5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Sepsis With Preexisting Heart Failure: Management of Confounding Clinical Features

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Preexisting heart failure (HF) in patients with sepsis is associated with worse clinical outcomes. Core sepsis management includes aggressive volume resuscitation followed by vasopressors (and potentially inotropes) if fluid is inadequate to restore perfusion; however, large fluid boluses and vasoactive agents are concerning amid the cardiac dysfunction of HF. This review summarizes evidence regarding the influence of HF on sepsis clinical outcomes, pathophysiologic concerns, resuscitation targets, hemodynamic interventions, and adjunct management (ie, antiarrhythmics, positive pressure ventilatory support, and renal replacement therapy) in patients with sepsis and preexisting HF. Patients with sepsis and preexisting HF receive less fluid during resuscitation; however, evidence suggests traditional fluid resuscitation targets do not increase the risk of adverse events in HF patients with sepsis and likely improve outcomes. Norepinephrine remains the most well-supported vasopressor for patients with sepsis with preexisting HF, while dopamine may induce more cardiac adverse events. Dobutamine should be used cautiously given its generally detrimental effects but may have an application when combined with norepinephrine in patients with low cardiac output. Management of chronic HF medications warrants careful consideration for continuation or discontinuation upon development of sepsis, and β-blockers may be appropriate to continue in the absence of acute hemodynamic decompensation. Optimal management of atrial fibrillation may include β-blockers after acute hemodynamic stabilization as they have also shown independent benefits in sepsis. Positive pressure ventilatory support and renal replacement must be carefully monitored for effects on cardiac function when HF is present.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Contributors
          (View ORCID Profile)
          (View ORCID Profile)
          (View ORCID Profile)
          Journal
          Journal of Intensive Care Medicine
          J Intensive Care Med
          SAGE Publications
          0885-0666
          1525-1489
          September 2021
          June 04 2020
          September 2021
          : 36
          : 9
          : 989-1012
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Department of Clinical and Administrative Pharmacy, University of Georgia College of Pharmacy, Augusta, GA, USA
          [2 ]Department of Clinical and Administrative Pharmacy, University of Georgia College of Pharmacy, Athens, GA, USA
          [3 ]Department of Pharmacy Practice, St Louis College of Pharmacy, St Louis, MO, USA
          [4 ]Department of Pharmacy, Augusta University Medical Center, Augusta, GA, USA
          Article
          10.1177/0885066620928299
          7970342
          32495686
          49999469-d06b-41be-8e4f-90f75875b0ee
          © 2021

          http://journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article