Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
27
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The role of social partners in the governance of dual vocational education and training system: The Portuguese case Translated title: O papel dos parceiros sociais na governança do sistema de educação e formação vocacional dual: O caso português

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Abstract Portugal has been referred as one example of lower levels of integration of social partners in the governance of education and training systems (Sanz de Miguel, 2017). There is lack of research about the effectiveness of the governance of the only program close to the Dual VET concept: the Apprenticeship system. A pilot project of Dual VET ran from 2012 and terminated in 2016 without substantial evaluation. The objective of this paper is to provide an overview of the role social partners have in the governance of the existing Portuguese Apprenticeship system. We carried out extensive review of the scientific and grey literature about Dual VET for youngsters in Portugal, as well as database queries to official statistical sources. Our research reveals a complex formal role: The employment agency IEFP provides funding for Apprenticeship and negotiates with the main social partners the allocation of the Single Social Tax for its regional centres. Indirectly, many social partners are formally involved in the general VET governance participating in various coordination and monitoring structures of the National System of Qualifications and other regulatory agencies (IEFP and ANQEP). In this article we also discuss possible causes for the failure of the pilot Dual VET, which took effect within the scope of a curricular review of the primary and secondary education.

          Translated abstract

          Resumo Portugal tem sido referido como um exemplo de níveis mais baixos de integração dos parceiros sociais na governação dos sistemas de educação e formação (Sanz de Miguel, 2017). Faltam pesquisas sobre a eficácia da governança do único programa próximo ao conceito de Educação e Formação Dual: o sistema de Aprendizagem. Um piloto de Educação e Formação Dual inspirado no modelo alemão começou em 2012 e foi encerrado em 2016 sem que tivesse ocorrido uma avaliação substancial ao programa. O objetivo deste documento é fornecer uma visão geral do papel que os parceiros sociais têm na governação do atual sistema de educação e formação dual português. Procedeu-se a uma extensa revisão da literatura científica e cinzenta sobre o sistema dual em Portugal, direcionado para jovens bem como a consultas a bases de dados de fontes estatísticas oficiais. A nossa pesquisa revela um papel formal complexo: A agência de emprego IEFP financia a Aprendizagem e negocia com os principais parceiros sociais a atribuição da Taxa Social Única aos seus centros regionais. Indiretamente, muitos parceiros sociais estão formalmente envolvidos na governança geral do sistema de educação e formação, participando de várias estruturas de coordenação e monitoramento do Sistema Nacional de Qualificações e outras agências reguladoras (IEFP e ANQEP). Neste artigo discutimos também as possíveis causas do insucesso do programa piloto de educação e formação dual em Portugal, que se concretizou no âmbito de uma revisão curricular do ensino básico e secundário.

          Related collections

          Most cited references40

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals: secrets of the trade.

          To describe and discuss the process used to write a narrative review of the literature for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. Publication of narrative overviews of the literature should be standardized to increase their objectivity. In the past decade numerous changes in research methodology pertaining to reviews of the literature have occurred. These changes necessitate authors of review articles to be familiar with current standards in the publication process. Narrative overview of the literature synthesizing the findings of literature retrieved from searches of computerized databases, hand searches, and authoritative texts. An overview of the use of three types of reviews of the literature is presented. Step by step instructions for how to conduct and write a narrative overview utilizing a 'best-evidence synthesis' approach are discussed, starting with appropriate preparatory work and ending with how to create proper illustrations. Several resources for creating reviews of the literature are presented and a narrative overview critical appraisal worksheet is included. A bibliography of other useful reading is presented in an appendix. Narrative overviews can be a valuable contribution to the literature if prepared properly. New and experienced authors wishing to write a narrative overview should find this article useful in constructing such a paper and carrying out the research process. It is hoped that this article will stimulate scholarly dialog amongst colleagues about this research design and other complex literature review methods.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Undertaking a literature review: a step by step approach

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Dual training in Europe: a policy fad or a policy turn?

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                fs
                Forum Sociológico
                Forum Sociológico
                CICS.NOVA - Centro Interdisciplinar de Ciências Sociais (Lisboa, , Portugal )
                0872-8380
                2182-7427
                December 2021
                : 39
                : 67-79
                Affiliations
                [1] Lisboa orgnameUniversidade Nova de Lisboa orgdiv1Faculdade de Ciências Sociais e Humanas orgdiv2CICS.NOVA Portugal
                [2] Caparica orgnameUniversidade Nova de Lisboa orgdiv1Nova School of Sciences and Technology Portugal
                Article
                S0872-83802021000200067 S0872-8380(21)00003900067
                10.4000/sociologico.10317
                4b758377-9879-4d1d-95dc-2ee9552ebfe2

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

                History
                : 10 February 2021
                : 25 October 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 41, Pages: 13
                Product

                SciELO Portugal


                aprendizagem,governança,parceiros sociais,dual VET,apprenticeship,governance,social partners,educação e formação dual

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content249