2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Editorial: Plasmodesmata: Recent Progress and New Insights

      editorial

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In this Frontiers Research Topic, readers will find a collection of research articles, mini-reviews, and opinion papers that focus on new findings and progress regarding plasmodesmata in the context of plant development and plant-pathogen interactions. Specifically, several reports present findings related to the targeted trafficking of endogenous and pathogen-derived proteins to or through plasmodesmata, or the role and regulation of plasmodesmata in defining symplasmic domains. The collection also includes articles that review progress with respect to cytoskeletal connections to basic plasmodesmal function or to interspecific plasmodesmata formed between hosts and their parasitic plants, or share perspectives on how plasmodesmal research may be relevant to addressing critical issues in producing resilient crops in the face of imminent challenges associated with climate change. In higher plants, virtually all sister cells are connected to each other via the primary plasmodesmata formed at the division wall during cell division. However, as cells grow and differentiate, those plasmodesmata can undergo temporary closing or various structural modifications such as those that lead to the formation of secondary/modified plasmodesmata or to disconnection by severing or complete disintegration. These events sometimes lead to the symplasmic isolation of cells. Voitsekhovskaja et al. investigate how secondary plasmodesmata may differentially form depending on how they load sugar into the phloem, i.e., using an apoplastic or symplastic path. This study reveals that secondary plasmodesmata formation is enhanced in symplastic loaders, particularly at the cell walls joining epidermal cells and epidermal with mesophyll cells. In addition, comparative analysis of carbohydrate composition suggests that secondary plasmodesmata formed between the two cell layers are likely used to traffic photosynthetic assimilates. Collectively, these findings raise the intriguing possibility that the epidermis and mesophyll could together comprise a symplastic domain in symplastic loaders. Godel-Jedrychowska et al. investigate how symplamic domains are formed in zygotic and somatic embryos during their development. Their study suggests that although the symplasmic domains form similarly in both types of embryos, there are a few qualitative differences such as the timing of establishing domain boundaries and the size of molecules that can move between cells. Krause group addresses the functional specialization of secondary plasmodesmata (Fischer et al.), examining what is known about interspecific plasmodesmata formed between parasitic plants and their plant hosts and provides cogent arguments for the value of parasitic plant-host systems in investigating various aspects of plasmodesmal formation and structure, and the establishment of symplastic domains. Two reports describe findings about plasmodesmata in the context of plant development, one related to the role of cytokinin in plasmodesmal function and the other to transcription factor movement critical for xylem development. Various reports have shown that plant hormones, such as auxin, abscisic acid, gibberellin, and salicylic acid, regulate plasmodesmal status, and/or vice versa. Adding to the list of hormones linked to plasmodesmal function, Horner and Brunkard show that direct application of a cytokinin, trans-Zeatin, or virus-induced gene silencing of the components of the cytokinin signaling pathway both bring about changes in plasmodesmal permeability. The transcription factor AT-HOOK MOTIF NUCLEAR LOCALIZED PROTEIN(AHL)4 is a mobile member of a large protein family, which is necessary for the proper xylem differentiation in Arabidopsis. Using domain swapping between AHL4 and a non-mobile member, AHL1, followed by genetic analyses, Seo and Lee now show that a specific C-terminal domain in AHL4 determines the mobility of the protein, and that AHL4 mobility from the stele to the endodermis and xylem precursor cells is vital for xylem development. Chritiaan van der Schoot and his team examine the relationship between lipid bodies and plasmodesmata in the shoot apical meristem in hybrid aspen and analyze the proteins associated with lipid bodies in dormant buds (Veerabagu et al.). Their findings indicate how lipid bodies may function as a putative delivery system for plasmodesmal proteins along the actin cytoskeleton to plasmodesmata. A mini review summarizes the association of actin with plasmodesmata (Diao and Huang) focusing on class I formins, actin-binding proteins involved in actin polymerization. Several class I formins localize to plasmodesmata including AtFH1 and AtFH2, which are required to maintain plasmodesmal permeability. Reflecting recent interest in the role of plasmodesmata as the battleground against microbial intruders, more proteins encoded by various microbial pathogens are identified to target plasmodesmata. Kyaw Aung's team presents evidence showing that bacterial effector proteins can traffic between cells (Li et al.), adding to the previous findings from fungal and oomycete systems (Cheval and Faulkner, 2018; Iswanto et al., 2021). They show that the effector movement is restricted by accumulation of callose at plasmodesmata and that an effector targeted to the plasma membrane is more efficiently able to move between cells than a mutant version that does not associate with the plasma membrane. How plasma membrane association may facilitate the protein's intercellular movement and how broadly this putative mechanism may apply are interesting questions for future investigations. In addition, it would not be surprising if beneficial bacteria also deploy effectors to bring about potential non-cell-autonomous effects. Notably, three research groups review and discuss potential applications of plasmodesmal research to improve crop health and yield. As the effects of global climate change become more pronounced in the coming years, there is no doubt that a variety of biotechnological approaches will be needed to enhance crop adaption. Along this line, Liu et al. succinctly summarize a large body of research on the ways pathogens may manipulate plasmodesmata to facilitate infection and how plants can deploy plasmodesmata-centered defenses to limit infection. Possible strategies of engineering plasmodesmata to enhance defense responses, for example by targeting callose metabolizing enzymes are also discussed. Iswanto et al. discuss plasmodesmal proteins involved in abiotic stress and in host-pathogen interactions as potential targets for gene editing using CRISPR/CAS9 technologies. The urgency to consider the importance of plasmodesmata research for crop improvement is furthermore underscored in the Perspective article from the Heinlein lab (Amari et al.). It highlights the potential impact of global warming on virus propagation in infected plants and agricultural productivity and collates work spanning decades that clearly indicates the increased susceptibility of plants to viral cell-to-cell movement at higher temperatures. Perhaps, the regulation of plasmodesmata may hold a promise as a new target for crop engineering and the time may be ripe for that exploration. Author Contributions TB-S wrote the first draft of the editorial. J-YL revised the draft and added additional sections, and MH edited. All authors contributed to the conception and solicitation of this Research Topic. Funding This work was partially supported with funding provided by the National Science Foundation (MCB1820103 to J-YL and MCB 1846245 to TB-S) and the Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-21-SUSC-0003-01 to MH). Conflict of Interest The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. Publisher's Note All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

          Related collections

          Most cited references2

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Plasmodesmal regulation during plant-pathogen interactions.

          Contents Summary 62 I. Introduction 62 II. Plasmodesmal regulation is an innate defence response 63 III. Reactive oxygen species regulate plasmodesmal function 63 IV. Plasmodesmal regulation by and of defence-associated small molecules 64 V. Plasmodesmata facilitate systemic defence signalling 64 VI. Virulent pathogens exploit plasmodesmata 66 VII. Outlook 66 Acknowledgements 66 References 66 SUMMARY: Plasmodesmata (PD) are plasma membrane-lined pores that connect neighbouring plant cells, bridging the cell wall and establishing cytoplasmic and membrane continuity between cells. PD are dynamic structures regulated by callose deposition in a variety of stress and developmental contexts. This process crudely controls the aperture of the pore and thus the flux of molecules between cells. During pathogen infection, plant cells initiate a range of immune responses and it was recently identified that, following perception of fungal and bacterial pathogens, plant cells initially close their PD. Systemic defence responses depend on the spread of signals between cells, raising questions about whether PD are in different functional states during different immune responses. It is well established that viral pathogens exploit PD to spread between cells, but it has more recently been identified that protein effectors secreted by fungal pathogens can spread between host cells via PD. It is possible that many classes of pathogens specifically target PD to aid infection, which would infer antagonistic regulation of PD by host and pathogen. How PD regulation benefits both host immune responses and pathogen infection is an important question and demands that we examine the multicellular nature of plant-pathogen interactions.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Pathogen effectors: What do they do at plasmodesmata?

            Abstract Plants perceive an assortment of external cues during their life cycle, including abiotic and biotic stressors. Biotic stress from a variety of pathogens, including viruses, oomycetes, fungi, and bacteria, is considered to be a substantial factor hindering plant growth and development. To hijack the host cell's defence machinery, plant pathogens have evolved sophisticated attack strategies mediated by numerous effector proteins. Several studies have indicated that plasmodesmata (PD), symplasmic pores that facilitate cell‐to‐cell communication between a cell and neighbouring cells, are one of the targets of pathogen effectors. However, in contrast to plant‐pathogenic viruses, reports of fungal‐ and bacterial‐encoded effectors that localize to and exploit PD are limited. Surprisingly, a recent study of PD‐associated bacterial effectors has shown that a number of bacterial effectors undergo cell‐to‐cell movement via PD. Here we summarize and highlight recent advances in the study of PD‐associated fungal/oomycete/bacterial effectors. We also discuss how pathogen effectors interfere with host defence mechanisms in the context of PD regulation.
              Bookmark

              Author and article information

              Contributors
              Journal
              Front Plant Sci
              Front Plant Sci
              Front. Plant Sci.
              Frontiers in Plant Science
              Frontiers Media S.A.
              1664-462X
              24 March 2022
              2022
              : 13
              : 840821
              Affiliations
              [1] 1Donald Danforth Plant Science Center , St. Louis, MO, United States
              [2] 2Institut de Biologie Moléculaire des Plantes, CNRS, Université de Strasbourg , Strasbourg, France
              [3] 3Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Delaware Biotechnology Institute, University of Delaware , Newark, DE, United States
              Author notes

              Edited by: Sébastien Mongrand, CNRS - Université de Bordeaux, France

              Reviewed by: Patricia Zambryski, University of California, Berkeley, United States

              *Correspondence: Jung-Youn Lee jylee@ 123456udel.edu

              This article was submitted to Plant Cell Biology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science

              Article
              10.3389/fpls.2022.840821
              8987972
              4b15ba58-ff59-4ced-872d-0504347835bd
              Copyright © 2022 Burch-Smith, Heinlein and Lee.

              This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

              History
              : 21 December 2021
              : 28 February 2022
              Page count
              Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 2, Pages: 3, Words: 1539
              Categories
              Plant Science
              Editorial

              Plant science & Botany
              plasmodesmata,cell-to-cell movement,biotechnology,plant-pathogen interactions,symplasmic domains,cytoskeleton

              Comments

              Comment on this article