8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Single-incision vaginal approach to treat cystocele and vault prolapse with an anterior wall mesh anchored apically to the sacrospinous ligaments

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction and hypothesis

          The safety and early efficacy of a new technique to treat cystocele and/or concomitant apical prolapse through a single vaginal incision with a lightweight mesh anchored apically bilaterally to the sacrospinous ligaments is reported.

          Methods

          Women with anterior compartment and/or apical prolapse ≥stage II underwent repair through a single anterior vaginal wall incision with the Anterior Elevate System (AES). The technique utilizes a lightweight (24 g/m 2) type I mesh anchored to the sacrospinous ligaments via two mesh arms with small self-fixating tips. The bladder neck portion of the graft is anchored to the obturator internus with similar self-fixating tips. The apical portion of the graft is adjustable to vaginal length prior to locking in place. Outcome measures included prolapse degree at last follow-up visit, intra/post-operative complications, and QOL assessments.

          Results

          Sixty patients were implanted with average follow-up of 13.4 months (range 3–24 months). Mean pre-op Ba was +2.04 ± 1.3 and C −2.7 ± 2.9. Average blood loss was 47 cc and average hospital stay was 23 h. Sixty-two percent of patients had concomitant sling for SUI. Mean post-op Ba is −2.45 ± 0.9 and C −8.3 ± 0.9. There was no statistical difference in pre- to post-op TVL. Objective cure rate at current follow-up is 91.7% (≤stage 1). To date, there have been no mesh extrusions. No patients have reported significant buttock or leg pain. No patients have required surgical revision for any reason.

          Conclusion

          The AES is a minimally invasive technique to treat anterior compartment and/or apical prolapse through a single vaginal incision. Initial results show the procedure to be safe and early efficacy is promising. Longer-term follow-up is ongoing.

          Related collections

          Most cited references15

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a comprehensive review.

          To summarize published data about abdominal sacrocolpopexy and to highlight areas about which data are lacking. We conducted a literature search on MEDLINE using Ovid and PubMed, from January,1966 to January, 2004, using search terms "sacropexy," "sacrocolpopexy," "sacral colpopexy," "colpopexy," "sacropexy," "colposacropexy," "abdominal sacrocolpopexy" "pelvic organ prolapse and surgery," and "vaginal vault prolapse or surgery" and included articles with English-language abstracts. We examined reference lists of published articles to identify other articles not found on the electronic search. We examined all studies identified in our search that provided any outcome data on sacrocolpopexy. Because of the substantial heterogeneity of outcome measures and follow-up intervals in case studies, we did not apply meta-analytic techniques to the data. Follow-up duration for most studies ranged from 6 months to 3 years. The success rate, when defined as lack of apical prolapse postoperatively, ranged from 78-100% and when defined as no postoperative prolapse, from 58-100%. The median reoperation rates for pelvic organ prolapse and for stress urinary incontinence in the studies that reported these outcomes were 4.4% (range 0-18.2%) and 4.9% (range 1.2% to 30.9%), respectively. The overall rate of mesh erosion was 3.4% (70 of 2,178). Some reports found more mesh erosions when concomitant total hysterectomy was done, whereas other reports did not. There were no data to either support or refute the contentions that concomitant culdoplasty or paravaginal repair decreased the risk of failure. Most authors recommended burying the graft under the peritoneum to attempt to decrease the risk of bowel obstruction; despite this, the median rate (when reported) of small bowel obstruction requiring surgery was 1.1% (range 0.6% to 8.6%). Few studies rigorously assessed pelvic symptoms, bowel function, or sexual function. Sacrocolpopexy is a reliable procedure that effectively and consistently resolves vaginal vault prolapse. Patients should be counseled about the low, but present risk, of reoperation for prolapse, stress incontinence, and complications. Prospective trials are needed to understand the effect of sacrocolpopexy on functional outcomes.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Trocar-guided mesh compared with conventional vaginal repair in recurrent prolapse: a randomized controlled trial.

            To compare efficacy and safety of trocar-guided tension-free vaginal mesh insertion with conventional vaginal prolapse repair in patients with recurrent pelvic organ prolapse. Patients with recurrent pelvic organ prolapse stage II or higher were randomly assigned to either conventional vaginal prolapse surgery or polypropylene mesh insertion. Primary outcome was anatomic failure (pelvic organ prolapse stage II or higher) in the treated vaginal compartments. Secondary outcomes were subjective improvement, effects on bother, quality of life, and adverse events. Questionnaires such as the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and Urogenital Distress Inventory were administered at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. Anatomic outcomes were assessed by an unblinded surgeon. Power calculation with α=0.05 and β=0.80 indicated that 194 patients were needed. Ninety-seven women underwent conventional repair and 93 mesh repair. The follow-up rate after 12 months was 186 of 190 patients (98%). Twelve months postsurgery, anatomic failure in the treated compartment was observed in 38 of 84 patients (45.2%) in the conventional group and in eight of 83 patients (9.6%) in the mesh group (P<.001; odds ratio, 7.7; 95% confidence interval, 3.3-18). Patients in either group reported less bulge and overactive bladder symptoms. Subjective improvement was reported by 64 of 80 patients (80%) in the conventional group compared with 63 of 78 patients (81%) in the mesh group. Mesh exposure was detected in 14 of 83 patients (16.9%). At 12 months, the number of anatomic failures observed after tension-free vaginal mesh insertion was less than after conventional vaginal prolapse repair. Symptom decrease and improvement of quality of life were equal in both groups. ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00372190. I.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Complications requiring reoperation following vaginal mesh kit procedures for prolapse.

              The objective of the study was to the characterize the symptoms and management of vaginal mesh-related complications requiring operative intervention. This was a case series of patients undergoing excision of vaginal graft material. Only women who had vaginal mesh placement for the correction of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) were included. We describe the symptoms, complications, and management of women treated surgically for vaginal mesh-related complications. Thirteen referred women underwent surgery for vaginal mesh-related complications. All meshes were Apogee and/or Perigee. Ten had symptomatic mesh exposures, 1 had an exposure with pelvic abscess, and 2 had pain syndromes without mesh exposure. Patients also had rectovaginal fistula, vesicovaginal fistula, recurrent POP, and persistent discharge. Five women had prior surgery for this problem. All patients underwent transvaginal mesh excision and other indicated procedures at our institution, and 6 women required a second surgery at our institution, with a median of 2 surgeries per patient. Vaginal mesh placement for POP can be associated with pain, exposure, and fistula formation, requiring multiple operative interventions.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                rdm@miklosandmoore.com , www.atlurogyn.com
                Journal
                Int Urogynecol J
                International Urogynecology Journal
                Springer-Verlag (London )
                0937-3462
                1433-3023
                25 August 2011
                25 August 2011
                January 2012
                : 23
                : 1
                : 85-91
                Affiliations
                Atlanta Urogynecology Associates, Atlanta, GA USA
                Article
                1536
                10.1007/s00192-011-1536-7
                3251774
                21866442
                4d55b87f-9e77-44b6-b137-9e260ef79260
                © The Author(s) 2011
                History
                : 21 February 2011
                : 11 July 2011
                Categories
                Original Article
                Custom metadata
                © The International Urogynecological Association 2012

                Obstetrics & Gynecology
                elevate,vaginal mesh,cystocele,mesh complications,sacrospinous ligament
                Obstetrics & Gynecology
                elevate, vaginal mesh, cystocele, mesh complications, sacrospinous ligament

                Comments

                Comment on this article