4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Processing and preservation technologies to enhance indigenous food sovereignty, nutrition security and health equity in North America

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Indigenous foods are carriers of traditional native North American food culture and living philosophy. They are featured by the wide varieties in fresh and processed forms, richness in nutrition, flavor, health benefits and diversity in origins, but are usually misunderstood or underrepresented in the modern food systems. Conventional processing and cooking methods are sometimes labor-intensive, less efficient and lack science-based guidelines to prevent unseen safety risks and food loss. Global and regional climate change have caused additional challenges to conventional cooking/processing, and increased native communities’ reliance on externally produced foods, which have resulted in increasing nutritional unbalance and prevalence of diet-related health issues. Current and emerging technologies, such as storage and packaging, drying, safety processing, canning, pickling, and fermentation, which treat foods under optimized conditions to improve the safety and extend the shelf-life, are increasingly used in current food systems. Therefore, exploring these technologies for indigenous foods offers opportunities to better preserve their nutrition, safety, and accessibility, and is critical for the sovereignty and independence of indigenous food systems, and sustainability of indigenous food culture. This mini-review focuses on identifying adoptable processing and preservation technologies for selected traditional indigenous foods in North America, summarizing education, extension, and outreach resources and discussing the current challenges and future needs critical to expanding knowledge about indigenous foods and improving food sovereignty, nutrition security, and health equity.

          Related collections

          Most cited references71

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Ultra-processed foods in human health: a critical appraisal

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Nutritional comparison of fresh, frozen and canned fruits and vegetables. Part 1. Vitamins C and B and phenolic compounds

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found
              Is Open Access

              Ultra-Processed Foods and Food System Sustainability: What Are the Links?

              Global food systems are no longer sustainable for health, the environment, animal biodiversity and wellbeing, culinary traditions, socioeconomics, or small farmers. The increasing massive consumption of animal foods has been identified as a major determinant of unsustainability. However, today, the consumption of ultra-processed foods (UPFs) is also questioned. The main objective of this review is therefore to check the validity of this new hypothesis. We first identified the main ingredients/additives present in UPFs and the agricultural practices involved in their provision to agro-industrials. Overall, UPF production is analysed regarding its impacts on the environment, biodiversity, animal wellbeing, and cultural and socio-economic dimensions. Our main conclusion is that UPFs are associated with intensive agriculture/livestock and threaten all dimensions of food system sustainability due to the combination of low-cost ingredients at purchase and increased consumption worldwide. However, low-animal-calorie UPFs do not produce the highest greenhouse gas emissions (GHGEs) compared to conventional meat and dairy products. In addition, only reducing energy dense UPF intake, without substitution, might substantially reduce GHGEs. Therefore, significant improvement in food system sustainability requires urgently encouraging limiting UPF consumption to the benefit of mildly processed foods, preferably seasonal, organic, and local products.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2195053/overviewRole: Role: Role: Role: Role: Role: Role:
                Role: Role: Role: Role: Role: Role: Role: Role: Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2631316/overviewRole: Role: Role: Role: Role: Role: Role: Role: Role: Role: Role: Role:
                Journal
                Front Nutr
                Front Nutr
                Front. Nutr.
                Frontiers in Nutrition
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2296-861X
                19 June 2024
                2024
                : 11
                : 1395962
                Affiliations
                Department of Food Science, Cornell AgriTech, Cornell University , Geneva, NY, United States
                Author notes

                Edited by: Yonathan Asikin, University of the Ryukyus, Japan

                Reviewed by: Wenqiang Guan, Tianjin University of Commerce, China

                *Correspondence: Chang Chen, cc2774@ 123456cornell.edu
                Olga I. Padilla-Zakour, oip1@ 123456cornell.edu
                Article
                10.3389/fnut.2024.1395962
                11221487
                38962432
                4a5858c6-bfbd-4d34-bef8-8d471aa33024
                Copyright © 2024 Heaney, Padilla-Zakour and Chen.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 04 March 2024
                : 07 June 2024
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 2, Equations: 0, References: 85, Pages: 8, Words: 6368
                Funding
                The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. The project is partially funding provided by USDA NIFA Multistate NC1023 project NYG-623810 under #7001076.
                Categories
                Nutrition
                Mini Review
                Custom metadata
                Food Chemistry

                indigenous food sovereignty,nutrition security,health equity,food processing,food safety,food quality

                Comments

                Comment on this article