23
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Predicting personality from patterns of behavior collected with smartphones

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Significance

          Smartphones are sensor-rich computers that can easily be used to collect extensive records of behaviors, posing serious threats to individuals’ privacy. This study examines the extent to which individuals’ personality dimensions (assessed at broad domain and narrow facet levels) can be predicted from six classes of behavior: 1) communication and social behavior, 2) music consumption, 3) app usage, 4) mobility, 5) overall phone activity, and 6) day- and night-time activity, in a large sample. The cross-validated results show which Big Five personality dimensions are predictable and which specific patterns of behavior are indicative of which dimensions, revealing communication and social behavior as most predictive overall. Our results highlight the benefits and dangers posed by the widespread collection of smartphone data.

          Abstract

          Smartphones enjoy high adoption rates around the globe. Rarely more than an arm’s length away, these sensor-rich devices can easily be repurposed to collect rich and extensive records of their users’ behaviors (e.g., location, communication, media consumption), posing serious threats to individual privacy. Here we examine the extent to which individuals’ Big Five personality dimensions can be predicted on the basis of six different classes of behavioral information collected via sensor and log data harvested from smartphones. Taking a machine-learning approach, we predict personality at broad domain ( r median = 0.37) and narrow facet levels ( r median = 0.40) based on behavioral data collected from 624 volunteers over 30 consecutive days (25,347,089 logging events). Our cross-validated results reveal that specific patterns in behaviors in the domains of 1) communication and social behavior, 2) music consumption, 3) app usage, 4) mobility, 5) overall phone activity, and 6) day- and night-time activity are distinctively predictive of the Big Five personality traits. The accuracy of these predictions is similar to that found for predictions based on digital footprints from social media platforms and demonstrates the possibility of obtaining information about individuals’ private traits from behavioral patterns passively collected from their smartphones. Overall, our results point to both the benefits (e.g., in research settings) and dangers (e.g., privacy implications, psychological targeting) presented by the widespread collection and modeling of behavioral data obtained from smartphones.

          Related collections

          Most cited references58

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: robust and surprising findings.

          Secondary analyses of Revised NEO Personality Inventory data from 26 cultures (N = 23,031) suggest that gender differences are small relative to individual variation within genders; differences are replicated across cultures for both college-age and adult samples, and differences are broadly consistent with gender stereotypes: Women reported themselves to be higher in Neuroticism, Agreeableness, Warmth, and Openness to Feelings, whereas men were higher in Assertiveness and Openness to Ideas. Contrary to predictions from evolutionary theory, the magnitude of gender differences varied across cultures. Contrary to predictions from the social role model, gender differences were most pronounced in European and American cultures in which traditional sex roles are minimized. Possible explanations for this surprising finding are discussed, including the attribution of masculine and feminine behaviors to roles rather than traits in traditional cultures.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The Smartphone Psychology Manifesto.

            By 2025, when most of today's psychology undergraduates will be in their mid-30s, more than 5 billion people on our planet will be using ultra-broadband, sensor-rich smartphones far beyond the abilities of today's iPhones, Androids, and Blackberries. Although smartphones were not designed for psychological research, they can collect vast amounts of ecologically valid data, easily and quickly, from large global samples. If participants download the right "psych apps," smartphones can record where they are, what they are doing, and what they can see and hear and can run interactive surveys, tests, and experiments through touch screens and wireless connections to nearby screens, headsets, biosensors, and other peripherals. This article reviews previous behavioral research using mobile electronic devices, outlines what smartphones can do now and will be able to do in the near future, explains how a smartphone study could work practically given current technology (e.g., in studying ovulatory cycle effects on women's sexuality), discusses some limitations and challenges of smartphone research, and compares smartphones to other research methods. Smartphone research will require new skills in app development and data analysis and will raise tough new ethical issues, but smartphones could transform psychology even more profoundly than PCs and brain imaging did.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Using Smartphones to Collect Behavioral Data in Psychological Science: Opportunities, Practical Considerations, and Challenges.

              Smartphones now offer the promise of collecting behavioral data unobtrusively, in situ, as it unfolds in the course of daily life. Data can be collected from the onboard sensors and other phone logs embedded in today's off-the-shelf smartphone devices. These data permit fine-grained, continuous collection of people's social interactions (e.g., speaking rates in conversation, size of social groups, calls, and text messages), daily activities (e.g., physical activity and sleep), and mobility patterns (e.g., frequency and duration of time spent at various locations). In this article, we have drawn on the lessons from the first wave of smartphone-sensing research to highlight areas of opportunity for psychological research, present practical considerations for designing smartphone studies, and discuss the ongoing methodological and ethical challenges associated with research in this domain. It is our hope that these practical guidelines will facilitate the use of smartphones as a behavioral observation tool in psychological science.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
                Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A
                pnas
                pnas
                PNAS
                Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
                National Academy of Sciences
                0027-8424
                1091-6490
                28 July 2020
                14 July 2020
                14 July 2020
                : 117
                : 30
                : 17680-17687
                Affiliations
                [1] aDepartment of Communication, Media and Personality Laboratory, Stanford University , Stanford, CA 94305;
                [2] bDepartment of Statistics, Computational Statistics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München , 80539 Munich, Germany;
                [3] cDepartment of Psychology, Psychological Methods and Assessment, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München , 80802 Munich, Germany;
                [4] dDepartment of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin , Austin, TX 78712;
                [5] eSchool of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne , Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia;
                [6] fResearch Group Human Computer Interaction and Artificial Intelligence, Department of Computer Science, University of Bayreuth , 95447 Bayreuth, Germany;
                [7] gMedia Informatics Group, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München , 80337 Munich, Germany;
                [8] hDepartment of Psychology, Developmental Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München , 80802 Munich, Germany;
                [9] iInstitute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry, and Epidemiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München , 81377 Munich, Germany
                Author notes
                1To whom correspondence may be addressed. Email: stachl@ 123456stanford.edu .

                Edited by Susan T. Fiske, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, and approved June 18, 2020 (received for review December 2, 2019)

                Author contributions: C.S. designed research; C.S., R.S., S.T.V., T.S., M.O., and T.U. performed research; C.S., Q.A., D.B., S.T.V., T.S., T.U., H.H., B.B., and M.B. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; C.S., Q.A., M.O., and T.U. analyzed data; C.S., Q.A., S.D.G., and G.M.H. wrote the paper; C.S., R.S., S.D.G., G.M.H., D.B., S.T.V., T.S., H.H., B.B., and M.B. improved manuscript; and H.H., B.B., and M.B. provided resources.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4498-3067
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5252-8902
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8970-591X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0013-715X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3720-7120
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1215-8561
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6002-6980
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0597-8708
                Article
                201920484
                10.1073/pnas.1920484117
                7395458
                32665436
                49852b61-0483-4129-be97-0ded45229a86
                Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by PNAS.

                This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND).

                History
                Page count
                Pages: 8
                Funding
                Funded by: National Science Foundation (NSF) 100000001
                Award ID: SES-1758835
                Award Recipient : Clemens Stachl Award Recipient : Samuel D. Gosling Award Recipient : Gabriella M. Harari
                Funded by: Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) 501100002347
                Award ID: 01IS18036A
                Award Recipient : Quay Au Award Recipient : Bernd Bischl
                Categories
                Social Sciences
                Psychological and Cognitive Sciences

                personality,behavior,machine learning,mobile sensing,privacy

                Comments

                Comment on this article