4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Preparation for implementation of evidence-based practices in urban schools: A shared process with implementing partners

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Shifting organizational priorities can negatively affect the sustainment of innovations in community settings. Shifting priorities can present barriers to conducting clinical research in schools if a misalignment occurs between school district priorities and the aims of the study. Often this misalignment occurs due to a shift during the period between when the study is submitted for funding and when research activities begin. Participatory research approaches can be employed to restore alignment between study processes and school district priorities. The purpose of the study is to describe data from a shared process with district partners. The shared process resulted in modifications to the main study's implementation processes and strategies in order to restore alignment with evolving school priorities while remaining faithful to the aims of the study.

          Method

          Data originated from qualitative interviews conducted with 20 school district and school personnel in a large urban school district. Qualitative themes were organized into categories based on a social-ecological school implementation framework. Data from team meetings, meetings with school district administrators, and emails served to supplement and verify findings from interview analyses.

          Results

          Themes included barriers and facilitators at the macro-, school-, individual-, team-, and implementation quality levels. Adaptations were made to address barriers and facilitators and restore alignment with school district priorities. Most adaptations to study processes and implementation strategies focused on re-training and providing more information to school district coaches and school-based staff. New procedures were created, and resources were re-allocated for the larger study.

          Conclusions

          Findings were discussed in relation to the implementation literature in schools. Recommendations for sustaining strong collaboration among researchers and school partners are provided.

          Plain Language Summary Title

          Preparation for Implementation of Evidence-Based Practices in Urban Schools: A Shared Process with Implementing Partners

          Plain Language Summary

          School-based implementation research requires a strong partnership between schools and researchers to ensure that the processes and implementation strategies of the study align with evolving school district priorities and processes. The article describes a stakeholder engagement process conducted during the preparation phase of implementation. The process resulted in the re-alignment of study processes and implementation strategies, and goals and priorities of the school district.

          Related collections

          Most cited references49

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Using thematic analysis in psychology

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies: Guided by Information Power

            Sample sizes must be ascertained in qualitative studies like in quantitative studies but not by the same means. The prevailing concept for sample size in qualitative studies is "saturation." Saturation is closely tied to a specific methodology, and the term is inconsistently applied. We propose the concept "information power" to guide adequate sample size for qualitative studies. Information power indicates that the more information the sample holds, relevant for the actual study, the lower amount of participants is needed. We suggest that the size of a sample with sufficient information power depends on (a) the aim of the study, (b) sample specificity, (c) use of established theory, (d) quality of dialogue, and (e) analysis strategy. We present a model where these elements of information and their relevant dimensions are related to information power. Application of this model in the planning and during data collection of a qualitative study is discussed.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Demonstrating Rigor Using Thematic Analysis: A Hybrid Approach of Inductive and Deductive Coding and Theme Development

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Implement Res Pract
                Implement Res Pract
                IRP
                spirp
                Implementation Research and Practice
                SAGE Publications (Sage UK: London, England )
                2633-4895
                9 September 2024
                Jan-Dec 2024
                : 5
                : 26334895241279503
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Roberts Center for Pediatric Research, Ringgold 6567, universityChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia; , Philadelphia, PA, USA
                [2 ]Department of Pediatrics, Ringgold 14640, universityUniversity of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine; , Philadelphia, PA, USA
                [3 ]Department of Psychiatry, Ringgold 14640, universityUniversity of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine; , Philadelphia, PA, USA
                [4 ]Ringgold 6556, universitySchool of Professional & Applied Psychology, Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine; , Philadelphia, PA, USA
                [5 ]OCD and Anxiety Institute, Bryn Mawr, PA, USA
                [6 ]Ringgold 118792, universitySchool District of Philadelphia; , Philadelphia, PA, USA
                Author notes
                [*]Ricardo Eiraldi, Roberts Center for Pediatric Research, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 2716 South Street, Suite 8293, Philadelphia, PA 19146-2305, USA. Email: eiraldi@ 123456chop.edu
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3997-696X
                Article
                10.1177_26334895241279503
                10.1177/26334895241279503
                11384528
                39257916
                4d35f383-1fca-48f5-8505-5f4114e4478c
                © The Author(s) 2024

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page ( https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

                History
                Funding
                Funded by: National Institute of Mental Health, FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/100000025;
                Award ID: R01MH4869657
                Categories
                Original Empirical Research
                Custom metadata
                ts19
                January-December 2024

                evidence-based practices,protocol adaptations,urban schools,shared process

                Comments

                Comment on this article