully remote versus hybrid supervision of pulmonary telerehabilitation in COVID-19: a randomized clinical trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          BACKGROUND

          The restrictions imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic have impeded the traditional rehabilitation process, prompting the widespread adoption of remote programs for the recovery of survivors.

          AIM

          The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of a pulmonary telerehabilitation program (PTRP) in the exclusively remote modality versus the hybrid modality (remote and face-to-face) in patients with persistent respiratory dysfunction following hospitalization for COVID-19 pneumonia, and to compare the functional capacity of patients who participated in a PTRP with those who did not.

          DESIGN

          A randomised, interventional, prospective clinical trial was conducted. In parallel, an observational cohort study was conducted.

          SETTING

          Outpatient rehabilitation clinic and home-based rehabilitation program.

          POPULATION

          Thirty patients post-COVID-19 were randomised into two groups: G1 (fully remote supervision of PTRP) or G2 (hybrid supervision of PTRP). Thirty-seven post-COVID-19 patients were followed up without participating in PTRP (non-intervention group - NIG).

          METHODS

          Patients with persistent respiratory dysfunction and reduced functional capacity, as measured by the Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT), after hospitalization for COVID-19 pneumonia, were considered eligible for a PTRP. To assess the efficacy of the PTRP, the primary outcome (I) was distance walked on the 6MWT (6MWD) and the secondary outcome (II) was quality of life as assessed by the SF-36 questionnaire.

          RESULTS

          Both G1 and G2 demonstrated similar improvement in 6MWD, P<0.001 and quality of life (P<0.05). The IG showed higher 6MWD than the NIG (P<0.001). The increase in 6MWD for the IG was 140.5 m, while for the NIG it was 16.8 m (P=0.002).

          CONCLUSIONS

          The PTRP was found to be a feasible and highly effective intervention for restoring functional capacity and improving quality of life, regardless of the type of supervision. Furthermore, this functional gain was maintained over the long term. In patients with pulmonary dysfunction, participation in the PTRP improved functional capacity compared with those who were simply advised to resume physical activity during recovery.

          CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT

          Telerehabilitation has been demonstrated to be a viable and efficacious alternative to traditional in-person programs in low-income contexts.

          Related collections

          Most cited references41

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.

          Research electronic data capture (REDCap) is a novel workflow methodology and software solution designed for rapid development and deployment of electronic data capture tools to support clinical and translational research. We present: (1) a brief description of the REDCap metadata-driven software toolset; (2) detail concerning the capture and use of study-related metadata from scientific research teams; (3) measures of impact for REDCap; (4) details concerning a consortium network of domestic and international institutions collaborating on the project; and (5) strengths and limitations of the REDCap system. REDCap is currently supporting 286 translational research projects in a growing collaborative network including 27 active partner institutions.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            ATS statement: guidelines for the six-minute walk test.

            (2002)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A clinical case definition of post-COVID-19 condition by a Delphi consensus

              People with COVID-19 might have sustained postinfection sequelae. Known by a variety of names, including long COVID or long-haul COVID, and listed in the ICD-10 classification as post-COVID-19 condition since September, 2020, this occurrence is variable in its expression and its impact. The absence of a globally standardised and agreed-upon definition hampers progress in characterisation of its epidemiology and the development of candidate treatments. In a WHO-led Delphi process, we engaged with an international panel of 265 patients, clinicians, researchers, and WHO staff to develop a consensus definition for this condition. 14 domains and 45 items were evaluated in two rounds of the Delphi process to create a final consensus definition for adults: post-COVID-19 condition occurs in individuals with a history of probable or confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, usually 3 months from the onset, with symptoms that last for at least 2 months and cannot be explained by an alternative diagnosis. Common symptoms include, but are not limited to, fatigue, shortness of breath, and cognitive dysfunction, and generally have an impact on everyday functioning. Symptoms might be new onset following initial recovery from an acute COVID-19 episode or persist from the initial illness. Symptoms might also fluctuate or relapse over time. A separate definition might be applicable for children. Although the consensus definition is likely to change as knowledge increases, this common framework provides a foundation for ongoing and future studies of epidemiology, risk factors, clinical characteristics, and therapy.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Eur J Phys Rehabil Med
                Eur J Phys Rehabil Med
                EJPRM
                European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
                Edizioni Minerva Medica
                1973-9087
                1973-9095
                20 December 2024
                February 2025
                : 61
                : 1
                : 141-153
                Affiliations
                deptPhysiotherapy and Occupational Therapy Service, University Hospital , University of Campinas , Campinas, Brazil; deptDivision of Pneumology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences , University of Campinas , Campinas, Brazil; deptDivision of Infectivology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences , University of Campinas , Campinas, Brazil
                []Members are listed at the end of the paper
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author: Bruna S. Vian, Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy Service, UNICAMP - University of Campinas, Rua Vital Brasil 251, Cidade Universitária, 13083-888 Campinas, Brazil. E-mail: brusvian@ 123456unicamp.br

                Authors’ contributions: All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

                Article
                8634
                10.23736/S1973-9087.24.08634-9
                11920754
                39704643
                4d5f8d97-9b12-49e2-82e7-cd8c67dbf172
                2024 THE AUTHORS

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 License.

                History
                : 25 November 2024
                : 28 October 2024
                : 09 June 2024
                Funding
                Funded by: São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP)
                Award ID: 2020/10087-0
                Funded by: Fund for the Support of Education, Research and Extension (FAEPEX)
                Award ID: 243/20, 2651/21
                Categories
                Article

                telerehabilitation,covid-19,walk test,quality of life
                telerehabilitation, covid-19, walk test, quality of life

                Comments

                Comment on this article