5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Management of Spasticity After Traumatic Brain Injury in Children

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Traumatic brain injury is a common cause of disability worldwide. In fact, trauma is the second most common cause of death and disability, still today. Traumatic brain injury affects nearly 475 000 children in the United States alone. Globally it is estimated that nearly 2 million people are affected by traumatic brain injuries every year. The mechanism of injury differs between countries in the developing world, where low velocity injuries and interpersonal violence dominates, and high-income countries where high velocity injuries are more common. Traumatic brain injury is not only associated with acute problems, but patients can suffer from longstanding consequences such as seizures, spasticity, cognitive and social issues, often long after the acute injury has resolved. Spasticity is common after traumatic brain injury in children and up to 38% of patients may develop spasticity in the first 12 months after cerebral injury from stroke or trauma. Management of spasticity in children after traumatic brain injury is often overlooked as there are more pressing issues to attend to in the early phase after injury. By the time the spasticity becomes a priority, often it is too late to make meaningful improvements without reverting to major corrective surgical techniques. There is also very little written on the topic of spasticity management after traumatic brain injury, especially in children. Most of the information we have is derived from stroke research. The focus of management strategies are largely medication use, physical therapy, and other physical rehabilitative strategies, with surgical management techniques used for long-term refractory cases only. With this manuscript, the authors aim to review our current understanding of the pathophysiology and management options, as well as prevention, of spasticity after traumatic brain injury in children.

          Related collections

          Most cited references62

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The control of muscle tone, reflexes, and movement: Robert Wartenbeg Lecture

          J LANCE (1980)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Occurence and clinical predictors of spasticity after ischemic stroke.

            There is currently no consensus on (1) the percentage of patients who develop spasticity after ischemic stroke, (2) the relation between spasticity and initial clinical findings after acute stroke, and (3) the impact of spasticity on activities of daily living and health-related quality of life. In a prospective cohort study, 301 consecutive patients with clinical signs of central paresis due to a first-ever ischemic stroke were examined in the acute stage and 6 months later. At both times, the degree and pattern of paresis and muscle tone, the Barthel Index, and the EQ-5D score, a standardized instrument of health-related quality of life, were evaluated. Spasticity was assessed on the Modified Ashworth Scale and defined as Modified Ashworth Scale >1 in any of the examined joints. Two hundred eleven patients (70.1%) were reassessed after 6 months. Of these, 42.6% (n=90) had developed spasticity. A more severe degree of spasticity (Modified Ashworth Scale >or=3) was observed in 15.6% of all patients. The prevalence of spasticity did not differ between upper and lower limbs, but in the upper limb muscles, higher degrees of spasticity (Modified Ashworth Scale >or=3) were more frequently (18.9%) observed than in the lower limbs (5.5%). Regression analysis used to test the differences between upper and lower limbs showed that patients with more severe paresis in the proximal and distal limb muscles had a higher risk for developing spasticity (P
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Prevalence of spasticity post stroke.

              To establish the prevalence of spasticity 12 months after stroke and examine its relationship with functional ability. A cohort study of prevalence of spasticity at 12 months post stroke. Initially hospitalized but subsequently community-dwelling stroke survivors in Liverpool, UK. One hundred and six consecutively presenting stroke patients surviving to 12 months. Muscle tone measured at the elbow using the Modified Ashworth Scale and at several joints, in the arms and legs, using the Tone Assessment Scale; functional ability using the modified Barthel Index. Increased muscle tone (spasticity) was present in 29 (27%) and 38 (36%) of the 106 patients when measured using the Modified Ashworth Scale and Tone Assessment Scale respectively. Combining the results from both scales produced a prevalence of 40 (38%). Those with spasticity had significantly lower Barthel scores at 12 months (p < 0.0001). When estimating the prevalence of spasticity it is essential to assess both arms and legs, using both scales. Despite measuring tone at several joints, spasticity was demonstrated in only 40 (38%) patients, lower than previous estimates.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Neurol
                Front Neurol
                Front. Neurol.
                Frontiers in Neurology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-2295
                21 February 2020
                2020
                : 11
                : 126
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Paediatric Neurosurgery Unit, Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital , Cape Town, South Africa
                [2] 2Division of Neurosurgery, University of Cape Town , Cape Town, South Africa
                [3] 3Neuroscience Institute, University of Cape Town , Cape Town, South Africa
                Author notes

                Edited by: Adel Helmy, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom

                Reviewed by: Ahmed Negida, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Egypt; AUlrika Sandvik, Karolinska Institutet (KI), Sweden

                *Correspondence: Johannes M. N. Enslin johannes.enslin@ 123456uct.ac.za

                This article was submitted to Neurotrauma, a section of the journal Frontiers in Neurology

                Article
                10.3389/fneur.2020.00126
                7047214
                4becc4d8-c602-4751-9002-9bc4f4a45306
                Copyright © 2020 Enslin, Rohlwink and Figaji.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 26 August 2019
                : 04 February 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 3, Equations: 0, References: 68, Pages: 13, Words: 10900
                Categories
                Neurology
                Review

                Neurology
                traumatic brain injury,spasticity,management,rehabilitation,children
                Neurology
                traumatic brain injury, spasticity, management, rehabilitation, children

                Comments

                Comment on this article