PERCEPÇÕES DE ENFERMEIROS DE UNIDADES BÁSICAS DE SAÚDE QUANTO A ATUAÇÃO FRENTE AOS CASOS DE DEPRESSÃO  <span class="so-article-trans-title" dir="auto"> Translated title: PERCEPCIONES DEL PERSONAL DE ENFERMERÍA DE LAS UNIDADES BÁSICAS DE SALUD SOBRE SU ACTUACIÓN EN CASOS DE DEPRESIÓN </span> <span class="so-article-trans-title" dir="auto"> Translated title: PERCEPTIONS OF NURSES IN BASIC HEALTH UNITS REGARDING THEIR ACTIONS IN CASES OF DEPRESSION </span>

There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

Abstract

RESUMO: Objetivo: compreender a atuação do profissional enfermeiro frente aos casos de depressão em unidades básicas de saúde. Método: pesquisa qualitativa, realizada no ano de 2020, por meio de entrevista aberta, com 15 enfermeiros atuantes em unidades básicas de saúde de um município da região Centro Oeste brasileira. As entrevistas foram submetidas à análise de conteúdo. Resultados: foi possível evidenciar que os enfermeiros possuem dificuldades multifatoriais para atender aos casos de depressão. Entretanto, apontam estratégias que indicam caminhos para qualificar sua prática clínica, como a importância da capacitação profissional e fortalecimento do trabalho em equipe, no intuito que estejam preparados e habilitados para oferecer uma assistência de enfermagem efetiva e humanizada às pessoas com depressão. Conclusão: mesmo diante dos desafios deflagrados, a continuidade das ações de enfermagem direcionadas aos pacientes com depressão e outros transtornos mentais é fundamental principalmente em contextos que possuem uma rede fragilizada no cuidado à saúde mental.

Translated abstract

RESUMEN Objetivo: conocer cómo abordan los enfermeros los casos de depresión en los centros de atención básica de salud. Método: Investigación cualitativa, realizada en 2020, mediante entrevista abierta a 15 enfermeros que trabajan en unidades básicas de salud de un municipio de la región Centro-Oeste de Brasil. Las entrevistas se sometieron a un análisis de contenido. Resultados: Quedó claro que los enfermeros tienen dificultades multifactoriales para tratar los casos de depresión. Sin embargo, señalan estrategias que indican vías para cualificar su práctica clínica, como la importancia de la formación profesional y el refuerzo del trabajo en equipo, para que estén preparadas y cualificadas para ofrecer cuidados de enfermería eficaces y humanizados a las personas con depresión. Conclusión: Incluso ante los retos surgidos, la continuidad de las acciones de enfermería dirigidas a los pacientes con depresión y otros trastornos mentales es fundamental, especialmente en contextos que cuentan con una red de atención a la salud mental debilitada.

Translated abstract

ABSTRACT Objective: To understand how nurses deal with depression in basic health units. Method: Qualitative research was carried out in 2020 through an open interview with 15 nurses working in basic health units in a municipality in the Brazilian Midwest region. The interviews were subjected to content analysis. Results: It was possible to see that nurses have multifactorial difficulties in dealing with cases of depression. However, they point out strategies that indicate ways to qualify their clinical practice, such as the importance of professional training and strengthening teamwork, so they are prepared and qualified to offer effective and humanized nursing care to people with depression. Conclusion: Even in the face of the challenges that have arisen, the continuity of nursing actions aimed at patients with depression and other mental disorders is fundamental, especially in contexts with a weakened mental health care network.

Related collections

Most cited references 18

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups.

A Tong, P SAINSBURY, J. Craig (2007)

Qualitative research explores complex phenomena encountered by clinicians, health care providers, policy makers and consumers. Although partial checklists are available, no consolidated reporting framework exists for any type of qualitative design. To develop a checklist for explicit and comprehensive reporting of qualitative studies (in depth interviews and focus groups). We performed a comprehensive search in Cochrane and Campbell Protocols, Medline, CINAHL, systematic reviews of qualitative studies, author or reviewer guidelines of major medical journals and reference lists of relevant publications for existing checklists used to assess qualitative studies. Seventy-six items from 22 checklists were compiled into a comprehensive list. All items were grouped into three domains: (i) research team and reflexivity, (ii) study design and (iii) data analysis and reporting. Duplicate items and those that were ambiguous, too broadly defined and impractical to assess were removed. Items most frequently included in the checklists related to sampling method, setting for data collection, method of data collection, respondent validation of findings, method of recording data, description of the derivation of themes and inclusion of supporting quotations. We grouped all items into three domains: (i) research team and reflexivity, (ii) study design and (iii) data analysis and reporting. The criteria included in COREQ, a 32-item checklist, can help researchers to report important aspects of the research team, study methods, context of the study, findings, analysis and interpretations.