8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Predictors of preprocedural direct oral anticoagulant levels in patients having an elective surgery or procedure

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Key Points

          • Older age, female sex, low weight, renal dysfunction, and shorter interruption are associated with risk of preprocedural DOAC levels.

          • Apixaban and rivaroxaban were more likely than dabigatran to be associated with residual preprocedural levels using the PAUSE protocol.

          Abstract

          The Perioperative Anticoagulation Use for Surgery Evaluation (PAUSE) study prospectively evaluated a prespecified periprocedural-interruption strategy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) among patients with atrial fibrillation. Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify clinical parameters associated with residual DOAC levels ≥30 ng/mL or ≥50 ng/mL. Patients undergoing low-bleed-risk procedures were more likely to have residual levels of ≥30 ng/mL and ≥50 ng/mL. For low-risk procedures, age ≥75 years, female sex, a creatinine clearance (CrCl) <50 mL/min, and an interruption of <36 hours were associated with a greater likelihood of levels ≥30 ng/mL, whereas age ≥75 years, female sex, a CrCl of <50 mL/min, and standard DOAC dosing were associated with levels ≥50 ng/mL. For high-risk procedures, weight of <70 kg, CrCl <50 mL/min, and standard DOAC dosing were associated with residual levels ≥30 ng/mL, whereas female sex was associated with levels ≥50 ng/mL. For low-risk procedures, apixaban was associated with a higher likelihood of levels ≥30 ng/mL as compared with dabigatran ( P = .0019) and of levels ≥50 ng/mL when compared with rivaroxaban ( P = .0003). For high-risk procedures, apixaban was marginally associated with a higher likelihood of residual levels ≥30 ng/mL when compared with dabigatran ( P = .05), whereas rivaroxaban was associated with a higher likelihood of levels ≥30 ng/mL as compared with apixaban. Further study is required to determine whether adjustments to perioperative plans based on these clinical parameters could result in a lower risk of residual DOAC levels. The PAUSE trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT2228798.

          Visual Abstract

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Blood Adv
          Blood Adv
          bloodoa
          Blood Adv
          Blood Advances
          Blood Advances
          American Society of Hematology (Washington, DC )
          2473-9529
          2473-9537
          11 August 2020
          05 August 2020
          05 August 2020
          : 4
          : 15
          : 3520-3527
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada;
          [2 ]The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada;
          [3 ]Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada;
          [4 ]Center for Molecular and Vascular Biology, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium;
          [5 ]Department of Vascular Medicine, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
          [6 ]Department of Medicine, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Northwell Health at Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY;
          [7 ]Department of Anesthesiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada;
          [8 ]Department of Hematology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Jeddah, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia; and
          [9 ]Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
          Author information
          https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2405-7912
          https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4803-0984
          https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7404-8918
          https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6891-9062
          https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4402-4496
          Article
          PMC7422107 PMC7422107 7422107 2020/ADV2020002335
          10.1182/bloodadvances.2020002335
          7422107
          32756938
          49a3ddfa-eab6-4dde-9aa5-2635cfa95aa3
          © 2020 by The American Society of Hematology
          History
          : 13 May 2020
          : 01 July 2020
          Page count
          Pages: 8
          Categories
          20
          29
          Thrombosis and Hemostasis
          Custom metadata
          free

          Comments

          Comment on this article

          scite_
          56
          5
          47
          0
          Smart Citations
          56
          5
          47
          0
          Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
          View Citations

          See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

          scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

          Similar content465

          Cited by17