Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
33
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Hegemann’s disease and fishtail deformity: aetiopathogenesis, radiographic appearance and clinical outcome

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          A systematic review regarding clinical studies on Hegemann’s disease and fishtail deformity was performed with the aims to: (1) formulate the most up-to-date theory on aetiology in order to better define these conditions, (2) summarise the most frequent radiographic descriptions on radiographs and (3) give an overview of different treatment options.

          Methods

          A systematic review of studies to date on Hegemann’s disease and fishtail deformity was performed. Studies were eligible if: (1) the article provides a description of Hegemann’s disease or fishtail deformity, (2) original data of at least one patient was available, (3) the article was written in English, German or Dutch and (4) a full manuscript was available. Animal studies, reviews and expert opinions were not included.

          Results

          We included a total of 22 articles: seven regarding Hegemann’s disease including eight patients and 15 regarding fishtail deformity including 58 patients.

          Conclusions

          Fishtail deformity and Hegemann’s disease seem to be a spectrum of vascular disorders of the distal humerus, varying from a benign mild vascular disorder to a complete avascular necrosis after fractures. Additional imaging is advised to confirm the presence of a fishtail deformity, intra-articular loose bodies and signs of osteoarthritis to decide if, and what, operative treatment is needed. As long as no clear aetiology for both diseases exist and the clinical symptoms and radiographic appearance are difficult to distinguish, both entities should preferably be named as ‘vascular disturbance of the trochlear growth plate’ to overcome confusing definitions and discussions.

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Observations concerning fractures of the lateral humeral condyle in children.

          From an anatomical study and clinical review of fractures of the lateral humeral condyle in children, the following conclusions are drawn. The mechanism of injury is a violent varus force with the elbow in extension, the condyle being avulsed by the lateral ligament and the extensor muscles. If the fracture is incomplete, with an intact hinge of pre-osseous cartilage medially, the fragment will not be displaced. If the fracture is complete the fragment may be displaced, and open reduction with internal fixation is mandatory. The results of open reduction more than three weeks after the fracture are no better than those of no treatment at all, and may kill the lateral condylar fragment by damaging its blood supply. The major problem of a neglected fracture is tardy ulnar nerve palsy; to avoid this, immediate anterior transposition of the nerve is recommended, operation for the fracture itself being of no benefit.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Deformity after fracture of the lateral humeral condyle in children.

            We studied 28 displaced (Jacob types II and III) fractures of the lateral humeral condyle in 28 children. There were only two Milch type I fractures. Twenty-one fractures were treated by open reduction and internal fixation with K-wires, Palmer nails, or sutures. Seven patients were treated with a plaster cast, five following closed reduction, and the primary displaced position being accepted in two. Anatomic reduction was obtained in 18 patients. All but one fracture were united at review 2 years to 16 years later. The distal humerus was wider on the injured side in all patients. Six patients had a visible varus deformity, and three patients had a visible valgus deformity. The radiologic tilt of the joint surface and the depth of the trochlear groove were measured in patients more than 10 years old at review. All patients with a final varus tilt of the joint surface on the injured side were less than 9 years of age at injury, and all but one of the patients with Milch type II fractures had a deepening of the trochlear groove. Two patients developed avascular necrosis of the trochlea. One of these had a concomitant fracture of the medial humeral epicondyle, and the other suffered a lateral condylar fracture preceded by a supracondylar fracture. We conclude that a reduced growth potential at the trochlear groove is a regular complication of the Milch type II fracture, and that the Jacobs classification is the most useful in the assessment of the method of treatment.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              On osteochondrosis deformas juvenilis capituli humeri including investigation of intra-osseous vasculature in distal humerus.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                femke__claessen@hotmail.com
                Journal
                J Child Orthop
                J Child Orthop
                Journal of Children's Orthopaedics
                Springer Berlin Heidelberg (Berlin/Heidelberg )
                1863-2521
                1863-2548
                11 January 2015
                11 January 2015
                February 2015
                : 9
                : 1
                : 1-8
                Affiliations
                [ ]Orthopaedic Hand and Upper Extremity Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School and University of Amsterdam Medical School, Boston, MA USA
                [ ]VU Medical Center, Orthopaedic Residency Program (PGY1), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [ ]Orthotrauma Research Center Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam Orthopaedic Residency Program (PGY4), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [ ]Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [ ]Shoulder and Elbow Unit, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [ ]Upper Limb Unit, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands
                Article
                630
                10.1007/s11832-014-0630-z
                4340852
                25577162
                48da3c05-83b9-41e2-8a93-e417f07011c7
                © The Author(s) 2015

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.

                History
                : 17 December 2014
                : 23 December 2014
                Categories
                Current Concept Review
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2015

                Orthopedics
                osteochondrosis,fishtail deformity,hegemann’s disease,children,distal humerus pain,elbow injury

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content720

                Cited by5

                Most referenced authors203