19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A randomized, placebo‐controlled trial of cenicriviroc for treatment of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis with fibrosis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The aim of this study was to evaluate cenicriviroc (CVC), a dual antagonist of C—C chemokine receptor types 2 and 5, for treatment of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) with liver fibrosis (LF). A randomized, double‐blind, multinational phase 2b study enrolled subjects with NASH, a nonalcoholic fatty liver disease activity score (NAS) ≥4, and LF (stages 1‐3, NASH Clinical Research Network) at 81 clinical sites. Subjects (N = 289) were randomly assigned CVC 150 mg or placebo. Primary outcome was ≥2‐point improvement in NAS and no worsening of fibrosis at year 1. Key secondary outcomes were: resolution of steatohepatitis (SH) and no worsening of fibrosis; improvement in fibrosis by ≥1 stage and no worsening of SH. Biomarkers of inflammation and adverse events were assessed. Full study recruitment was achieved. The primary endpoint of NAS improvement in the intent‐to‐treat population and resolution of SH was achieved in a similar proportion of subjects on CVC (N = 145) and placebo (N = 144; 16% vs. 19%, P = 0.52 and 8% vs. 6%, P = 0.49, respectively). However, the fibrosis endpoint was met in significantly more subjects on CVC than placebo (20% vs. 10%; P = 0.02). Treatment benefits were greater in those with higher disease activity and fibrosis stage at baseline. Biomarkers of systemic inflammation were reduced with CVC. Safety and tolerability of CVC were comparable to placebo. Conclusion: After 1 year of CVC treatment, twice as many subjects achieved improvement in fibrosis and no worsening of SH compared with placebo. Given the urgent need to develop antifibrotic therapies in NASH, these findings warrant phase 3 evaluation. (H epatology 2018;67:1754‐1767).

          Related collections

          Most cited references7

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          A 48-week randomized phase 2b study evaluating cenicriviroc versus efavirenz in treatment-naive HIV-infected adults with C-C chemokine receptor type 5-tropic virus

          Objective: To compare the efficacy, safety, and anti-inflammatory effects of cenicriviroc (CVC), an oral, once-daily C-C chemokine receptor types 5 and 2 antagonist, with those of efavirenz (EFV) in treatment-naive, HIV-1-infected adults. Design: A 48-week, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy phase 2b trial at 43 institutions (USA and Puerto Rico). Methods: Study participants (HIV-1 RNA ≥1000 copies/ml, CD4+ cell count ≥200 cells/μl, C-C chemokine receptor type 5-tropic virus) were randomized 2 : 2 : 1 to CVC 100 mg (CVC100), CVC 200 mg (CVC200), or EFV 600 mg, each administered with emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate. Key end points were virologic success (HIV-1 RNA  0.05 versus EFV), and at week 48 in 68, 64, and 50%, respectively (all P > 0.05 versus EFV). Resistance mutations emerged in five and zero CVC and EFV-treated study participants, respectively. Virologic nonresponse and nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor resistance decreased when CVC minimum plasma concentration was at least 47.8 ng/ml. Treatment-related adverse events of at least grade 2 and discontinuations because of adverse events were less frequent in CVC-treated study participants. Total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol decreased with CVC, but increased with EFV. C-C chemokine ligand type 2 (CCL2) (aka monocyte chemotactic protein-1) increased in a dose-dependent manner, whereas soluble CD14 levels decreased with CVC. Conclusion: CVC showed efficacy and favorable safety in treatment-naive HIV-1-infected study participants, supporting selection of CVC200 for phase 3 studies. Trial registration: NCT01338883.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and CCR2/CCR5 Antagonist Activity of Cenicriviroc in Participants With Mild or Moderate Hepatic Impairment

            Cenicriviroc, a dual CCR2/CCR5 antagonist, is being evaluated for treatment of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and liver fibrosis (CENTAUR; NCT02217475). As it is metabolized by the liver, cenicriviroc was investigated in hepatic‐impaired participants for pharmacokinetic changes. Participants with mild‐to‐moderate hepatic impairment (HI) (Child–Pugh class A (N  =  7) or B (N = 8)) and matched controls (N = 15) received cenicriviroc 150 mg once daily for 14 days. Serial blood samples were obtained on Days 1 and 14. Safety, tolerability, and effects on CCR2/CCR5 ligands, cytokines, and bacterial translocation biomarkers were evaluated. Cenicriviroc exposures were increased by moderate HI (AUC0‐τ 55%, Cmax 29% higher) but were not with mild HI (AUC0‐τ 38%, Cmax 40% lower). Cenicriviroc was well tolerated. Rapid and potent CCR2/CCR5 blockade was observed, not associated with increases in hepatic inflammation or bacterial translocation biomarkers. Study findings suggest that cenicriviroc 150 mg can be used in patients with mild‐to‐moderate HI.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of TBR-652, a CCR5/CCR2 antagonist, in HIV-1-infected, treatment-experienced, CCR5 antagonist-naive subjects.

              To determine the antiviral activity, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, and tolerability of several dose levels of oral TBR-652 monotherapy in HIV-1-infected, antiretroviral experienced, CCR5 antagonist-naive subjects. Double-blind placebo-controlled study in the United States and Argentina. Subjects were randomized in a ratio of 4:1 per dose level to TBR-652 (25, 50, 75, 100, or 150 mg) or placebo, taken once daily for 10 days. Changes from baseline in HIV-1 RNA and CD4 cell counts were measured through day 40 and for monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), and IL-6 at day 10. Pharmacokinetic data were analyzed using noncompartmental statistics. Laboratory and clinical adverse events (AEs) and electrocardiogram changes were recorded. Maximum median reductions in HIV-1 RNA values for the 25, 50, 75, and 150 mg doses were -0.7, -1.6, -1.8, and -1.7 log10 copies per milliliter, respectively. All changes were significant. Median time to nadir was 10-11 days. Suppression persisted well into the posttreatment period. Mean MCP-1 increased significantly by day 10 in the 50-mg and 150-mg dose groups. Effects on CD4 cell counts, hs-CRP, and IL-6 levels were negligible. TBR-652 was generally safe and well tolerated, with no withdrawals due to AEs. TBR-652 caused significant reductions in HIV-1 RNA at all doses. Significant increases in MCP-1 levels suggested a strong CCR2 blockade. TBR-652 was generally well tolerated with no dose-limiting AEs. Pharmacodynamics indicate that TBR-652 warrants further investigation as an unboosted once-daily oral CCR5 antagonist with potentially important CCR2-mediated anti-inflammatory effects.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Scott.Friedman@mssm.edu
                Journal
                Hepatology
                Hepatology
                10.1002/(ISSN)1527-3350
                HEP
                Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.)
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                0270-9139
                1527-3350
                29 January 2018
                May 2018
                : 67
                : 5 ( doiID: 10.1002/hep.v67.5 )
                : 1754-1767
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Division of Liver Diseases Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Mount Sinai NY
                [ 2 ] Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital and Pierre and Marie Curie University Paris France
                [ 3 ] Pinnacle Clinical Research San Antonio TX
                [ 4 ] Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Department of Medicine Duke University Durham NC
                [ 5 ] Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) and Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Nottingham Nottingham UK
                [ 6 ] Liver Unit, Hospital Clinic, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS) Centro de Investigación en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd) Barcelona Spain
                [ 7 ] Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Antwerp University Hospital University of Antwerp Antwerp Belgium
                [ 8 ] Liver Research Group Australian National University Medical School at the Canberra Hospital Canberra Australian Capital Territory Australia
                [ 9 ] Liver Care Network Swedish Medical Center Seattle WA
                [ 10 ] Department of Gastroenterology, DiBiMIS University of Palermo Palermo Italy
                [ 11 ] Division of Infectious Diseases and Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry Wrocław Medical University Wrocław Poland
                [ 12 ] Department of Infectious Diseases J. Gromkowski Provincial Specialist Hospital in Wrocław Wrocław Poland
                [ 13 ] Allergan, Plc South San Francisco CA
                [ 14 ] Medpace, Inc. Cincinnati OH
                [ 15 ] Center for Liver Diseases Inova Fairfax Medical Campus Falls Church VA
                [ 16 ] Department of Medicine and Therapeutics The Chinese University of Hong Kong Hong Kong
                [ 17 ] Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine University of California at San Diego La Jolla CA
                [ 18 ] NAFLD Research Center, Department of Medicine University of California at San Diego La Jolla CA
                [ 19 ] Department of Medicine III University Hospital Aachen Aachen Germany
                [ 20 ] Department of Gastroenterology Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond VA
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] ADDRESS CORRESPONDENCE AND REPRINT REQUESTS TO:

                Scott L. Friedman, M.D.

                Division of Liver Diseases, Box 1123, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

                1425 Madison Avenue

                Room 11‐70c

                New York, NY 10029‐6574

                E‐mail: Scott.Friedman@ 123456mssm.edu

                Tel: +1‐212‐659‐9501

                [†]

                These authors contributed equally as first co‐authors.

                [‡]

                These authors contributed equally as senior co‐authors.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6206-0226
                Article
                HEP29477
                10.1002/hep.29477
                5947654
                28833331
                4ac593af-8d77-4874-b320-f36a31a42ac1
                © 2017 The Authors. H epatology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc., on behalf of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

                History
                : 13 April 2017
                : 19 July 2017
                : 13 August 2017
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 2, Pages: 14, Words: 5870
                Funding
                Funded by: Tobira Therapeutics
                Categories
                Original Article
                Original Articles
                Steatohepatitis/Metabolic Liver Disease
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                hep29477
                May 2018
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_NLMPMC version:version=5.3.8.2 mode:remove_FC converted:11.05.2018

                Gastroenterology & Hepatology
                Gastroenterology & Hepatology

                Comments

                Comment on this article