8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Climatic niche evolution in the viviparous Sceloporus torquatus group (Squamata: Phrynosomatidae)

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The cold-climate hypothesis maintains that viviparity arose as a means to prevent increased egg mortality in nests owing to low temperatures, and this hypothesis represents the primary and most strongly supported explanation for the evolution of viviparity in reptiles. In this regard, certain authors have stated that viviparous species will exhibit speciation via climatic niche conservatism, with similar climatic niches being observed in allopatric sister species. However, this prediction remains to be tested with bioclimatic variables relevant to each viviparous group. In the present study, we examined climatic niche evolution in a group of North American viviparous lizards to determine whether their diversification is linked to phylogenetic niche conservatism (PNC). We evaluated the phylogenetic signal and trait evolution of individual bioclimatic variables and principal component (PC) scores of a PC analysis, along with reconstructions of ancestral climate tolerances. The results suggest that diversification of the Sceloporus torquatus group species is associated with both niche differentiation and PNC. Furthermore, we did not observe PNC across nearly all bioclimatic variables and in PC2 and PC3. However, in Precipitation Seasonality (Bio15), in Precipitation of Coldest Quarter (Bio19) and in PC1 (weakly associated with variability of temperature), we did observe PNC. Additionally, variation of the scores along the phylogeny and Pagel’s delta (δ) >1 of PC3 suggests a fast, recent evolution to dry conditions in the clade that sustains S. serrifer.

          Related collections

          Most cited references55

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Phylogenetic niche conservatism, phylogenetic signal and the relationship between phylogenetic relatedness and ecological similarity among species.

          Ecologists are increasingly adopting an evolutionary perspective, and in recent years, the idea that closely related species are ecologically similar has become widespread. In this regard, phylogenetic signal must be distinguished from phylogenetic niche conservatism. Phylogenetic niche conservatism results when closely related species are more ecologically similar that would be expected based on their phylogenetic relationships; its occurrence suggests that some process is constraining divergence among closely related species. In contrast, phylogenetic signal refers to the situation in which ecological similarity between species is related to phylogenetic relatedness; this is the expected outcome of Brownian motion divergence and thus is necessary, but not sufficient, evidence for the existence of phylogenetic niche conservatism. Although many workers consider phylogenetic niche conservatism to be common, a review of case studies indicates that ecological and phylogenetic similarities often are not related. Consequently, ecologists should not assume that phylogenetic niche conservatism exists, but rather should empirically examine the extent to which it occurs.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Evolution and Ecology of Species Range Limits

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Phylogenetic Comparative Analysis: A Modeling Approach for Adaptive Evolution

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                PeerJ
                PeerJ
                PeerJ
                PeerJ
                PeerJ
                PeerJ Inc. (San Diego, USA )
                2167-8359
                9 January 2019
                2019
                : 6
                : e6192
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Departamento de Zoología, Laboratorio de Bioconservación y Manejo, Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas del Instituto Politécnico Nacional , Ciudad de México, México
                [2 ]Departamento de Zoología, Laboratorio de Variación y Evolución, Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas del Instituto Politécnico Nacional , Ciudad de México, México
                [3 ]Departamento de Zoología, Laboratorio de Herpetología, Instituto de Biología de la Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México , Ciudad de México, México
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7021-8377
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1132-1910
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5084-1276
                Article
                6192
                10.7717/peerj.6192
                6330044
                30643683
                4904f453-0a6d-4ba8-97e9-822ff6a8b7f8
                © 2019 Martínez-Méndez et al.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.

                History
                : 22 December 2017
                : 1 December 2018
                Funding
                The authors received no funding for this work.
                Categories
                Biogeography
                Ecology
                Evolutionary Studies
                Zoology

                niche evolution,phylogenetic niche conservatism,sceloporus,phylogenetic signal,viviparity,cold-climate hypothesis,north america,phylogeny,phyloclimatic analysis,niche disparity through time

                Comments

                Comment on this article