4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Natural killer cell‐mediated ADCC in SARS‐CoV‐2‐infected individuals and vaccine recipients

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          COVID‐19, caused by SARS‐CoV‐2, has emerged as a global pandemic. While immune responses of the adaptive immune system have been in the focus of research, the role of NK cells in COVID‐19 remains less well understood. Here, we characterized NK cell‐mediated SARS‐CoV‐2 antibody‐dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) against SARS‐CoV‐2 spike‐1 (S1) and nucleocapsid (NC) protein. Serum samples from SARS‐CoV‐2 resolvers induced significant CD107a‐expression by NK cells in response to S1 and NC, while serum samples from SARS‐CoV‐2‐negative individuals did not. Furthermore, serum samples from individuals that received the BNT162b2 vaccine induced strong CD107a expression by NK cells that increased with the second vaccination and was significantly higher than observed in infected individuals. As expected, vaccine‐induced responses were only directed against S1 and not against NC protein. S1‐specific CD107a responses by NK cells were significantly correlated to NK cell‐mediated killing of S1‐expressing cells. Interestingly, screening of serum samples collected prior to the COVID‐19 pandemic identified two individuals with cross‐reactive antibodies against SARS‐CoV‐2 S1, which also induced degranulation of NK cells. Taken together, these data demonstrate that antibodies induced by SARS‐CoV‐2 infection and anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccines can trigger significant NK cell‐mediated ADCC activity, and identify some cross‐reactive ADCC‐activity against SARS‐CoV‐2 by endemic coronavirus‐specific antibodies.

          Abstract

          Antibodies induced by SARS‐CoV‐2 infection or vaccination mediate NK cell activation, resulting in the release of cytotoxic granules, referred to as ADCC. Highest levels of ADCC were observed when using plasma from BNT162b2‐vaccinated individuals. (Created with BioRender.com)

          Related collections

          Most cited references41

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Targets of T cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus in humans with COVID-19 disease and unexposed individuals

          Summary Understanding adaptive immunity to SARS-CoV-2 is important for vaccine development, interpreting coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pathogenesis, and calibration of pandemic control measures. Using HLA class I and II predicted peptide ‘megapools’, circulating SARS-CoV-2−specific CD8+ and CD4+ T cells were identified in ∼70% and 100% of COVID-19 convalescent patients, respectively. CD4+ T cell responses to spike, the main target of most vaccine efforts, were robust and correlated with the magnitude of the anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgA titers. The M, spike and N proteins each accounted for 11-27% of the total CD4+ response, with additional responses commonly targeting nsp3, nsp4, ORF3a and ORF8, among others. For CD8+ T cells, spike and M were recognized, with at least eight SARS-CoV-2 ORFs targeted. Importantly, we detected SARS-CoV-2−reactive CD4+ T cells in ∼40-60% of unexposed individuals, suggesting cross-reactive T cell recognition between circulating ‘common cold’ coronaviruses and SARS-CoV-2.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Safety and Immunogenicity of Two RNA-Based Covid-19 Vaccine Candidates

            Abstract Background Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections and the resulting disease, coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19), have spread to millions of persons worldwide. Multiple vaccine candidates are under development, but no vaccine is currently available. Interim safety and immunogenicity data about the vaccine candidate BNT162b1 in younger adults have been reported previously from trials in Germany and the United States. Methods In an ongoing, placebo-controlled, observer-blinded, dose-escalation, phase 1 trial conducted in the United States, we randomly assigned healthy adults 18 to 55 years of age and those 65 to 85 years of age to receive either placebo or one of two lipid nanoparticle–formulated, nucleoside-modified RNA vaccine candidates: BNT162b1, which encodes a secreted trimerized SARS-CoV-2 receptor–binding domain; or BNT162b2, which encodes a membrane-anchored SARS-CoV-2 full-length spike, stabilized in the prefusion conformation. The primary outcome was safety (e.g., local and systemic reactions and adverse events); immunogenicity was a secondary outcome. Trial groups were defined according to vaccine candidate, age of the participants, and vaccine dose level (10 μg, 20 μg, 30 μg, and 100 μg). In all groups but one, participants received two doses, with a 21-day interval between doses; in one group (100 μg of BNT162b1), participants received one dose. Results A total of 195 participants underwent randomization. In each of 13 groups of 15 participants, 12 participants received vaccine and 3 received placebo. BNT162b2 was associated with a lower incidence and severity of systemic reactions than BNT162b1, particularly in older adults. In both younger and older adults, the two vaccine candidates elicited similar dose-dependent SARS-CoV-2–neutralizing geometric mean titers, which were similar to or higher than the geometric mean titer of a panel of SARS-CoV-2 convalescent serum samples. Conclusions The safety and immunogenicity data from this U.S. phase 1 trial of two vaccine candidates in younger and older adults, added to earlier interim safety and immunogenicity data regarding BNT162b1 in younger adults from trials in Germany and the United States, support the selection of BNT162b2 for advancement to a pivotal phase 2–3 safety and efficacy evaluation. (Funded by BioNTech and Pfizer; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04368728.)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              COVID-19 vaccine BNT162b1 elicits human antibody and TH1 T-cell responses

              An effective vaccine is needed to halt the spread of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic. Recently, we reported safety, tolerability and antibody response data from an ongoing placebo-controlled, observer-blinded phase I/II coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine trial with BNT162b1, a lipid nanoparticle-formulated nucleoside-modified mRNA that encodes the receptor binding domain (RBD) of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein1. Here we present antibody and T cell responses after vaccination with BNT162b1 from a second, non-randomized open-label phase I/II trial in healthy adults, 18-55 years of age. Two doses of 1-50 μg of BNT162b1 elicited robust CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses and strong antibody responses, with RBD-binding IgG concentrations clearly above those seen in serum from a cohort of individuals who had recovered from COVID-19. Geometric mean titres of SARS-CoV-2 serum-neutralizing antibodies on day 43 were 0.7-fold (1-μg dose) to 3.5-fold (50-μg dose) those of the recovered individuals. Immune sera broadly neutralized pseudoviruses with diverse SARS-CoV-2 spike variants. Most participants had T helper type 1 (TH1)-skewed T cell immune responses with RBD-specific CD8+ and CD4+ T cell expansion. Interferon-γ was produced by a large fraction of RBD-specific CD8+ and CD4+ T cells. The robust RBD-specific antibody, T cell and favourable cytokine responses induced by the BNT162b1 mRNA vaccine suggest that it has the potential to protect against COVID-19 through multiple beneficial mechanisms.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                marcus.altfeld@leibniz-hpi.de
                Journal
                Eur J Immunol
                Eur J Immunol
                10.1002/(ISSN)1521-4141
                EJI
                European Journal of Immunology
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                0014-2980
                1521-4141
                22 April 2022
                22 April 2022
                : 10.1002/eji.202149470
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Virus Immunology Leibniz Institute for Experimental Virology Hamburg Germany
                [ 2 ] Research Department Cell and Gene Therapy Department of Stem Cell Transplantation University Medical Center Hamburg‐Eppendorf Hamburg Germany
                [ 3 ] Institute of Immunology University Medical Center Hamburg‐Eppendorf Hamburg Germany
                [ 4 ] III. Department of Medicine University Medical Center Hamburg‐Eppendorf Hamburg Germany
                [ 5 ] German Center for Infection Disease (DZIF) Partner Site Hamburg‐Lübeck‐Borstel‐Riems Hamburg Germany
                [ 6 ] Center for Diagnostics Institute of Medical Microbiology Virology and Hygiene University Medical Center Hamburg‐Eppendorf Hamburg Germany
                [ 7 ] Institute of Legal Medicine University Medical Center Hamburg‐Eppendorf Hamburg Germany
                [ 8 ] Institute for Transfusion Medicine University Medical Center Hamburg‐Eppendorf Hamburg Germany
                [ 9 ] Division of Infectious Diseases I. Department of Internal Medicine University Medical Center Hamburg‐Eppendorf Hamburg Germany
                [ 10 ] Department for Clinical Immunology of Infectious Diseases Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine Hamburg Germany
                Author notes
                [*] [* ]Marcus Altfeld, Department of Virus Immunology, Leibniz Institute for Experimental Virology, Hamburg, 20251, Germany

                e‐mail: marcus.altfeld@ 123456leibniz-hpi.de

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7408-1419
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9050-6766
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5113-9529
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9780-7211
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1730-6674
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2922-4863
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9468-7944
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5972-2997
                Article
                EJI5275
                10.1002/eji.202149470
                9087393
                35416291
                4b68ec52-47a5-49a3-aaac-6fd11ac8cc0c
                © 2022 The Authors. European Journal of Immunology published by Wiley‐VCH GmbH

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

                History
                : 11 April 2022
                : 22 June 2021
                : 11 April 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 1, Pages: 11, Words: 6449
                Categories
                Research Article|Clinical
                Immunity to infection
                Research Articles
                Clinical
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                corrected-proof
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.1.5 mode:remove_FC converted:10.05.2022

                Immunology
                adcc,covid‐19,innate immunity,nk cells,vaccine
                Immunology
                adcc, covid‐19, innate immunity, nk cells, vaccine

                Comments

                Comment on this article