9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      BRAF V600E-mutant colorectal cancer with CNS metastases treated successfully with encorafenib, binimetinib and cetuximab

      case-report

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This report describes a case of BRAF V600E-mutated colorectal cancer with CNS metastases in which treatment with encorafenib, binimetinib and cetuximab was effective. There is limited information on the ability of encorafenib, binimetinib and cetuximab to enter the CNS.

          The patient was a 53-year-old man was diagnosed with ascending colon cancer (cT3N3M1c stage IVc). BRAF V600E mutation was confirmed. FOLFOX was started, but CNS metastases soon appeared. Encorafenib, binimetinib and cetuximab were administered and had a favorable effect on the CNS lesions. The patient initially responded well, but his disease progressed 2 months later. Further research is needed to improve management strategies for BRAF V600E-mutated colorectal cancer with CNS metastases.

          Abstract

          Executive summary
          • A combination of encorafenib, binimetinib and cetuximab demonstrated effectiveness in BRAF V600E-mutated colorectal cancer with CNS metastases.

          • Treating brain metastasis in colorectal cancer is challenging because of the limited ability of drugs to penetrate the CNS.

          • Although an initial response was observed, early disease progression suggested the existence of mechanisms of resistance to EGFR/BRAF inhibitors.

          • Further research is needed to establish the efficacy of this treatment and improve management strategies.

          Related collections

          Most cited references26

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          Encorafenib, Binimetinib, and Cetuximab in BRAF V600E–Mutated Colorectal Cancer

          Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer with the BRAF V600E mutation have a poor prognosis, with a median overall survival of 4 to 6 months after failure of initial therapy. Inhibition of BRAF alone has limited activity because of pathway reactivation through epidermal growth factor receptor signaling.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Long-Term Outcomes With Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab or Nivolumab Alone Versus Ipilimumab in Patients With Advanced Melanoma

            PURPOSE In the phase III CheckMate 067 trial, durable clinical benefit was demonstrated previously with nivolumab plus ipilimumab and nivolumab alone versus ipilimumab. Here, we report 6.5-year efficacy and safety outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with previously untreated unresectable stage III or stage IV melanoma were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to receive nivolumab 1 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg once every 3 weeks (four doses) followed by nivolumab 3 mg/kg once every 2 weeks (n = 314), nivolumab 3 mg/kg once every 2 weeks (n = 316), or ipilimumab 3 mg/kg once every 3 weeks (four doses; n = 315). Coprimary end points were progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) with nivolumab plus ipilimumab or nivolumab versus ipilimumab. Secondary end points included objective response rate, descriptive efficacy assessments of nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus nivolumab alone, and safety. Melanoma-specific survival (MSS; descriptive analysis), which excludes deaths unrelated to melanoma, was also evaluated. RESULTS Median OS (minimum follow-up, 6.5 years) was 72.1, 36.9, and 19.9 months in the combination, nivolumab, and ipilimumab groups, respectively. Median MSS was not reached, 58.7, and 21.9 months, respectively; 6.5-year OS rates were 57%, 43%, and 25% in patients with BRAF -mutant tumors and 46%, 42%, and 22% in those with BRAF –wild-type tumors, respectively. In patients who discontinued treatment, the median treatment-free interval was 27.6, 2.3, and 1.9 months, respectively. Since the 5-year analysis, no new safety signals were observed. CONCLUSION These 6.5-year CheckMate 067 results, which include the longest median OS in a phase III melanoma trial reported to date and the first report of MSS, showed durable, improved clinical outcomes with nivolumab plus ipilimumab or nivolumab versus ipilimumab in patients with advanced melanoma and, in descriptive analyses, with the combination over nivolumab monotherapy.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Dabrafenib plus trametinib in patients with BRAFV600-mutant melanoma brain metastases (COMBI-MB): a multicentre, multicohort, open-label, phase 2 trial.

              Dabrafenib plus trametinib improves clinical outcomes in BRAFV600-mutant metastatic melanoma without brain metastases; however, the activity of dabrafenib plus trametinib has not been studied in active melanoma brain metastases. Here, we report results from the phase 2 COMBI-MB trial. Our aim was to build on the current body of evidence of targeted therapy in melanoma brain metastases through an evaluation of dabrafenib plus trametinib in patients with BRAFV600-mutant melanoma brain metastases.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                CNS Oncol
                CNS Oncol
                CNS Oncology
                Taylor & Francis
                2045-0907
                2045-0915
                22 May 2024
                2024
                22 May 2024
                : 13
                : 1
                : 2347824
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology , National Cancer Center Hospital , 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo,  104-0045, Japan
                Author notes
                [* ]CONTACT: Tel.: +81 335 422 511; hshouji@ 123456ncc.go.jp
                Article
                2347824
                10.1080/20450907.2024.2347824
                11137764
                496516da-98a0-4630-8de0-6fb2d931f7fa
                © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way. The terms on which this article has been published allow the posting of the Accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent.

                History
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 0, Pages: 6
                Categories
                Case Report
                Case Report

                binimetinib,braf v600e,central nervous system,cetuximab,colorectal cancer,encorafenib,metastasis

                Comments

                Comment on this article