0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      STEM service learning in higher education: A systematic literature review

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In recent years, the adoption of service learning (SL) as a pedagogical strategy has gained momentum in higher educational institutions. This study aims to provide a comprehensive literature review on implementing SL in higher education, specifically in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education. The review processes included the dataset from Scopus and Web of Science. The final study included 20 articles based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria that were predetermined earlier. The findings of the study reveal the acceptance and use of SL in STEM education. The study looks into the uniqueness of previous STEM education SL frameworks. The benefits of STEM education SL for students are also identified. Lastly, the study highlights emerging issues regarding integrating STEM education and SL. In conclusion, the study provides valuable insights into the implementation of SL in higher education, particularly in STEM fields, by examining frameworks, benefits, and emerging issues in integrating this pedagogical approach.

          Related collections

          Most cited references56

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration

            Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are essential to summarise evidence relating to efficacy and safety of healthcare interventions accurately and reliably. The clarity and transparency of these reports, however, are not optimal. Poor reporting of systematic reviews diminishes their value to clinicians, policy makers, and other users. Since the development of the QUOROM (quality of reporting of meta-analysis) statement—a reporting guideline published in 1999—there have been several conceptual, methodological, and practical advances regarding the conduct and reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Also, reviews of published systematic reviews have found that key information about these studies is often poorly reported. Realising these issues, an international group that included experienced authors and methodologists developed PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses) as an evolution of the original QUOROM guideline for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of evaluations of health care interventions. The PRISMA statement consists of a 27-item checklist and a four-phase flow diagram. The checklist includes items deemed essential for transparent reporting of a systematic review. In this explanation and elaboration document, we explain the meaning and rationale for each checklist item. For each item, we include an example of good reporting and, where possible, references to relevant empirical studies and methodological literature. The PRISMA statement, this document, and the associated website (www.prisma-statement.org/) should be helpful resources to improve reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education
                EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed
                Modestum Ltd
                1305-8215
                1305-8223
                2024
                December 11 2024
                : 20
                : 12
                : em2549
                Article
                10.29333/ejmste/15705
                4a36e34c-67b6-4dda-abc2-f55e6e8bb2ff
                © 2024
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content178

                Most referenced authors839