17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Evaluation of data-driven respiratory gating waveforms for clinical PET imaging

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          We aimed to evaluate the clinical robustness of a commercially developed data-driven respiratory gating algorithm based on principal component analysis, for use in routine PET imaging.

          Methods

          One hundred fifty-seven adult FDG PET examinations comprising a total of 1149 acquired bed positions were used for the assessment. These data are representative of FDG scans currently performed at our institution. Data were acquired for 4 min/bed position (3 min/bed for legs). The data-driven gating (DDG) algorithm was applied to each bed position, including those where minimal respiratory motion was expected. The algorithm provided a signal-to-noise measure of respiratory-like frequencies within the data, denoted as R. Qualitative evaluation was performed by visual examination of the waveforms, with each waveform scored on a 3-point scale by two readers and then averaged (score S of 0 = no respiratory signal, 1 = some respiratory-like signal but indeterminate, 2 = acceptable signal considered to be respiratory). Images were reconstructed using quiescent period gating and compared with non-gated images reconstructed with a matched number of coincidences. If present, the SUV max of a well-defined lesion in the thorax or abdomen was measured and compared between the two reconstructions.

          Results

          There was a strong ( r = 0.86) and significant correlation between R and scores S. Eighty-six percent of waveforms with R ≥ 15 were scored as acceptable for respiratory gating. On average, there were 1.2 bed positions per patient examination with R ≥ 15. Waveforms with high R and S were found to originate from bed positions corresponding to the thorax and abdomen: 90% of waveforms with R ≥ 15 had bed centres in the range 5.6 cm superior to 27 cm inferior from the dome of the liver. For regions where respiratory motion was expected to be minimal, R tended to be < 6 and S tended to be 0. The use of DDG significantly increased the SUV max of focal lesions, by an average of 11% when considering lesions in bed positions with R ≥ 15.

          Conclusions

          The majority of waveforms with high R corresponded to the part of the patient where respiratory motion was expected. The waveforms were deemed suitable for respiratory gating when assessed visually, and when used were found to increase SUV max in focal lesions.

          Related collections

          Most cited references13

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Phantom and Clinical Evaluation of the Bayesian Penalized Likelihood Reconstruction Algorithm Q.Clear on an LYSO PET/CT System.

          Q.Clear, a Bayesian penalized-likelihood reconstruction algorithm for PET, was recently introduced by GE Healthcare on their PET scanners to improve clinical image quality and quantification. In this work, we determined the optimum penalization factor (beta) for clinical use of Q.Clear and compared Q.Clear with standard PET reconstructions.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Respiratory motion artifacts on PET emission images obtained using CT attenuation correction on PET-CT.

            PET-CT scanners allow generation of transmission maps from CT. The use of CT attenuation correction (CTAC) instead of germanium-68 attenuation correction (Ge AC) might be expected to cause artifacts on reconstructed emission images if differences in respiratory status exist between the two methods of attenuation correction. The aim of this study was to evaluate for possible respiratory motion artifacts (RMA) in PET images attenuation corrected with CT from PET-CT in clinical patients. PET-CT scans were performed using a Discovery LS PET-CT system in 50 consecutive patients (23 males, 27 females; mean age 58.2 years) with known or suspected malignancy. Both CTAC and Ge AC transmission data obtained during free tidal breathing were used to correct PET emission images. Cold artifacts at the interface of the lungs and diaphragm, believed to be due to respiratory motion (RMA), that were seen on CTAC images but not on the Ge AC images were evaluated qualitatively on a four-point scale (0, no artifact; 1, mild artifact; 2, moderate artifact; 3, severe artifact). RMA was also measured for height. Curvilinear cold artifacts paralleling the dome of the diaphragm at the lung/diaphragm interface were noted on 84% of PET-CT image acquisitions and were not seen on the (68)Ge-corrected images; however, these artifacts were infrequently severe. In conclusion, RMA of varying magnitude were noted in most of our patients as a curvilinear cold area at the lung/diaphragm interface, but were not diagnostically problematic in these patients.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Impact of Data-driven Respiratory Gating in Clinical PET

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                + 44 (0)1865 226718 , matthew.walker@ouh.nhs.uk
                Andrew.Morgan@ouh.nhs.uk
                Lisa.Meade@ouh.nhs.uk
                Daniel.McGowan@ouh.nhs.uk
                Journal
                EJNMMI Res
                EJNMMI Res
                EJNMMI Research
                Springer Berlin Heidelberg (Berlin/Heidelberg )
                2191-219X
                3 January 2019
                3 January 2019
                2019
                : 9
                : 1
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0001 0440 1440, GRID grid.410556.3, Radiation Physics and Protection, Churchill Hospital, , Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, ; Oxford, OX3 7LE UK
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0001 0440 1440, GRID grid.410556.3, Department of Radiology, Churchill Hospital, , Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, ; Oxford, UK
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8948, GRID grid.4991.5, Department of Oncology, Old Road Campus Research Building, , University of Oxford, ; Oxford, UK
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0829-0869
                Article
                470
                10.1186/s13550-018-0470-9
                6318161
                30607651
                4bfd61fc-4564-4b6b-9665-e440eccaa95a
                © The Author(s). 2019

                Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

                History
                : 17 October 2018
                : 18 December 2018
                Funding
                Funded by: NIHR Trainee Coordinating Centre
                Award ID: ICA-CL-2016-02-009
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Original Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2019

                Radiology & Imaging
                pet/ct,motion,respiratory gating,data-driven gating,imaging
                Radiology & Imaging
                pet/ct, motion, respiratory gating, data-driven gating, imaging

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content128

                Cited by18

                Most referenced authors189