129
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The transrectus sheath preperitoneal mesh repair for inguinal hernia: technique, rationale, and results of the first 50 cases

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          Laparoscopic and endoscopic hernia repair popularized the preperitoneal mesh position due to promising results concerning less chronic pain. However, considerable proportions of severe adverse events, learning curves, or added costs have to be taken into account. Therefore, open preperitoneal mesh techniques may have more advantages. The open approach to the preperitoneal space (PPS) according to transrectus sheath preperitoneal (TREPP) mesh repair is through the sheath of the rectus abdominus muscle. This technique provides an excellent view of the PPS and facilitates elective or acute hernia reduction and mesh positioning under direct vision. In concordance with the promising transinguinal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair experiences in the literature, we investigated the feasibility of TREPP.

          Methods

          A rationale description of the surgical technique, available level of evidence for thoughts behind technical considerations. Furthermore, a descriptive report of the clinical outcomes of our pilot case series including 50 patients undergoing the TREPP mesh repair.

          Results

          A consecutive group of our first 50 patients were operated with the TREPP technique. No technical problems were experienced during the development of this technique. No conversions to Lichtenstein repair were necessary. No recurrences and no chronic pain after a mean follow-up of 2 years were notable findings.

          Conclusion

          This description of the technique shows that the TREPP mesh repair might be a promising method because of the complete preperitoneal view, the short learning curve, and the stay-away-from-the-nerves principle. The rationale of the TREPP repair is discussed in detail.

          Related collections

          Most cited references13

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Evidence at a glance: error matrix approach for overviewing available evidence

          Background Clinical evidence continues to expand and is increasingly difficult to overview. We aimed at conceptualizing a visual assessment tool, i.e., a matrix for overviewing studies and their data in order to assess the clinical evidence at a glance. Methods A four-step matrix was constructed using the three dimensions of systematic error, random error, and design error. Matrix step I ranks the identified studies according to the dimensions of systematic errors and random errors. Matrix step II orders the studies according to the design errors. Matrix step III assesses the three dimensions of errors in studies. Matrix step IV assesses the size and direction of the intervention effect. Results The application of this four-step matrix is illustrated with two examples: peri-operative beta-blockade initialized in relation to surgery versus placebo for major non-cardiac surgery, and antiarrhythmics for maintaining sinus rhythm after cardioversion of atrial fibrillation. When clinical evidence is deemed both internally and externally valid, the size of the intervention effect is to be assessed. Conclusion The error matrix provides an overview of the validity of the available evidence at a glance, and may assist in deciding which interventions to use in clinical practice.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Nerve management and chronic pain after open inguinal hernia repair: a prospective two phase study.

            This prospective cohort study involved 781 elective primary inguinal hernia operations performed on 736 patients at the Hernia Centre of Reinbek Hospital from April 2000 to April 2002. Small hernias were fixed by the Shouldice repair, and large defects by the Lichtenstein repair with conventional polypropylene mesh. Pain was assessed before the operation, on day 0, 1, 2, 7, 6 months and 5 years after the operation by the visual analogue scale (VAS). The follow-up was 90.1% after 6 months and 82.6% after 5 years. Chronic pain (CP) was assessed in relation to preoperative pain, nerve anatomy and intraoperative nerve management. The anatomy of the iliohypogastric nerve (IHN), ilioinguinal nerve (IIN), and genital branch of the genitofemoral nerve (GB) before and after surgery was recorded in every operation. The preoperative pain rate was 41.0%. The CP and sensory disorder rate after 6 months were 16.4% and 15.9, respectively. The only independent significant parameters for CP after 6 months were preoperative pain (P 3) after 5 years had had a Lichtenstein repair with IIN neurolysis. The CP population of preoperative pain free patients changed with time: 65% of the patients with CP after 6 months were pain free after 5 years, and 69% of the patients with CP after 5 years were asymptomatic after 6 months. Mesh contact with a nerve removed from its natural bed may cause chronic long-term pain. The combination of IIN neurolysis and the Lichtenstein repair should be avoided.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Chronic pain after laparoscopic and open mesh repair of groin hernia.

              The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of chronic pain or discomfort after laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) repair and open mesh repair of groin hernia, and to assess the impact of such pain on patients' physical activity. A postal questionnaire was sent to patients who had TEP or open mesh repair of groin hernia between January 1998 and December 1999. The patients were asked about any persistent pain or discomfort in relation to the groin hernia repair and whether this pain or discomfort restricted their ability to undertake physical or sporting activity. Of the 560 available patients 454 (81.1 per cent) replied. Laparoscopic TEP repair was performed in 240 patients (52.9 per cent) and open mesh repair in 214 (47.1 per cent). Of the 454 patients, 136 (30.0 per cent) reported chronic groin pain or discomfort, which was significantly more common after open repair than after laparoscopic repair (38.3 versus 22.5 per cent; P < 0.01). Chronic groin pain or discomfort restricted daily physical or sporting activity in 18.1 per cent of the patients. The patients who had open repair complained of significantly more restriction of daily physical activity than patients who underwent laparoscopic repair (walking, P < 0.05; lifting a bag of groceries, P < 0.01). Chronic pain or discomfort was reported by 30.0 per cent of patients after groin hernia repair and was significantly more common after open mesh repair than after laparoscopic TEP repair. It restricted physical or sporting activities in 18.1 per cent of the patients and significantly more so after open mesh repair.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                wl.akkersdijk@stjansdal.nl
                Journal
                Hernia
                Hernia
                Hernia
                Springer-Verlag (Paris )
                1265-4906
                1248-9204
                1 December 2011
                1 December 2011
                June 2012
                : 16
                : 3
                : 295-299
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Surgery, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
                [2 ]Department of Surgery, St. Jansdal Hospital, Wethouder Jansenlaan 90, 3844 DG Harderwijk, The Netherlands
                Article
                893
                10.1007/s10029-011-0893-y
                3360865
                22131008
                4ae3615b-85fd-493b-81c7-0af261eeb429
                © The Author(s) 2011
                History
                : 29 June 2011
                : 13 November 2011
                Categories
                Original Article
                Custom metadata
                © Springer-Verlag 2012

                Gastroenterology & Hepatology
                inguinal hernia,mesh,preperitoneal,open,repair,posterior
                Gastroenterology & Hepatology
                inguinal hernia, mesh, preperitoneal, open, repair, posterior

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content324

                Cited by12

                Most referenced authors89