2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Nomogram predicting early urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          One of the most frequent side effects of radical prostatectomy (RP) is urinary incontinence. The primary cause of urine incontinence is usually thought to be impaired urethral sphincter function; nevertheless, the pathophysiology and recovery process of urine incontinence remains unclear. This study aimed to identify potential risk variables, build a risk prediction tool that considers preoperative urodynamic findings, and direct doctors to take necessary action to reduce the likelihood of developing early urinary incontinence.

          Methods

          We retrospectively screened patients who underwent radical prostatectomy between January 1, 2020 and December 31, 2023 at the First People ‘s Hospital of Nantong, China. According to nomogram results, patients who developed incontinence within three months were classified as having early incontinence. The training group’s general characteristics were first screened using univariate logistic analysis, and the LASSO method was applied for the best prediction. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was carried out to determine independent risk factors for early postoperative urine incontinence in the training group and to create nomograms that predict the likelihood of developing early urinary incontinence. The model was internally validated by computing the performance of the validation cohort. The nomogram discrimination, correction, and clinical usefulness were assessed using the c-index, receiver operating characteristic curve, correction plot, and clinical decision curve.

          Results

          The study involved 142 patients in all. Multivariate logistic regression analysis following RP found seven independent risk variables for early urinary incontinence. A nomogram was constructed based on these independent risk factors. The training and validation groups’ c-indices showed that the model had high accuracy and stability. The calibration curve demonstrates that the corrective effect of the training and verification groups is perfect, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve indicates great identification capacity. Using a nomogram, the clinical net benefit was maximised within a probability threshold of 0.01–1, according to decision curve analysis (DCA).

          Conclusion

          The nomogram model created in this study can offer a clear, personalised analysis of the risk of early urine incontinence following RP. It is highly discriminatory and accurate, and it can help create efficient preventative measures and identify high-risk populations.

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-024-12850-1.

          Related collections

          Most cited references34

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Decision curve analysis: a novel method for evaluating prediction models.

          Diagnostic and prognostic models are typically evaluated with measures of accuracy that do not address clinical consequences. Decision-analytic techniques allow assessment of clinical outcomes but often require collection of additional information and may be cumbersome to apply to models that yield a continuous result. The authors sought a method for evaluating and comparing prediction models that incorporates clinical consequences,requires only the data set on which the models are tested,and can be applied to models that have either continuous or dichotomous results. The authors describe decision curve analysis, a simple, novel method of evaluating predictive models. They start by assuming that the threshold probability of a disease or event at which a patient would opt for treatment is informative of how the patient weighs the relative harms of a false-positive and a false-negative prediction. This theoretical relationship is then used to derive the net benefit of the model across different threshold probabilities. Plotting net benefit against threshold probability yields the "decision curve." The authors apply the method to models for the prediction of seminal vesicle invasion in prostate cancer patients. Decision curve analysis identified the range of threshold probabilities in which a model was of value, the magnitude of benefit, and which of several models was optimal. Decision curve analysis is a suitable method for evaluating alternative diagnostic and prognostic strategies that has advantages over other commonly used measures and techniques.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Extensions to decision curve analysis, a novel method for evaluating diagnostic tests, prediction models and molecular markers

              Background Decision curve analysis is a novel method for evaluating diagnostic tests, prediction models and molecular markers. It combines the mathematical simplicity of accuracy measures, such as sensitivity and specificity, with the clinical applicability of decision analytic approaches. Most critically, decision curve analysis can be applied directly to a data set, and does not require the sort of external data on costs, benefits and preferences typically required by traditional decision analytic techniques. Methods In this paper we present several extensions to decision curve analysis including correction for overfit, confidence intervals, application to censored data (including competing risk) and calculation of decision curves directly from predicted probabilities. All of these extensions are based on straightforward methods that have previously been described in the literature for application to analogous statistical techniques. Results Simulation studies showed that repeated 10-fold crossvalidation provided the best method for correcting a decision curve for overfit. The method for applying decision curves to censored data had little bias and coverage was excellent; for competing risk, decision curves were appropriately affected by the incidence of the competing risk and the association between the competing risk and the predictor of interest. Calculation of decision curves directly from predicted probabilities led to a smoothing of the decision curve. Conclusion Decision curve analysis can be easily extended to many of the applications common to performance measures for prediction models. Software to implement decision curve analysis is provided.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                ntzb2008@163.com
                23167956@qq.com
                Journal
                BMC Cancer
                BMC Cancer
                BMC Cancer
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2407
                3 September 2024
                3 September 2024
                2024
                : 24
                : 1095
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.260483.b, ISNI 0000 0000 9530 8833, Department of Urology, , Affiliated Hospital 2 of Nantong University, ; Nantong, China
                [2 ]GRID grid.260483.b, ISNI 0000 0000 9530 8833, Medical Research Center, , Affiliated Hospital 2 of Nantong University, ; Nantong, China
                [3 ]Jiangsu Nantong Urological Clinical Medical Center, Nantong, China
                Article
                12850
                10.1186/s12885-024-12850-1
                11373233
                39227825
                4b87da33-a067-4eed-9b7e-7aaf5b1da23d
                © The Author(s) 2024

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

                History
                : 6 June 2024
                : 26 August 2024
                Funding
                Funded by: the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu
                Award ID: BE2017682
                Funded by: Jiangsu Health Commission
                Award ID: Z2022014
                Award ID: Z2022014
                Funded by: Medical Research Project of Nantong Health Commission
                Award ID: MS2022017)
                Funded by: Nantong Science and Technology Bureau
                Award ID: MS22019009
                Funded by: Youth Project of Health Commission of Nantong City
                Award ID: QN2022017
                Funded by: Basic Research and Social Minsheng Plan Project
                Award ID: JC12022008
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2024

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                prostate cancer,radical prostatectomy (rp),urinary incontinence,urethral pressure profile

                Comments

                Comment on this article